a Department of Orthopedic Surgery , Sint Maartenskliniek , Nijmegen.
b Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) , Hertogenbosch , the Netherlands.
Acta Orthop. 2019 Feb;90(1):11-14. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1542210. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
Background and purpose - We noticed an increased use of dual mobility cups (DMC) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) despite limited knowledge of implant longevity. Therefore, we determined the trend over time and mid-term cup revision rates of DMC compared with unipolar cups (UC) in primary THA. Patients and methods - All primary THA registered in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) during 2007-2016 were included (n = 215,953) and divided into 2 groups - DMC THA (n = 3,038) and UC THA (n = 212,915). Crude competing risk and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed with cup revision for any reason as primary endpoint. Adjustments were made for sex, age, diagnosis at primary THA, previous operation, ASA score, type of fixation, surgical approach, and femoral head size. Results - The proportion of primary DMC THA increased from 0.8% (n = 184) in 2010 to 2.6% (n = 740) in 2016. Patients who underwent DMC THA more often had a previous operation on the affected hip, a higher ASA score, and the diagnosis acute fracture or late posttraumatic status compared with the UC THA group. Overall 5-year cup revision rate was 1.5% (95% CI 1.0-2.3) for DMC and 1.4% (CI 1.3-1.4) for UC THA. Stratified analyses for patient characteristics showed no differences in cup revision rates between the 2 groups. Multivariable regression analyses showed no statistically significantly increased risk for revision for DMC THA (HR 0.9 [0.6-1.2]). Interpretation - The use of primary DMC THA increased with differences in patient characteristics. The 5-year cup revision rates for DMC THA and UC THA were comparable.
背景与目的 - 尽管对植入物寿命的了解有限,但我们注意到在初次全髋关节置换术(THA)中双动杯(DMC)的使用增加了。因此,我们确定了 DMC 与单极杯(UC)相比在初次 THA 中的随时间推移的趋势和中期杯翻修率。
患者和方法 - 2007-2016 年期间在荷兰关节置换登记处(LROI)登记的所有初次 THA 患者(n = 215953)被纳入研究,并分为 2 组-DMC-THA(n = 3038)和 UC-THA(n = 212915)。主要终点为任何原因的杯翻修,采用粗竞争风险和多变量 Cox 回归分析。调整了性别、年龄、初次 THA 诊断、既往手术、ASA 评分、固定类型、手术入路和股骨头大小。
结果 - 初次 DMC-THA 的比例从 2010 年的 0.8%(n = 184)增加到 2016 年的 2.6%(n = 740)。与 UC-THA 组相比,接受 DMC-THA 的患者既往髋关节手术、ASA 评分较高,且诊断为急性骨折或晚期创伤后状态的比例更高。总体而言,DMC 为 5 年的杯翻修率为 1.5%(95%CI 1.0-2.3),UC 为 1.4%(CI 1.3-1.4)。对患者特征的分层分析显示,两组间的杯翻修率无差异。多变量回归分析显示,DMC-THA 的翻修风险无统计学显著增加(HR 0.9 [0.6-1.2])。
解释 - 初次 DMC-THA 的使用因患者特征的差异而增加。DMC-THA 和 UC-THA 的 5 年杯翻修率相当。