Grech Joseph, Sammut Roberta, Buontempo Mariella B, Vassallo Pauline, Calleja Neville
Institute of Applied Sciences, Malta College of Arts, Science and Technology, Paola, Malta.
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Tob Prev Cessat. 2020 Aug 26;6:48. doi: 10.18332/tpc/125353. eCollection 2020.
Although brief smoking cessation interventions that follow the 5As algorithm (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, Arrange) can trigger smokers to quit, routine delivery remains low in Europe. This study aimed to identify the extent of smoking cessation practices of healthcare professionals interested in tobacco cessation, and their opinions and attitudes.
A quantitative, cross-sectional survey design was adopted. Healthcare professionals (n=133) who attended one of ten training sessions on brief interventions for smoking cessation, held every month between September 2018 and June 2019 in Malta, were recruited. Univariate logistic regression and non-parametric tests were carried out to identify associations by participants' characteristics. Potential confounders were ruled out following multivariate analyses.
Most participants were female nurses who had never smoked. While most professionals reportedly asked (76.3%), advised (83.5%) and assessed (70.5%) patients for cessation, fewer provided assistance (40.9%) and arranged followup (24.2%). Compared to other participants, doctors were more likely to have counselled patients over the previous week. Most professionals were favourably disposed towards counselling patients to quit, however, they claimed they had insufficient time to do so. Although most found it difficult to get clients to quit, former smokers were more likely to disagree when compared to those who never smoked (OR=6.86; 95% CI: 2.17-21.71; p=0.001).
While more initiatives to train healthcare professionals in providing smoking cessation interventions are recommended, lack of sufficient time, being an organisational barrier, requires healthcare management exploration and action. Given that former smokers were more confident in helping patients quit, engaging them in training activities would be of added value.
尽管遵循5A算法(询问、建议、评估、协助、安排)的简短戒烟干预措施能够促使吸烟者戒烟,但在欧洲,常规实施率仍然很低。本研究旨在确定对戒烟感兴趣的医护人员的戒烟实践程度,以及他们的意见和态度。
采用定量横断面调查设计。招募了参加2018年9月至2019年6月期间每月在马耳他举办的十次简短戒烟干预培训课程之一的医护人员(n = 133)。进行单因素逻辑回归和非参数检验,以确定参与者特征之间的关联。多因素分析后排除潜在混杂因素。
大多数参与者是从未吸烟的女护士。虽然据报道大多数专业人员会询问(76.3%)、建议(83.5%)和评估(70.5%)患者的戒烟情况,但提供协助(40.9%)和安排随访(24.2%)的较少。与其他参与者相比,医生在前一周更有可能为患者提供咨询。大多数专业人员倾向于为患者提供戒烟咨询,然而,他们声称没有足够的时间这样做。尽管大多数人发现很难让客户戒烟,但与从未吸烟的人相比,曾经吸烟的人更有可能持不同意见(OR = 6.86;95% CI:2.17 - 21.71;p = 0.001)。
虽然建议采取更多举措培训医护人员提供戒烟干预措施,但缺乏足够时间作为组织障碍,需要医疗管理部门进行探索和采取行动。鉴于曾经吸烟的人在帮助患者戒烟方面更有信心,让他们参与培训活动将具有附加价值。