Kananuraks Sarassawan, Assanatham Montira, Boongird Sarinya, Kitiyakara Chagriya, Thammavaranucupt Kanin, Limpijarnkij Thosaphol, Warodomwichit Daruneewan, Davenport Andrew, Nongnuch Arkom
Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Renal Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chakri Naruebodindra Medical Institute, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Jul 17;5(9):1495-1502. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.07.009. eCollection 2020 Sep.
Peri-procedural i.v. fluid administration is important for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). However, standardized fluid management protocols may not be suitable for all patients. We therefore wished to determine whether an individualized fluid administration protocol guided by measuring extracellular water (ECW) using bioimpedance analysis (BIA) would be safe and would reduce the incidence CI-AKI compared to a standardized fluid administration prescription.
In this pilot, randomized, parallel-group, single-blind, controlled trial, we compared the effect of BIA-guided isotonic bicarbonate administration according to the ratio of ECW to total body water (ECW/TBW) to our standard isotonic bicarbonate protocol in regard to the safety and efficacy of preventing CI-AKI in chronic kidney disease patients undergoing elective cardiac angiography. Our primary outcome was the incidence of CI-AKI, which was defined as a ≥0.3 mg/dl or 150% increase in serum creatinine concentration within 48 to 72 hours after cardiac angiography
We studied 61 patients, 30 in the bioimpedance group and 31 in the control group. Age was similar (72.5 ± 7 vs. 71.4 ± 7.9 years), as were body mass index (25.5 vs. 25.8 kg/m) and baseline serum creatinine (1.3 ± 0.3 vs. 1.4 ± 0.4 mg/dl). The peri-procedural fluid volume administered was significantly greater in the BIA-guided hydration group (899.0 ± 252.7 ml vs. 594.4 ± 125.9 ml, < .01). The incidence of CI-AKI was 3.3% in BIA-guided hydration group and 6.5% in the control group (relative risk = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.05-5.40, = 1.00). Adverse events reported were comparable between groups (6.7% vs. 6.5%, = 1.00).
The overall incidence of CI-AKI after cardiac angiography in our patients with mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency was lower than anticipated. Isotonic bicarbonate administration guided by bioimpedance measurements was safe, and probably led to a lower incidence of CI-AKI, although this not reach statistical significance.
围手术期静脉输液对于预防造影剂诱发的急性肾损伤(CI-AKI)很重要。然而,标准化的液体管理方案可能并不适用于所有患者。因此,我们希望确定与标准化输液方案相比,基于生物电阻抗分析(BIA)测量细胞外液(ECW)来指导的个体化输液方案是否安全,以及是否能降低CI-AKI的发生率。
在这项前瞻性、随机、平行组、单盲对照试验中,我们比较了根据ECW与总体水(ECW/TBW)的比值,采用BIA指导输注等渗碳酸氢盐与我们的标准等渗碳酸氢盐方案,在接受择期心脏血管造影的慢性肾病患者中预防CI-AKI的安全性和有效性。我们的主要结局是CI-AKI的发生率,其定义为心脏血管造影后48至72小时内血清肌酐浓度≥0.3mg/dl或升高150%。
我们研究了61例患者,生物电阻抗组30例,对照组31例。年龄相似(72.5±7岁 vs. 71.4±7.9岁),体重指数也相似(25.5 vs. 25.8kg/m²),基线血清肌酐水平也相似(1.3±0.3mg/dl vs. 1.4±0.4mg/dl)。在BIA指导的水化组中围手术期给予的液体量显著更多(899.0±252.7ml vs. 594.4±125.9ml,P<0.01)。BIA指导的水化组中CI-AKI的发生率为3.3%,对照组为6.5%(相对风险=0.52,95%置信区间=0.05-5.40,P=1.00)。两组报告的不良事件相当(6.7% vs. 6.5%,P=1.00)。
在我们轻度至中度肾功能不全的患者中,心脏血管造影后CI-AKI的总体发生率低于预期。通过生物电阻抗测量指导给予等渗碳酸氢盐是安全的,并且可能导致CI-AKI的发生率较低,尽管这未达到统计学显著性。