Jois Ravisha S, Tan Jason K, Silva Desiree
Neonatal Unit, Joondalup Health Campus, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Perth Children's Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2020 Sep;56(9):1468-1472. doi: 10.1111/jpc.15021.
Rectovaginal group B streptococcal (GBS) colonisation affects approximately 30% of pregnant women, which significantly increases the use of antibiotics in mothers and babies. In this review, we aim to answer two questions: (i) In pregnant women, does the use of probiotics prevent GBS colonisation prior to delivery when compared with placebo; and (ii) In GBS positive pregnant women, does the use of probiotics reduce the risk of GBS colonisation prior to delivery when compared with standard treatment. Pubmed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, OVID, clinical trials.gov, grey literature and conference proceedings were systematically searched to identify eligible trials. References of included trials were also reviewed. A total of four studies (n = 402) were included in the final review. Two studies reported on the prevention of GBS colonisation in healthy pregnant women, and two studies reported on the rate of GBS clearance after probiotic administration. Meta-analysis of the two studies using random effects model indicated that GBS clearance with probiotics was not statistically significant with odds ratio 2.12 (95% confidence interval 0.60-7.50, P = 0.17). Collection of adverse events data was not a primary or secondary aim in any of the studies. We conclude that there is limited evidence to recommend the regular use of probiotics to minimise the risk of GBS colonisation. Results from ongoing studies are likely to add to the current existing evidence.
直肠阴道B族链球菌(GBS)定植影响约30%的孕妇,这显著增加了母婴抗生素的使用。在本综述中,我们旨在回答两个问题:(i)与安慰剂相比,孕妇使用益生菌是否能在分娩前预防GBS定植;(ii)与标准治疗相比,GBS阳性孕妇使用益生菌是否能降低分娩前GBS定植的风险。我们系统检索了PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、OVID、临床试验.gov、灰色文献和会议论文集,以确定符合条件的试验。还对纳入试验的参考文献进行了审查。最终综述共纳入四项研究(n = 402)。两项研究报告了健康孕妇GBS定植的预防情况,两项研究报告了益生菌给药后GBS清除率。使用随机效应模型对两项研究进行的荟萃分析表明,益生菌清除GBS无统计学意义,优势比为2.12(95%置信区间0.60 - 7.50,P = 0.17)。在任何一项研究中,收集不良事件数据都不是主要或次要目标。我们得出结论,推荐常规使用益生菌以降低GBS定植风险的证据有限。正在进行的研究结果可能会增加现有证据。