Quet Etienne, Cassel Jean-Christophe, Cosquer Brigitte, Galloux Marine, Pereira De Vasconcelos Anne, Stéphan Aline
Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives et Adaptatives (LNCA), UMR 7364, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Brain Neurosci Adv. 2020 Jul 21;4:2398212820939738. doi: 10.1177/2398212820939738. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
According to the standard theory of memory consolidation, recent memories are stored in the hippocampus before their transfer to cortical modules, a process called systemic consolidation. The ventral midline thalamus (reuniens and rhomboid nuclei, ReRh) takes part in this transfer as its lesion disrupts systemic consolidation of spatial and contextual fear memories. Here, we wondered whether ReRh lesions would also affect the systemic consolidation of another type of memory, namely an olfaction-based social memory. To address this question we focused on social transmission of food preference. Adult Long-Evans rats were subjected to N-methyl-d-aspartate-induced, fibre-sparing lesions of the ReRh nuclei or to a sham-operation, and subsequently trained in a social transmission of food preference paradigm. Retrieval was tested on the next day (recent memory, n = 10, n = 12) or after a 25-day delay (remote memory, n = 10, n = 10). All rats, whether sham-operated or subjected to ReRh lesions, learned and remembered the task normally, whatever the delay. Compared to our former results on spatial and contextual fear memories (Ali et al., 2017; Klein et al., 2019; Loureiro et al., 2012; Quet et al., 2020), the present findings indicate that the ReRh nuclei might not be part of a generic, systemic consolidation mechanism processing all kinds of memories in order to make them persistent. The difference between social transmission of food preference and spatial or contextual fear memories could be explained by the fact that social transmission of food preference is not hippocampus-dependent and that the persistence of social transmission of food preference memory relies on different circuits.
根据记忆巩固的标准理论,近期记忆在转移至皮质模块之前先存储于海马体中,这一过程称为系统巩固。腹侧中线丘脑(中央正中核和菱形核,ReRh)参与了这一转移过程,因为其损伤会破坏空间和情境恐惧记忆的系统巩固。在此,我们想知道ReRh损伤是否也会影响另一种记忆类型的系统巩固,即基于嗅觉的社会记忆。为解决这个问题,我们聚焦于食物偏好的社会传递。成年Long-Evans大鼠接受了N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸诱导的、保留纤维的ReRh核损伤或假手术,随后在食物偏好范式的社会传递中接受训练。在第二天(近期记忆,n = 10,n = 12)或延迟25天后(远期记忆,n = 10,n = 10)测试记忆提取。所有大鼠,无论接受假手术还是ReRh损伤,无论延迟多久,都能正常学习并记住任务。与我们之前关于空间和情境恐惧记忆的研究结果(Ali等人,2017年;Klein等人,2019年;Loureiro等人,2012年;Quet等人,2020年)相比,目前的研究结果表明,ReRh核可能不是处理各种记忆以使其持久的通用系统巩固机制的一部分。食物偏好的社会传递与空间或情境恐惧记忆之间的差异可以通过以下事实来解释:食物偏好的社会传递不依赖海马体,且食物偏好记忆的持久性依赖于不同的神经回路。