• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

是否应同时矫正相邻无症状腰椎间盘突出症?一项仅对有症状节段进行开放融合或内镜椎间盘切除术的 371 例回顾性队列研究。

Should adjacent asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation be simultaneously rectified? A retrospective cohort study of 371 cases that received an open fusion or endoscopic discectomy only on symptomatic segments.

机构信息

Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Division of Spine Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Spine J. 2021 Mar;21(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.003
PMID:32947038
Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

In the treatment of multiple disc herniations, the decision of whether to include the presumed asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation (asLDH) at adjacent segments remains uncertain. On the one hand, the untouched asLDH might soon become symptomatic and require treatment. On the other hand, additional surgery involving more segments will introduce greater risk, complications, and cost.

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognosis of untreated asLDH after open fusion or percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) on symptomatic lumbar disc herniation (LDHs) in patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 371 patients with multiple disc herniations who underwent open discectomy and fusion or PELD only for symptomatic levels from January 2012 to July 2018 were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of interest was the development of symptomatic LDH at the previous asLDH of both groups that required reoperation. A second analysis was performed to compare the reoperation rate due to deterioration of asLDH among different severity grades of herniation. Reoperation rates of the original surgery at the symptomatic segment in both fusion and PELD groups were also reviewed.

METHODS

The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical procedure, with 264 patients undergoing fusion surgery and 107 patients undergoing PELD. Clinical and imaging follow-ups were performed at routine intervals for more than 3 years. The reoperation rates due to deterioration of previously asLDH and failure of original surgery were investigated and compared between the two groups, as well as among the different severity grades of herniation.

RESULTS

The follow-up times were 48.2±24.2 and 41.1±17.5 months for the fusion and the PELD groups, respectively. The overall reoperation rate at the previous adjacent asLDH was 6.7% (25/317). According to the severity of the asLDH, a higher grade of asymptomatic herniation yielded a significantly higher rate of reoperation rate in both groups. If the nerve root was displaced by disc material prominently (nG2), the reoperation rate of asLDHs was 42.9% (3/7) in the fusion group and 20% (3/15) in the PELD group. Twenty out of 264 patients (7.6%) in the fusion group and 5 out of 107 patients (4.7%) in the PELD group required reoperation due to deterioration of asLDH. Reoperation rates due to failure of the original surgery were 7.6% (20/264) in the fusion group and 8.4% (9/107) in the PELD group.

CONCLUSIONS

With multilevel LDHs, if the asLDH is left untreated, the reoperation rate is closely related to the degree of herniation. When confronting an asLDH graded as G2, a high possibility of reoperation should be clearly discussed with the patient, regardless of open fusion or PELD techniques. Considering that fusion and minimally invasive nonfusion techniques did not yield significantly different overall reoperation rates, ongoing degeneration seemed to have a greater contribution in terms of the deterioration of asLDH.

摘要

背景

在治疗多节段椎间盘突出症时,是否包括相邻节段假定无症状的腰椎间盘突出症(asLDH)仍然存在不确定性。一方面,未治疗的 asLDH 可能很快出现症状并需要治疗。另一方面,更多节段的额外手术会带来更大的风险、并发症和成本。

目的

研究接受开放融合或经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)治疗有症状腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者无症状腰椎间盘突出症(asLDH)的预后。

研究设计

这是一项回顾性队列研究。

患者样本

共纳入 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 7 月期间因有症状水平接受开放椎间盘切除术和融合术或 PELD 治疗的 371 例多节段椎间盘突出症患者。

主要结局指标

两组患者的主要结局指标为需要再次手术的先前无症状的 asLDH 出现症状性 LDH。进行了第二次分析以比较不同严重程度的突出症中因 asLDH 恶化而导致的再次手术率。还回顾了融合组和 PELD 组在原始手术时在症状节段的再次手术率。

方法

根据手术方式将患者分为两组,264 例行融合手术,107 例行 PELD。对两组患者进行常规间隔的临床和影像学随访,随访时间超过 3 年。研究了因先前无症状的 asLDH 恶化和原始手术失败导致的再次手术率,并比较了两组之间以及不同严重程度的突出症之间的差异。

