• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单颗种植体在修复体和黏膜水平的颜色差异的可感知性和可接受性:一项探索性临床研究。

Perceptibility and Acceptability of Color Differences of Single-Tooth Implants at the Restoration and Mucosa Levels: An Exploratory Clinical Study.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Sep/Oct;33(5):487-492. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6470.

DOI:10.11607/ijp.6470
PMID:32956429
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of the present study was to assess the perceptibility and acceptability threshold values for color differentiation at the restoration and mucosa levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One restored single-tooth implant and the contralateral reference tooth were spectrophotometrically assessed in 20 patients. Perceptibility and acceptability were evaluated by dentists, dental technicians, and laypeople.

RESULTS

Dental technicians had the highest sensitivity in the perception of tooth color differences (ΔE = 2.7), followed by dentists (ΔE = 3.3) and laypeople (ΔE = 4.4). Acceptability threshold values were generally higher than perceptibility threshold in all groups. Dental technicians exhibited the highest sensitivity in the perception of mucosa color differences (50% perceptibility at ΔE = 2.65), followed by dentists (ΔE > 3.7) and laypeople (ΔE > 6).

CONCLUSION

Color differences were tolerated with varying degrees among the three groups. Laypeople accepted higher color differences at the mucosa level.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估修复体和黏膜水平颜色区分的可感知性和可接受性阈值。

材料与方法

20 名患者对单颗修复种植牙和对侧同名天然牙进行分光光度评估。可感知性和可接受性由牙医、牙科技师和非专业人士评估。

结果

牙科技师在感知牙齿颜色差异方面的敏感度最高(ΔE=2.7),其次是牙医(ΔE=3.3)和非专业人士(ΔE=4.4)。在所有组中,可接受性阈值值通常高于可感知性阈值。牙科技师在感知黏膜颜色差异方面的敏感度最高(50%可感知性时ΔE=2.65),其次是牙医(ΔE>3.7)和非专业人士(ΔE>6)。

结论

三组人群对颜色差异的容忍度不同。非专业人士在黏膜水平上能接受更高的颜色差异。

相似文献

1
Perceptibility and Acceptability of Color Differences of Single-Tooth Implants at the Restoration and Mucosa Levels: An Exploratory Clinical Study.单颗种植体在修复体和黏膜水平的颜色差异的可感知性和可接受性:一项探索性临床研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 2020 Sep/Oct;33(5):487-492. doi: 10.11607/ijp.6470.
2
Assessment of perceptibility and acceptability of color difference of denture teeth.评价义齿颜色差异的可感知性和可接受性。
J Dent. 2012 Jul;40 Suppl 1:e10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.023. Epub 2012 May 2.
3
Use of a porcelain color discrimination test to evaluate color difference formulas.使用瓷质颜色辨别测试来评估色差公式。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Aug;98(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60043-2.
4
Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch.口腔内确定牙医对颜色不匹配的可察觉性和可接受性的耐受性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Apr;97(4):200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012.
5
Threshold Values for the Perception of Color Changes in Human Teeth.人类牙齿颜色变化感知的阈值
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Nov/Dec;36(6):777-783. doi: 10.11607/prd.2937.
6
Perceptibility and acceptability of CIELAB color differences in computer-simulated teeth.计算机模拟牙齿中CIELAB颜色差异的可感知性与可接受性
J Dent. 2007 Jul;35(7):593-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.03.006. Epub 2007 May 22.
7
Abutment Material Effect on Peri-implant Soft Tissue Color and Perceived Esthetics.基台材料对种植体周围软组织颜色及美学效果的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2016 Dec;25(8):634-640. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12360. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
8
Minimum color differences for discriminating mismatch between composite and tooth color.区分复合材料与牙齿颜色不匹配的最小颜色差异。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2001;13(1):41-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00250.x.
9
Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds for colour differences in dentistry.牙科中颜色差异的可察觉性和可接受性阈值。
J Dent. 2014 Jun;42(6):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
10
Evaluation of esthetic parameters related to a single implant restoration by laypeople and dentists.评价非专业人士和牙医对单个种植体修复的美学参数的看法。
J Prosthet Dent. 2020 Jul;124(1):94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.017. Epub 2019 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Sugary Drinks and Denture Cleanser on Color Stability and Surface Roughness of 3D Printed and CAD-CAM Milled Denture Tooth Materials. An Study.含糖饮料和假牙清洁剂对3D打印及CAD-CAM铣削假牙牙齿材料颜色稳定性和表面粗糙度的影响。一项研究。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S618-S625. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_270_25. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
Perception and Acceptance of Shade Variances in the Smile.微笑中色度差异的感知与接受度
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Aug 16;12(8):260. doi: 10.3390/dj12080260.
3
Color difference between the vita classical shade guide and composite veneers using the dual-layer technique.
使用双层技术的维他经典比色板与复合贴面之间的颜色差异。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2022 Aug 1;14(8):e615-e620. doi: 10.4317/jced.59759. eCollection 2022 Aug.