Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain.
Cátedra Institucional en Docencia, Clínica e Investigación en Fisioterapia: Terapia Manual, Punción Seca y Ejercicio Terapéutico, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Cephalalgia. 2021 Feb;41(2):256-273. doi: 10.1177/0333102420958384. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
This meta-analysis evaluates pressure pain sensitivity values in symptomatic and distant pain-free areas comparing individuals with tension-type headache to controls.
Electronic databases were searched for cross-sectional or prospective case-control studies comparing pressure pain thresholds in patients with tension-type headache to headache-free controls. Data were extracted by three reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. Meta-analyses of trigeminal, extra-trigeminal (neck) and distant pain-free areas in tension-type headache were compared to headache-free controls. Frequency of tension-type headache and gender were taken into account.
Twenty studies were included. Patients with tension-type headache exhibited lower pressure pain thresholds than headache-free controls: Trigeminal (MD -49.11 kPa, 95% CI -66.05 to -32.17), cervical spine (MD -88.17 kPa, 95% CI -108.43 to -67.92) and distant pain-free areas (MD -98.43 kPa, 95% CI -136.78 to -60.09). Differences were significant for chronic, episodic, and mixed episodic and chronic tension-type headache within the trigeminal and neck (symptomatic areas), but only significant for chronic tension-type headache (MD -102.86, 95% CI -139.47 to -66.25 kPa) for distant pain-free areas. In general, women had lower pressure pain thresholds than men. The methodological quality ranged from fair (45%) to good (40%). The results showed a high heterogeneity and publication bias.
This first meta-analysis addressing pressure pain thresholds differences in symptomatic and distant pain-free areas between patients with tension-type headache and controls found low to moderate evidence supporting the presence of pressure pain hypersensitivity in the trigeminal and neck areas in tension-type headache in comparison with headache-free controls. Sensitivity to pressure pain was widespread only in chronic, not episodic, tension-type headache (moderate evidence). https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R29HY.
本荟萃分析评估了紧张型头痛患者与对照组相比,在症状性和无远处疼痛区域的压痛敏感性值。
检索了比较紧张型头痛患者和无头痛对照组的压痛阈值的横断面或前瞻性病例对照研究的电子数据库。由三位审阅者提取数据。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表评估方法学质量。对紧张型头痛的三叉神经、三叉神经外(颈部)和无远处疼痛区域的荟萃分析与无头痛对照组进行了比较。考虑了紧张型头痛的频率和性别。
共纳入 20 项研究。与无头痛对照组相比,紧张型头痛患者的压痛阈值较低:三叉神经(MD-49.11kPa,95%CI-66.05 至-32.17)、颈椎(MD-88.17kPa,95%CI-108.43 至-67.92)和无远处疼痛区域(MD-98.43kPa,95%CI-136.78 至-60.09)。三叉神经和颈部(症状性区域)的慢性、发作性和混合性发作性和慢性紧张型头痛均有显著差异,但无远处疼痛区域仅在慢性紧张型头痛(MD-102.86,95%CI-139.47 至-66.25kPa)有显著差异。一般来说,女性的压痛阈值低于男性。方法学质量从差(45%)到好(40%)不等。结果显示存在高度异质性和发表偏倚。
本荟萃分析首次探讨了紧张型头痛患者与对照组之间在症状性和无远处疼痛区域的压痛阈值差异,发现低至中度证据支持与无头痛对照组相比,紧张型头痛的三叉神经和颈部区域存在压痛敏感性增加。压痛敏感性仅在慢性而非发作性紧张型头痛中广泛存在(中度证据)。https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/R29HY。