• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髌股重建在翻修全膝关节置换术中的应用。

Patellar Rebar Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):670-675. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.057. Epub 2020 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.057
PMID:32951925
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In revision total knee arthroplasty, osteolysis, mechanical abrasion, and infection may leave patellar bone stock severely attenuated with cavitary and/or segmental rim deficiencies that compromise fixation of patellar implant pegs. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the use of cortical "rebar" screws to augment cement fixation in revision patelloplasty.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2018, dorsal patellar rebar technique was used for patellar reconstruction in 128 of 1037 revision total knee arthroplasty cases (12.3%). Follow-up was achieved with serial radiographs and prospective comparison of Knee Society Scores (KSSs) for clinical outcome. Complications and implant failures requiring reoperation or modified rehabilitation were also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 128 patellar revisions performed using the rebar technique, 69 patients were women and 59 patients were men. The average age of the group was 69.5 years (range, 32-83 years). The mean follow-up of the cohort was 37 months (range, 13-109 months). The most common causes for revision were kinematic conflict, periprosthetic joint infection, and aseptic loosening. The median number of rebar screws used was 5 (range, 1-13). Preoperative KSSs for the study cohort averaged 50 (range, 0-90) At latest follow-up, mean KSS was 85 (range, 54-100). There were 4 patellar-related complications (3.1%) with no implant failures at study conclusion. Retrieval analysis revealed rigid fixation of the reconstructed patellar component in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Patellar rebar screw augmentation is a useful technique when there are significant cavitary deficiencies and limited segmental rim deficiencies. This technique allows the surgeon to extend indications for patellar revision arthroplasty.

摘要

背景

在翻修全膝关节置换术中,骨溶解、机械磨损和感染可能导致髌骨骨量严重减少,出现空洞性和/或节段性边缘缺陷,从而影响髌骨植入物钉的固定。本研究的目的是回顾性分析皮质“钢筋”螺钉在翻修髌骨成形术中增强骨水泥固定的效果。

方法

2006 年至 2018 年,我们对 1037 例翻修全膝关节置换术患者中的 128 例(12.3%)采用背侧髌骨钢筋技术进行髌骨重建。通过连续影像学检查和前瞻性比较膝关节协会评分(KSS)来评估临床结果。还评估了并发症和需要再次手术或修改康复的植入物失败。

结果

采用钢筋技术进行的 128 例髌骨翻修中,69 例为女性,59 例为男性。该组的平均年龄为 69.5 岁(范围,32-83 岁)。该队列的平均随访时间为 37 个月(范围,13-109 个月)。翻修的最常见原因是运动学冲突、假体周围关节感染和无菌性松动。使用钢筋螺钉的中位数为 5 枚(范围,1-13 枚)。研究队列的术前 KSS 平均为 50 分(范围,0-90 分)。在最新的随访中,平均 KSS 为 85 分(范围,54-100 分)。研究结束时,有 4 例髌骨相关并发症(3.1%),无植入物失败。取出分析显示所有病例重建髌骨组件均固定牢固。

结论

当存在严重的空洞性缺陷和有限的节段性边缘缺陷时,髌骨钢筋螺钉增强是一种有用的技术。该技术可扩大髌骨翻修关节置换术的适应证。

相似文献

1
Patellar Rebar Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.髌股重建在翻修全膝关节置换术中的应用。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Feb;36(2):670-675. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.08.057. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
2
Biconvex Patellar Components: 96% Durability at 10 Years in 262 Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties.双凸面髌骨组件:262 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,96%的 10 年存活率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jul 7;103(13):1220-1228. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.01064.
3
Fate of the unrevised all-polyethylene patellar component in revision total knee arthroplasty.全聚乙烯髌骨部件在翻修全膝关节置换术中未翻修的转归情况
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):56-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00009.
4
[Patellar bone deficiency in revision total knee arthroplasty].[翻修全膝关节置换术中的髌骨缺损]
Orthopade. 2016 May;45(5):433-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-016-3253-x.
5
Long-Term Results of Patellar Bone-Grafting for Severe Patellar Bone Loss During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术中严重髌骨关节丢失行髌骨关节植骨的长期结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Sep 18;101(18):1636-1644. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00519.
6
Isolated revision of the patellar component in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中髌骨组件的单独翻修术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jan;85(1):41-7. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200301000-00007.
7
What Is the Role for Patelloplasty With Gullwing Osteotomy in Revision TKA?海鸥翼截骨术联合髌骨成形术在全膝关节置换翻修术中的作用是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jan;474(1):101-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4363-1.
8
Uncemented Metal-Backed Tantalum Patellar Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty Have a High Fracture Rate at Midterm Follow-Up.非骨水泥固定金属背衬钽髌骨假体在全膝关节置换术中的中期随访中具有较高的骨折率。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2427-2430. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.062. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
Patellar management in revision total knee arthroplasty: is patellar resurfacing a better option?翻修全膝关节置换术中的髌骨管理:髌骨表面置换术是更好的选择吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jun;25(4):589-93. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.009. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
10
The Fate and Relevance of the Patella in Two-Stage Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection.二期翻修全膝关节置换术治疗假体周围关节感染时髌骨的结局和相关性。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Oct;37(10):2090-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.004. Epub 2022 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.翻修全膝关节置换术中骨丢失的管理:一场国际共识研讨会
HSS J. 2024 May;20(2):141-181. doi: 10.1177/15563316231202750. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Early Shear Failure of a 3-Peg Modified Dome Patellar Implant.三钉改良穹顶髌骨植入物的早期剪切失败
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Jul 4;28:101448. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101448. eCollection 2024 Aug.
3
A Crossed Screw Patellar Reconstruction Technique for the Treatment of the Severely Deficient Scaphoid Shaped Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
一种用于全膝关节置换术中治疗舟状骨形态严重缺损髌骨的交叉螺钉髌骨重建技术。
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Nov 6;24:101259. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101259. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Resurfacing Egg-shell Patellar Defect in a Single-staged Primary total Knee Arthroplasty - A Case Report.单阶段初次全膝关节置换术中蛋壳样髌骨缺损的表面置换——病例报告
J Orthop Case Rep. 2022 Sep;12(9):1-5. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i09.2990.