Enoch Mary Rachel, Nicholson Shauna L
Applied Psychology Department, Antioch University New England, 40 Avon Street, Keene, NH 03431 USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 May 28;13(3):609-617. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00416-z. eCollection 2020 Sep.
The acceptability and understanding of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and relational frame theory (RFT) from the perspective of the practicing Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) are missing in the literature. It has been stated that our field has become stagnant and that the dissemination of the basic research on derived stimulus relations is lacking in its translation to applied work. A survey was used in the present article to collect data on practicing BCBAs' perceptions of ACT and RFT, their acceptability in applied work, and whether they are perceived to be within the scope of applied behavior analysis. The outcomes of the survey suggested a majority of BCBAs acknowledged that ACT is within the scope of ABA ( = 161, 53%), but they do not perceive it as being part of their personal scope of practice ( = 152, 50.16%). Additionally, the outcomes suggested BCBAs acknowledged that RFT is within the scope of applied behavior analysis ( = 190, 62.70%). Furthermore, the outcomes indicated that BCBAs were interested in learning about ACT ( = 275, 90.76%) and RFT ( = 275, 90.76%), although respondents stated the lack of sufficient training in ACT ( = 30, 19.10%) and RFT ( = 21, 19.27%) was a challenge to implementation in applied settings.
文献中缺少从执业的行为分析认证委员会认证行为分析师(BCBA)的角度对接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)和关系框架理论(RFT)的可接受性及理解情况。有人指出,我们这个领域已经停滞不前,关于派生刺激关系的基础研究在向应用工作的转化方面存在不足。本文通过一项调查收集了有关执业BCBA对ACT和RFT的看法、它们在应用工作中的可接受性,以及它们是否被认为属于应用行为分析范畴的数据。调查结果表明,大多数BCBA承认ACT属于应用行为分析的范畴(=161,53%),但他们并不认为ACT是其个人执业范围的一部分(=152,50.16%)。此外,结果表明BCBA承认RFT属于应用行为分析的范畴(=190,62.70%)。此外,结果还表明,BCBA对学习ACT(=275,90.76%)和RFT(=275,90.76%)感兴趣,尽管受访者表示缺乏足够的ACT(=30,19.10%)和RFT(=21,19.27%)培训是在应用环境中实施的一个挑战。