Suppr超能文献

儿童主动脉瓣上狭窄的手术治疗技术。

Surgical Techniques in Management of Supravalvular Aortic Stenosis in Children.

机构信息

Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas; Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jun;111(6):2021-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.118. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple techniques exist for the repair of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), but given the lesion's rarity, analyses comparing the efficacy of each repair have been limited.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all children at a single institution who underwent repair of SVAS from June 1995 to May 2019 was performed. Anatomic and physiologic measurements across time points were compared between 2 predominant surgical techniques. Time-to-event outcomes were compared using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

SVAS was repaired in 89 patients, by using a single-patch in 31 (35%) and the Doty repair in 58 (65%). Median age at operation was 2.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0 to 6.8 years), with median follow-up of 5.8 years (IQR, 1.8 to 10.7 years). Reoperation was required in 8 (9%) patients at a median of 1.5 years postoperatively (IQR, 0.3 to 4.8 years). There was 1 death after multiple reinterventions. The change from the preoperative to the postoperative sinotubular junction z-score was greater for patients after Doty repair (median change +2.5; IQR, 1.5, 4.1) than for patients after single-patch repair (median change +0.8; IQR, -0.1, 2.1; P = .001). Freedom from reoperation was longer for patients after Doty repair than after the single-patch technique (P = .008).

CONCLUSIONS

The Doty repair provides longer freedom from reoperation after supravalvular aortic stenosis repair compared with a single-patch technique, likely through a greater increase in the sinotubular junction at the time of initial operation.

摘要

背景

多种技术可用于修复瓣上型主动脉狭窄(SVAS),但鉴于该病变的罕见性,比较每种修复方法疗效的分析受到限制。

方法

对 1995 年 6 月至 2019 年 5 月期间在单一机构接受 SVAS 修复的所有儿童进行了回顾性分析。在两种主要手术技术之间比较了不同时间点的解剖和生理测量值。使用对数秩检验比较生存时间结果。

结果

31 例(35%)采用单补丁修复,58 例(65%)采用 Doty 修复,共 89 例患者接受了 SVAS 修复。手术时的中位年龄为 2.5 岁(四分位距[IQR],1.0 至 6.8 岁),中位随访时间为 5.8 年(IQR,1.8 至 10.7 年)。术后中位随访 1.5 年(IQR,0.3 至 4.8 年)时,8 例(9%)患者需要再次手术。多次再干预后有 1 例死亡。与单补丁修复相比,Doty 修复术后患者的窦管交界区 z 评分从术前到术后的变化更大(中位数变化+2.5;IQR,1.5,4.1),而单补丁修复术后患者的变化中位数为+0.8;IQR,-0.1,2.1;P=0.001)。Doty 修复组患者免于再次手术的时间长于单补丁修复组(P=0.008)。

结论

与单补丁技术相比,Doty 修复术在修复瓣上型主动脉狭窄后,免于再次手术的时间更长,这可能是由于初次手术时窦管交界区的变化更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验