University of Brasilia, Post-Graduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Centro Metropolitano, conjunto A, lote 01, Brasília, Federal District, 72220-275, Brazil; University of Western Ontario, School of Physical Therapy, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada.
University of Western Ontario, School of Physical Therapy, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 3K7, Canada.
Gait Posture. 2020 Oct;82:209-216. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.09.008. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
Thumb orthoses are a standard treatment modality, with substantial evidence to support its usage for multiple conditions affecting the upper extremity. Despite commonly prescribed, little is known about the immediate impact of such devices on the upper extremity, including potential modifications on motor patterns.
We aimed to determine the changes in the upper limb kinematics during the usage of thumb orthotics, comparing differences in orthotic design, length, and fabrication materials.
In this cross-sectional study, subjects performed a standardized reaching task and the placing subtest of the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT) while wearing five unique thumb orthoses. Besides the active range of motion of the shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand joints, movement smoothness (Number of Movement Units-NMU), speed, and motion control strategies were analyzed through eight Qualisys Oqus 300 cameras (Qualisys AB, Göteborg, Sweden).
Ten non-disabled, university students participated in this study. Despite differences in fabrication materials, all orthotics reduced thumb's abduction (13.3° to 4.3°), and metacarpophalangeal flexion (11.5° to 4.2°). Although orthotics impacted movement smoothness and hand function during its usage, forearm-based devices further increased the NMUs and the time required for the MMDT performance (Control: NMU = 4.8, MMDT = 58.1; Long Orthotics: NMU = 6.6, MMDT = 78.2), while short, flexible orthoses provided thumb stabilization without significant impact on upper extremity movement strategies.
Although joint stabilization was similar among orthotics fabricated with rigid and flexible materials, the improved hand dexterity observed during the use of flexible devices suggests an advantage of flexible orthotics for enhanced stability and hand function. These results can assist healthcare professionals during the selection and prescription of thumb orthotics, providing information not only on the range of motion but other sensorimotor aspects involved in upper extremity movement patterns that may be affected by orthotics usage.
拇指矫形器是一种标准的治疗方式,有大量证据支持其用于多种影响上肢的病症。尽管它被广泛应用,但人们对其对手部的即时影响知之甚少,包括对手部运动模式的潜在改变。
我们旨在确定在使用拇指矫形器时上肢运动学的变化,比较矫形器设计、长度和制造材料的差异。
在这项横断面研究中,受试者在佩戴五种不同拇指矫形器的情况下进行了标准的上肢伸展任务和明尼苏达手灵巧测试(MMDT)的放置分测验。除了肩、肘、腕和手部关节的主动活动范围外,还通过八台 Qualisys Oqus 300 摄像机(Qualisys AB,哥德堡,瑞典)分析运动平滑度(运动单位数量-NMU)、速度和运动控制策略。
十名非残疾大学生参加了这项研究。尽管制造材料不同,但所有矫形器都减少了拇指的外展(从 13.3°减少到 4.3°)和掌指关节的弯曲(从 11.5°减少到 4.2°)。尽管矫形器在使用过程中影响了运动平滑度和手部功能,但基于前臂的设备进一步增加了 NMU 和 MMDT 测试所需的时间(对照组:NMU=4.8,MMDT=58.1;长矫形器:NMU=6.6,MMDT=78.2),而短而灵活的矫形器则在不显著影响上肢运动策略的情况下为拇指提供了稳定性。
尽管由刚性和柔性材料制成的矫形器的关节稳定性相似,但在使用柔性设备时观察到的手部灵巧性提高表明,柔性矫形器在增强稳定性和手部功能方面具有优势。这些结果可以帮助医疗保健专业人员在选择和开处拇指矫形器时提供信息,不仅提供有关运动范围的信息,还提供可能受矫形器使用影响的上肢运动模式的其他感觉运动方面的信息。