Smrekar Martina, Zaletel-Kragelj Lijana, Petrak Olivera, Franko Alenka
University of Applied Health Sciences Zagreb, Mlinarska cesta 38, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, Zaloska 4, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Zdr Varst. 2020 Jun 25;59(3):155-163. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2020-0020. eCollection 2020 Sep.
The aim of the study was to validate the Croatian version of the Sense of Coherence 29-item instrument (SOC-29) within a nursing population.
The cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2017 and June 2018 at the University Hospital Centre Sisters of Mercy (UHCSM) in Zagreb, Croatia. A total of 711 nurses participated in this study. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α), while the structure of the questionnaire was verified by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (method of extraction: principal component analysis (PCA)) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
The instrument demonstrated high internal consistency (α=0.885). PCA analysis has identified five factors that together account for 48% of the variance. However, the observed factors could not be interpreted. In the CFA, none of the models fitted well, although the fit of the three-factor model (CMIN/DF=4.786, CFI=0.767, RMSEA=0.073) was slightly better in comparison with the one-factor model (CMIN/DF=6.072, CFI=0.685, RMSEA=0.084). As the three-factor model in PCA has been shown to be uninterpretable, and all three factors were mutually positive and significantly correlated (correlation coefficients: 0.365-0.521), this indicated a single factor in the background. All items also showed saturation with the first factor (accounting for 25.7% of the variance).
The Croatian version of the SOC-29 instrument successfully fulfilled the necessary psychometric criteria for being used on the population of Croatian nurses. The study proposes that potential users use the single-factor structure.
本研究的目的是在护理人群中验证克罗地亚语版的29项连贯感量表(SOC - 29)。
横断面研究于2017年12月至2018年6月在克罗地亚萨格勒布的慈悲姐妹大学医院中心(UHCSM)进行。共有711名护士参与了本研究。使用克朗巴哈α系数(α)评估内部一致性信度,同时通过探索性因子分析(EFA)(提取方法:主成分分析(PCA))和验证性因子分析(CFA)来验证问卷结构。
该量表显示出较高的内部一致性(α = 0.885)。主成分分析确定了五个因子,它们共同解释了48%的方差。然而,所观察到的因子无法得到合理解释。在验证性因子分析中,尽管三因子模型(CMIN/DF = 4.786,CFI = 0.767,RMSEA = 0.073)的拟合度比单因子模型(CMIN/DF = 6.072,CFI = 0.685,RMSEA = 0.084)稍好,但没有一个模型拟合良好。由于主成分分析中的三因子模型已被证明无法解释,且所有三个因子相互呈正相关且显著相关(相关系数:0.365 - 0.521),这表明背后存在一个单一因子。所有项目在第一个因子上也显示出饱和度(占方差的25.7%)。
克罗地亚语版的SOC - 29量表成功满足了在克罗地亚护士群体中使用所需的心理测量标准。该研究建议潜在用户采用单因子结构。