• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
2
Reducing unplanned hospital admissions from care homes: a systematic review.减少养老院的非计划性住院:系统评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(18):1-130. doi: 10.3310/KLPW6338.
3
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.在英国,使用姑息治疗需求评估小组为养老院工作人员和居民提供服务:一项实施科学研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(19):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KRWQ5829.
4
Integrating Palliative Care and Heart Failure: the PalliatHeartSynthesis realist synthesis.将姑息治疗与心力衰竭相结合:PalliatHeartSynthesis 真实综合。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(34):1-128. doi: 10.3310/FTRG5628.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study.养老院员工与护理质量的关系:StaRQ 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(8):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GWTT8143.
7
Causes and solutions to workplace psychological ill-health for nurses, midwives and paramedics: the Care Under Pressure 2 realist review.护士、助产士和护理人员工作场所心理不健康的原因和解决办法:压力下护理 2 真实审查。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(9):1-171. doi: 10.3310/TWDU4109.
8
Deprescribing medicines in older people living with multimorbidity and polypharmacy: the TAILOR evidence synthesis.针对多病共存和多种药物治疗的老年人减药:TAILOR 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Jul;26(32):1-148. doi: 10.3310/AAFO2475.
9
Why do acute healthcare staff behave unprofessionally towards each other and how can these behaviours be reduced? A realist review.医护人员之间为何会出现不专业的行为,又应如何减少此类行为?一项现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(25):1-195. doi: 10.3310/PAMV3758.
10
Practices of falls risk assessment and prevention in acute hospital settings: a realist investigation.急性医院环境中跌倒风险评估与预防的实践:一项实在论调查。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Mar;12(5):1-194. doi: 10.3310/JWQC5771.

引用本文的文献

1
Global burden of urinary tract infections in older women from 1990 to 2021 with projections to 2040: a trend analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990年至2021年老年女性尿路感染的全球负担及到2040年的预测:全球疾病负担研究2021的趋势分析
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jun 26;15:1577777. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1577777. eCollection 2025.
2
Rising Threats and Evolving Trends: Five Years of Urinary Tract Infection Prevalence in a Portuguese Hospital.不断上升的威胁与演变趋势:葡萄牙一家医院五年的尿路感染患病率情况
Clin Pract. 2025 May 26;15(6):100. doi: 10.3390/clinpract15060100.

本文引用的文献

1
Preventing urinary tract infection in older people living in care homes: the 'StOP UTI' realist synthesis.预防养老院老年人的尿路感染:“停止尿路感染”现实主义综述
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Feb 19;34(3):178-189. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016967.
2
Implementing an intervention to reduce use of antibiotics for suspected urinary tract infection in nursing homes - a qualitative study of barriers and enablers based on Normalization Process Theory.实施干预措施以减少养老院疑似尿路感染使用抗生素的情况 - 基于规范进程理论的障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Mar 31;22(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02977-w.
3
Alternative to prophylactic antibiotics for the treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections in women: multicentre, open label, randomised, non-inferiority trial.女性复发性尿路感染预防用抗生素替代疗法:多中心、开放标签、随机、非劣效性试验。
BMJ. 2022 Mar 9;376:e068229. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-0068229.
4
Why are we misdiagnosing urinary tract infection in older patients? A qualitative inquiry and roadmap for staff behaviour change in the emergency department.为何我们会误诊老年患者的尿路感染?一项关于急诊科工作人员行为改变的定性调查及路线图。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2019 Aug;10(4):585-593. doi: 10.1007/s41999-019-00191-3. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
5
Effectiveness of a tailored intervention to reduce antibiotics for urinary tract infections in nursing home residents: a cluster, randomised controlled trial.针对疗养院居民尿路感染减少抗生素使用的定制干预措施的效果:一项集群、随机对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Nov;21(11):1549-1556. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00001-3. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
Use of methenamine hippurate to prevent urinary tract infections in community adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用三聚氰胺乌洛托品预防社区成年女性尿路感染:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Jun 24;71(708):e528-e537. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0833. Print 2021 Jul.
7
Understanding the staff behaviours that promote quality for older people living in long term care facilities: A realist review.理解促进长期护理机构中老年人生活质量的员工行为:一个现实主义的综述。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 May;117:103905. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103905. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
8
A Qualitative Investigation of the Acceptability and Feasibility of a Urinary Tract Infection Patient Information Leaflet for Older Adults and Their Carers.一项关于老年患者及其护理人员的尿路感染患者信息手册的可接受性和可行性的定性研究。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Jan 16;10(1):83. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10010083.
9
Antibiotic prescribing for lower UTI in elderly patients in primary care and risk of bloodstream infection: A cohort study using electronic health records in England.在初级保健中为老年患者下尿路感染开抗生素处方与血流感染风险:一项使用英格兰电子健康记录的队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Sep 21;17(9):e1003336. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003336. eCollection 2020 Sep.
10
The influence of care home managers on the implementation of a complex intervention: findings from the process evaluation of a randomised controlled trial of dementia care mapping.养老院管理者对复杂干预措施实施的影响:痴呆症护理映射随机对照试验过程评价的结果。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Aug 25;20(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01706-5.

