Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lebanese American University-Rizk Hospital and Lebanese American University School of Medicine, P.O. Box 11-3288, Beirut, Lebanon.
Chirurgie Orthopédique, Clinique des Cèdres, Echirolles, France.
Int Orthop. 2021 Aug;45(8):1961-1969. doi: 10.1007/s00264-020-04791-8. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Dual-mobility cups (DMC) are gaining popularity mainly for their reduced rate of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Currently, indication for DMC use extends beyond patients with high risk of dislocation or revision THA cases. Many authors reported DMC outcomes in primary THA for all aetiologies. However, some reports claimed that the use of DMC is accompanied with higher rates of infection compared with conventional cups (CC) in both primary and revision THA.
Does the use of DMC generate higher rates of infection when compared with conventional cups?
The aim of this meta-analysis was to look for significant difference in the rate of post-operative infection between DMC cups and conventional cups.
MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched since inception. Only studies with comparative design reporting the outcome infection rate were included.
Seventeen retrospective comparative studies were located comprising 248,541 patients: 16,020 in the DMC group and 232,521 in the CC group. The mean follow-up period was 37.5 ± 42 and 50.2 ± 48.7 months for the DMC and CC groups, respectively. The meta-analytical results indicated the following: (a) significantly lesser infections following DMC compared with CC in revision THA (odds ratio (OR) = 0.75 (95% CI = 0.653 to 0.874, P = 0.0002, I = 25%); (b) for primary THA and for large-sampled registries, significance was found using only the fixed-effects model estimate; and (c) no significant difference was found for the subgroup of cohort studies.
Our results clearly refute the claim that DMC would yield higher rates of infection. On the contrary, the findings demonstrated that the use of DMC reduces the risk of post-operative infection in revision THA and a similar lower infection trend for primary THA when compared with the standard cups.
双动杯(DMC)在全髋关节置换术后(THA)脱位率降低的情况下越来越受欢迎。目前,DMC 的使用指征已扩展到高脱位风险或翻修 THA 患者以外的患者。许多作者报告了 DMC 在原发性 THA 中的结果,病因多种多样。然而,一些报告称,与传统杯(CC)相比,DMC 在原发性和翻修 THA 中都伴随着更高的感染率。
与传统杯相比,使用 DMC 是否会产生更高的感染率?
本荟萃分析的目的是寻找 DMC 杯与传统杯之间术后感染率的显著差异。
从成立开始,对 MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane 图书馆和 Google Scholar 进行了搜索。仅纳入了具有比较设计并报告感染率结果的研究。
共定位了 17 项回顾性比较研究,共纳入 248541 例患者:DMC 组 16020 例,CC 组 232521 例。DMC 组和 CC 组的平均随访时间分别为 37.5±42 和 50.2±48.7 个月。荟萃分析结果表明:(a)与 CC 相比,在翻修 THA 中,DMC 组感染率显著降低(比值比(OR)=0.75(95%置信区间(CI)=0.653 至 0.874,P=0.0002,I²=25%);(b)对于原发性 THA 和大样本登记处,仅使用固定效应模型估计值即可得出统计学意义;(c)队列研究亚组无显著差异。
我们的结果清楚地驳斥了 DMC 会产生更高感染率的说法。相反,研究结果表明,与标准杯相比,DMC 在翻修 THA 中降低了术后感染的风险,在原发性 THA 中也呈现出类似的较低感染趋势。