Gilligan Daniel O, Kumar Neha, McNiven Scott, Meenakshi J V, Quisumbing Agnes
International Food Policy Research Institute, United States.
University of California, Davis (posthumous), United States.
Food Policy. 2020 Aug;95:101909. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101909.
We examine the role of gender dimensions of intrahousehold bargaining power and decision making in the adoption and diffusion of orange sweet potato (OSP), a biofortified crop being promoted to increase dietary intakes of vitamin A in Uganda. We use patterns of ownership and control of land and other assets by married men and women to create gender-disaggregated indicators of bargaining power, allowing for joint and sole ownership and control of land and assets. Using data from an experimental evaluation of a project promoting OSP adoption, we find that the probability of adopting OSP is not affected by the exclusive or joint control of assets by women at the household level. However, within households, parcels of land under joint control, in which the woman has primary control over decision making, are significantly more likely to contain OSP. Women who control a higher share of household nonland resources are more likely to share OPS vines, showing that women use greater bargaining power to facilitate diffusion of this health-promoting technology. We do not find any impact of women's bargaining power on children's dietary intakes of Vitamin A, possibly because husbands and wives have the same preferences regarding their children's nutritional status. These results contribute to reshaping our understanding of household decision making to inform the design and implementation of agriculture-nutrition interventions.
我们研究了家庭内部议价能力和决策的性别层面在橙色甘薯(OSP)的采用和推广中所起的作用。橙色甘薯是一种生物强化作物,在乌干达被推广用于增加维生素A的膳食摄入量。我们利用已婚男女对土地和其他资产的所有权及控制权模式,创建了按性别分类的议价能力指标,涵盖土地和资产的共同及单独所有权与控制权。利用一个推广橙色甘薯采用项目的实验评估数据,我们发现,家庭层面女性对资产的排他性或共同控制权并不影响采用橙色甘薯的概率。然而,在家庭内部,共同控制的土地地块(其中女性对决策有主要控制权)显著更有可能种植橙色甘薯。控制家庭非土地资源份额较高的女性更有可能分享橙色甘薯藤蔓,这表明女性利用更大的议价能力来促进这种促进健康技术的推广。我们没有发现女性议价能力对儿童维生素A膳食摄入量有任何影响,这可能是因为丈夫和妻子在子女营养状况方面有相同的偏好。这些结果有助于重塑我们对家庭决策的理解,为农业营养干预措施的设计和实施提供参考。