养老院内老年人预防尿路感染的策略:StOP UTI 现实综合研究。

Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Richard Wells Research Centre, University of West London, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.

DOI:10.3310/DADT3410
PMID:39432412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11513742/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection is the most diagnosed infection in older people. It accounts for more than 50% of antibiotic prescriptions in care homes and is a frequent reason for care home residents being hospitalised.

OBJECTIVE

This realist review developed and refined programme theories for preventing and recognising urinary tract infection, exploring what works, for whom and in what circumstances.

DESIGN

The review used realist synthesis to explore existing literature on the detection and prevention of urinary tract infection, complemented by stakeholder consultation. It applies to the UK context, although other healthcare systems may identify synergies in our findings.

DATA SOURCES

Bibliographic databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection (including the Social Sciences Citation Index), Sociological Abstracts, Bibliomap and National Institute for Health and Care Research Journals Library.

DATA SELECTION AND EXTRACTION

Title and abstract screening were undertaken by two researchers independently of each other. Selection and assessment were based on relevance and rigour and cross-checked by a second researcher. Data extracted from the included studies were explored for explanations about how the interventions were considered to work (or not). Evidence tables were constructed to enable identification of patterns across studies that offered insight about the features of successful interventions.

DATA ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS

Programme theories were constructed through a four-stage process involving scoping workshops, examination of relevant extant theory, analysis and synthesis of primary research, teacher-learner interviews and a cross-system stakeholder event. A process of abductive and retroductive reasoning was used to construct context-mechanism-outcome configurations to inform programme theory.

RESULTS

The scoping review and stakeholder engagement identified three theory areas that address the prevention and recognition of urinary tract infection and show what is needed to implement best practice. Nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations provided an explanation of how interventions to prevent and recognise urinary tract infection might work in care homes. These were (1) recognition of urinary tract infection is informed by skills in clinical reasoning, (2) decision-support tools enable a whole care team approach to communication, (3) active monitoring is recognised as a legitimate care routine, (4) hydration is recognised as a care priority for all residents, (5) systems are in place to drive action that helps residents to drink more, (6) good infection prevention practice is applied to indwelling urinary catheters, (7) proactive strategies are in place to prevent recurrent urinary tract infection, (8) care home leadership and culture fosters safe fundamental care and (9) developing knowledgeable care teams.

LIMITATIONS

We adapted our approach and work to online interactions with stakeholders and as a research team because of COVID-19. This also had an impact on bringing stakeholders together at a face-to-face event at the end of the project. Studies focusing on the prevention of urinary tract infection in care home settings were predominantly from the USA and Europe where the regulatory and funding systems for the long-term care of the elderly have some differences, particularly in the USA where national reporting plays a significant role in driving improvements in care.

CONCLUSIONS

Care home staff have a vital role in the prevention and recognition of urinary tract infection, which can be enabled through integration and prioritisation within the systems and routines of care homes and delivery of person-centred care. Promoting fundamental care as a means of facilitating a holistic approach to prevention and recognition of urinary tract infection helps staff to recognise how they can contribute to antimicrobial stewardship and recognition of sepsis. Challenging assumptions made by staff about the presentation of urinary tract infection is complex and requires education that facilitates 'unlearning' and questioning of low-value practices. Programmes to prevent urinary tract infection need to be co-designed and supported through active and visible leadership by care home managers with support from specialist practitioners.

