Yoon Jin A, Shin Myung Jun, Shin Yong Beom, Kim Keunyoung, Park Heeseung, Kang Taewoo, Kong In Joo, Kim Hyojeong, Park Min Suk, Kim Joo Hyoung
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 Nov;73(11):1982-1988. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.055. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
To examine the correlation between lymphedema severity stages on lymphoscintigraphy and on indocyanine green (ICG) lymphography in patients with secondary lymphedema after breast cancer.
This retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent both lymphoscintigraphy and ICG lymphography for the evaluation of secondary lymphedema after breast cancer. The images were classified into type I - V according to the Arm Dermal Backflow (ADB) stage and modified MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) stage on ICG lymphography and lymphoscintigraphy images on the basis of how lymphatic flow was preserved and how dermal back flow was extended. The correlation between scales was analysed.
A total of 47 patients were referred to our hospital for the evaluation of secondary lymphedema after breast cancer. There was no significant difference between lymphoscintigraphy severity scale and ADB stage (anterior and posterior). The lymphoscintigraphy severity scale and modified MDACC stage were significantly different. In the correlation analysis, lymphoscintigraphy and ADB (anterior) stage (r = 0.83), lymphoscintigraphy and ADB (posterior) stage (r = 0.86) and lymphoscintigraphy and modified MDACC stage (r = 0.85) exhibited very strong positive correlations. Intra-rater agreement between lymphoscintigraphy and ADB (anterior) stage and lymphoscintigraphy and ADB (posterior) was substantial (κ=0.62 and κ=0.69, respectively) and fair (κ = 0.36) between lymphoscintigraphy and modified MDACC stage.
Lymphoscintigraphy severity stage and ADB stage on ICG lymphography showed very strong positive correlation and substantial agreement. These two modalities can work synergistically to evaluate lymphedema severity.
探讨乳腺癌继发淋巴水肿患者淋巴闪烁造影与吲哚菁绿(ICG)淋巴管造影的淋巴水肿严重程度分期之间的相关性。
本回顾性研究针对因评估乳腺癌继发淋巴水肿而同时接受淋巴闪烁造影和ICG淋巴管造影的患者进行。根据ICG淋巴管造影和淋巴闪烁造影图像上的上肢皮肤反流(ADB)分期及改良的MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC)分期,依据淋巴流的保留情况和皮肤反流的扩展情况,将图像分为I - V型。分析各分期之间的相关性。
共有47例患者因评估乳腺癌继发淋巴水肿转诊至我院。淋巴闪烁造影严重程度分期与ADB分期(前后位)之间无显著差异。淋巴闪烁造影严重程度分期与改良的MDACC分期有显著差异。在相关性分析中,淋巴闪烁造影与ADB(前位)分期(r = 0.83)、淋巴闪烁造影与ADB(后位)分期(r = 0.86)以及淋巴闪烁造影与改良的MDACC分期(r = 0.85)均呈现出非常强的正相关性。淋巴闪烁造影与ADB(前位)分期以及淋巴闪烁造影与ADB(后位)分期之间的评分者内一致性较高(κ分别为0.62和0.69),而淋巴闪烁造影与改良的MDACC分期之间的一致性为中等(κ = 0.36)。
淋巴闪烁造影严重程度分期与ICG淋巴管造影的ADB分期显示出非常强的正相关性和较高的一致性。这两种检查方法可协同作用以评估淋巴水肿的严重程度。