National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration South West Peninsula, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Feb;30(2):592-601. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13162. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
We explore the views of managers' knowledge needs and use to optimise care practices and enhance the life experience for older people living, and staff working, in long-term care homes (with and without nursing). This paper contributes to previous research by offering insights into the knowledge types drawn upon and used by managers to inform efforts to better support gaining and mobilising knowledge. Using a pragmatic qualitative approach, we undertook 19 semi-structured interviews with managers and leaders in 15 care homes in the South West of England, varying in geographical location, size and type of ownership. We did a thematic analysis of the data using Framework Analysis. Our interpretations were informed by the existing literature on knowledge types. We identified three themes from our analysis as to managers' knowledge needs and use when implementing changes. First, views about training and formal reports or "explicit knowledge" consisting of the two sub-themes "gaining explicit knowledge" and "research knowledge". Second, perspectives relating to practical experience or "tacit knowledge" and judging the use of knowledge in particular cases or "phronesis". Third, the role of emotion in managers' knowledge needs and use. We found that having knowledge was positively valued by managers and leaders for improving care practices and enhancing the lives of people residing in care homes. Tacit knowledge and phronesis were particularly highly valued and we note challenges with the perceived applicability, relevance and use of research evidence. We identify that emotions are an important component within knowledge use and a need to further understand how to support the emotional wellbeing of managers so they can support care staff and residents. Greater consideration is needed as to how to optimise gaining and mobilising all knowledge types - "know-what," "know-how," "know-when" and "know-feel" - to benefit people living, and staff working, in care homes.
我们探讨了管理人员的知识需求和使用情况,以优化护理实践,提升居住在(有或无护理服务的)长期护理院的老年人的生活体验。本文通过深入了解管理人员所依赖和使用的知识类型,为之前的研究做出了贡献,旨在更好地支持获取和调动知识。我们采用实用主义定性方法,在英格兰西南部的 15 家养老院中对 19 名管理人员和领导者进行了半结构化访谈,这些养老院在地理位置、规模和所有权类型上存在差异。我们使用框架分析对数据进行了主题分析。我们的解释受到了现有知识类型文献的启发。我们从分析中确定了管理人员在实施变革时的知识需求和使用的三个主题。首先,关于培训和正式报告或“显性知识”的观点,包括“获取显性知识”和“研究知识”两个子主题。其次,与实践经验相关的观点或“隐性知识”,以及在特定情况下判断知识的使用或“实践智慧”。第三,情感在管理人员的知识需求和使用中的作用。我们发现,管理人员和领导者认为拥有知识可以改善护理实践,提升居住在护理院的人们的生活质量,因此对知识持积极态度。隐性知识和实践智慧尤其受到高度重视,我们注意到研究证据的适用性、相关性和使用方面存在挑战。我们发现,情感是知识使用的一个重要组成部分,需要进一步了解如何支持管理人员的情绪健康,以便他们能够支持护理人员和居民。需要更多地考虑如何优化获取和调动所有知识类型——“知道是什么”、“知道怎么做”、“知道何时”和“知道感受”——以造福居住在护理院的人和工作人员。