FUTURE WORK

We will focus on co-designing tools that facilitate implementation of our findings to ensure they fit with the care home context and address some of the challenges faced by care home leaders. This will underpin action at care home and system levels. Further research is needed to better understand the perspectives of residents and family carers, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and specialist practitioner interventions and non-traditional approaches to training and educating the workforce in care home settings.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020201782.

FUNDING

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130396) and is published in full in ; Vol. 28, No. 68. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

摘要

背景

尿路感染是老年人最常见的感染。它占养老院抗生素处方的 50%以上,也是养老院居民住院的常见原因。

目的

本真实主义综述针对预防和识别尿路感染开发并完善了项目理论,探讨了哪些干预措施有效、针对哪些人群以及在何种情况下有效。

设计

该综述使用真实主义综合方法探讨了尿路感染检测和预防方面的现有文献,辅之以利益相关者咨询。它适用于英国的情况,尽管其他医疗保健系统可能会从我们的研究结果中发现协同作用。

数据来源

检索的文献数据库包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 核心合集(包括社会科学引文索引)、社会学文摘、Bibliomap 和国家卫生与保健研究所期刊图书馆。

数据选择和提取

两名研究人员独立进行标题和摘要筛选。选择和评估基于相关性和严谨性,并由第二名研究人员进行交叉检查。从纳入的研究中提取的数据用于探讨干预措施被认为如何发挥作用(或不发挥作用)的解释。证据表的构建使我们能够识别出研究之间的模式,这些模式为成功干预措施的特点提供了见解。

数据分析和综合

通过四个阶段的过程构建项目理论,包括范围界定研讨会、审查相关现有理论、分析和综合主要研究、师生访谈以及跨系统利益相关者活动。使用归纳和演绎推理的过程构建了上下文-机制-结果配置,以提供项目理论。

结果

范围综述和利益相关者参与确定了三个理论领域,涉及尿路感染的预防和识别,并展示了实施最佳实践所需的条件。九个上下文-机制-结果配置提供了干预措施预防和识别尿路感染的解释,这些配置包括:(1)临床推理技能有助于识别尿路感染,(2)决策支持工具使整个护理团队能够进行沟通,(3)主动监测被认为是合法的护理常规,(4)所有居民都认识到补液是护理的重点,(5)建立了系统来推动有助于居民多喝水的行动,(6)良好的感染预防实践适用于留置导尿管,(7)制定了预防复发性尿路感染的积极策略,(8)养老院领导层和文化促进安全的基本护理,(9)培养有知识的护理团队。

局限性

由于 COVID-19,我们调整了方法和工作方式,以进行在线与利益相关者的互动,并作为一个研究团队。这也对在项目结束时将利益相关者聚集在面对面的活动中产生了影响。关注养老院环境中尿路感染预防的研究主要来自美国和欧洲,那里的老年人长期护理监管和资金系统存在一些差异,尤其是在美国,国家报告在推动护理改善方面发挥着重要作用。

结论

养老院工作人员在预防和识别尿路感染方面发挥着至关重要的作用,可以通过在养老院系统和常规中进行整合和优先排序,以及提供以患者为中心的护理来实现。促进基本护理作为预防和识别尿路感染的整体方法,可以帮助工作人员认识到他们如何为抗菌药物管理和脓毒症的识别做出贡献。改变工作人员对尿路感染表现的假设是复杂的,需要教育来促进“遗忘”和对低价值实践的质疑。预防尿路感染的项目需要由养老院经理通过积极和可见的领导来共同设计和支持,并得到专科医生的支持。

未来工作

我们将专注于共同设计工具,以促进实施我们的研究结果,确保它们与养老院的情况相适应,并解决养老院领导面临的一些挑战。这将支持在养老院和系统层面的行动。需要进一步研究以更好地了解居民和家属的观点、非药物、药物和专科医生干预的效果以及非传统的培训和教育养老院工作人员的方法。

研究注册

本研究已在 PROSPERO CRD42020201782 注册。

资金

该奖项由英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估计划(NIHR 奖号:NIHR130396)资助,并在全文中发表;第 28 卷,第 68 期。请访问 NIHR 资助和奖励网站以获取更多奖项信息。