Hospital General Universitario de Elche and Universidad Miguel Hernández, Camí de la Almazara 11, Elche, Alicante 03203, Spain.
Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Camí de la Almazara 11, Elche, Alicante 03203, Spain.
EBioMedicine. 2020 Oct;60:102999. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102999. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
BACKGROUND: The virological and immunological effects of the immunomodulatory drugs used for COVID-19 remain unknown. We evaluated the impact of interleukin (IL)-6 blockade with tocilizumab on SARS-CoV-2 viral kinetics and the antibody response in patients with COVID-19. METHODS: Prospective cohort study in patients admitted with COVID-19. Serial nasopharyngeal and plasma samples were measured for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and S-IgG/N-IgG titers, respectively. FINDINGS: 138 patients with confirmed infection were included; 76 (55%) underwent IL-6 blockade. Median initial SOFA (p = 0•016) and SARS-CoV-2 viral load (p<0•001, Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test) were significantly higher among anti-IL-6 users. Patients under IL-6 blockade showed delayed viral clearance in the Kaplan-Meier curves (HR 0•35 [95%CI] [0•15-0•81], log-rank p = 0•014), but an adjusted propensity score matching model did not demonstrate a significant relationship of IL-6 blockade with viral clearance (HR 1•63 [0•35-7•7]). Cox regression showed an inverse association between SARS-CoV-2 RNA clearance and the initial viral load (HR 0•35 [0•11-0•89]). Patients under the IL-6 blocker showed shorter median time to seropositivity, higher peak antibody titers, and higher cumulative proportion of seropositivity in the Kaplan Meier curves (HR 3•1 [1•9-5] for S-IgG; and HR 3•0 [1•9-4•9] for N-IgG; log-rank p<0•001 for both). However, no significant differences between groups were found in either S-IgG (HR 1•56 [0•41-6•0]) nor N-IgG (HR 0•96 [0•26-3•5]) responses in an adjusted propensity score analysis. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, IL-6 blockade does not impair the viral specific antibody responses. Although a delayed viral clearance was observed, it was driven by a higher initial viral load. The study supports the safety of this therapy in patients with COVID-19. FUNDING: Instituto de salud Carlos III (Spain).
背景:用于 COVID-19 的免疫调节药物的病毒学和免疫学效应尚不清楚。我们评估了白细胞介素(IL)-6 阻断剂托珠单抗对 COVID-19 患者 SARS-CoV-2 病毒动力学和抗体反应的影响。
方法:对因 COVID-19 住院的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。分别对鼻咽和血浆样本进行 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 和 S-IgG/N-IgG 滴度的连续测量。
结果:共纳入 138 例确诊感染患者,其中 76 例(55%)接受了 IL-6 阻断治疗。抗 IL-6 使用者的初始 SOFA(p=0.016)和 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量(p<0.001,Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon 检验)中位数显著更高。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示 IL-6 阻断组病毒清除延迟(HR 0.35[95%CI] [0.15-0.81],对数秩检验 p=0.014),但调整后的倾向评分匹配模型未显示 IL-6 阻断与病毒清除之间存在显著关系(HR 1.63[0.35-7.7])。Cox 回归显示 SARS-CoV-2 RNA 清除与初始病毒载量呈负相关(HR 0.35[0.11-0.89])。接受 IL-6 阻滞剂的患者达到血清阳性的中位时间更短,峰值抗体滴度更高,Kaplan-Meier 曲线中血清阳性的累积比例更高(S-IgG 的 HR 3.1[1.9-5];N-IgG 的 HR 3.0[1.9-4.9];对数秩检验均 p<0.001)。然而,在调整后的倾向评分分析中,两组之间的 S-IgG(HR 1.56[0.41-6.0])和 N-IgG(HR 0.96[0.26-3.5])反应均未发现显著差异。
结论:我们的研究结果表明,在感染 SARS-CoV-2 的患者中,IL-6 阻断不会损害病毒特异性抗体反应。尽管观察到病毒清除延迟,但这是由更高的初始病毒载量驱动的。该研究支持 COVID-19 患者使用该疗法的安全性。
资金:西班牙卡洛斯三世健康研究所(Instituto de salud Carlos III)。
Sci Rep. 2020-10-13
Sci Rep. 2020-10-8
Int Immunopharmacol. 2020-8-4
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023-12
Front Pharmacol. 2023-4-12
Microorganisms. 2023-4-13
Lancet Rheumatol. 2020-8
Nat Med. 2020-4-29
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020-4-29
J Transl Med. 2020-4-14
Infect Dis (Lond). 2020-7