结果

融合组和 PELD 组的随访时间分别为 48.2±24.2 和 41.1±17.5 个月。先前相邻无症状 asLDH 的总体再手术率为 6.7%(25/317)。根据 asLDH 的严重程度,无症状突出症的严重程度越高,两组的再手术率越高。如果神经根被椎间盘物质明显移位(nG2),融合组的再手术率为 42.9%(3/7),PELD 组为 20%(3/15)。融合组中有 20 例(7.6%)患者和 PELD 组中有 5 例(4.7%)患者因 asLDH 恶化需要再次手术。融合组中因原始手术失败导致的再手术率为 7.6%(20/264),PELD 组为 8.4%(9/107)。

结论

对于多节段 LDH,如果不治疗无症状的 LDH,再手术率与突出程度密切相关。当面对 G2 级的 asLDH 时,无论采用开放融合或 PELD 技术,都应与患者明确讨论再次手术的可能性。考虑到融合和微创非融合技术的总体再手术率没有显著差异,持续性退变似乎对 asLDH 的恶化有更大的影响。

相似文献

1
Should adjacent asymptomatic lumbar disc herniation be simultaneously rectified? A retrospective cohort study of 371 cases that received an open fusion or endoscopic discectomy only on symptomatic segments.是否应同时矫正相邻无症状腰椎间盘突出症?一项仅对有症状节段进行开放融合或内镜椎间盘切除术的 371 例回顾性队列研究。
Spine J. 2021 Mar;21(3):411-417. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: minimally invasive technique for multiple episodes of lumbar disc herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术:治疗多次发作的腰椎间盘突出症的微创技术。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1697-8.
3
Adjuvant surgical decision-making system for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation after percutaneous endoscopic lumber discectomy: a retrospective nonlinear multiple logistic regression prediction model based on a large sample.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症后辅助手术决策系统:基于大样本的回顾性非线性多因素 logistic 回归预测模型。
Spine J. 2021 Dec;21(12):2035-2048. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
4
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Jan 15;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-02929-5.
5
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy Versus Posterior Open Lumbar Microdiscectomy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与后路开放式腰椎显微椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:352-362. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.236. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
6
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus microendoscopic discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与显微镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):923-937. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4253-8. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for All Types of Lumbar Disc Herniations (LDH) Including Severely Difficult and Extremely Difficult LDH Cases.经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗各种类型的腰椎间盘突出症(LDH),包括极困难和极其困难的 LDH 病例。
Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):E401-E408.
8
Follow-up results of microendoscopic discectomy compared to day surgery using percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术与微创经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的日间手术疗效比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Feb 9;22(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04038-6.
9
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Highly Migrated Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗高度移位型腰椎间盘突出症
Pain Physician. 2017 Jan-Feb;20(1):E75-E84.
10
A matched comparison of outcomes between percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation: a 2-year retrospective cohort study.经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术与开放腰椎显微切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效比较:一项 2 年回顾性队列研究。
Spine J. 2021 Jan;21(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Treatment Guidelines for Lumbar Disc Herniation.腰椎间盘突出症治疗指南的系统评价
Neurospine. 2025 Jun;22(2):389-402. doi: 10.14245/ns.2550398.199. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
Deep learning-based multimodal integration of imaging and clinical data for predicting surgical approach in percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy.基于深度学习的影像学与临床数据多模态整合用于预测经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术的手术入路
Eur Spine J. 2025 Feb 8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08668-5.
3
Repeat Surgery after Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Adolescent Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Multicenter Observational Study.
经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗青少年腰椎间盘突出症后的再次手术:一项多中心观察研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Jun;16(6):1336-1343. doi: 10.1111/os.14042. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
4
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for multi-segmental lumbar disc herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗多节段腰椎间盘突出症的疗效及安全性评估
Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Nov-Dec;39(6):1626-1630. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.6.3399.
5
Application of stem cells combined with biomaterial in the treatment of intervertebral disc degeneration.干细胞联合生物材料在椎间盘退变治疗中的应用。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 25;10:1077028. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1077028. eCollection 2022.
6
Curative Effects of Remote Home Management Combined with Feng's Spinal Manipulation on the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation.远程居家管理联合冯氏脊柱手法治疗对老年腰椎间盘突出症患者的疗效。
J Healthc Eng. 2022 Jan 25;2022:1420392. doi: 10.1155/2022/1420392. eCollection 2022.