School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Richard Wells Research Centre, University of West London, London, UK.
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410.
Urinary tract infection is the most diagnosed infection in older people. It accounts for more than 50% of antibiotic prescriptions in care homes and is a frequent reason for care home residents being hospitalised.
This realist review developed and refined programme theories for preventing and recognising urinary tract infection, exploring what works, for whom and in what circumstances.
The review used realist synthesis to explore existing literature on the detection and prevention of urinary tract infection, complemented by stakeholder consultation. It applies to the UK context, although other healthcare systems may identify synergies in our findings.
Bibliographic databases searched included MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection (including the Social Sciences Citation Index), Sociological Abstracts, Bibliomap and National Institute for Health and Care Research Journals Library.
Title and abstract screening were undertaken by two researchers independently of each other. Selection and assessment were based on relevance and rigour and cross-checked by a second researcher. Data extracted from the included studies were explored for explanations about how the interventions were considered to work (or not). Evidence tables were constructed to enable identification of patterns across studies that offered insight about the features of successful interventions.
Programme theories were constructed through a four-stage process involving scoping workshops, examination of relevant extant theory, analysis and synthesis of primary research, teacher-learner interviews and a cross-system stakeholder event. A process of abductive and retroductive reasoning was used to construct context-mechanism-outcome configurations to inform programme theory.
The scoping review and stakeholder engagement identified three theory areas that address the prevention and recognition of urinary tract infection and show what is needed to implement best practice. Nine context-mechanism-outcome configurations provided an explanation of how interventions to prevent and recognise urinary tract infection might work in care homes. These were (1) recognition of urinary tract infection is informed by skills in clinical reasoning, (2) decision-support tools enable a whole care team approach to communication, (3) active monitoring is recognised as a legitimate care routine, (4) hydration is recognised as a care priority for all residents, (5) systems are in place to drive action that helps residents to drink more, (6) good infection prevention practice is applied to indwelling urinary catheters, (7) proactive strategies are in place to prevent recurrent urinary tract infection, (8) care home leadership and culture fosters safe fundamental care and (9) developing knowledgeable care teams.
We adapted our approach and work to online interactions with stakeholders and as a research team because of COVID-19. This also had an impact on bringing stakeholders together at a face-to-face event at the end of the project. Studies focusing on the prevention of urinary tract infection in care home settings were predominantly from the USA and Europe where the regulatory and funding systems for the long-term care of the elderly have some differences, particularly in the USA where national reporting plays a significant role in driving improvements in care.
Care home staff have a vital role in the prevention and recognition of urinary tract infection, which can be enabled through integration and prioritisation within the systems and routines of care homes and delivery of person-centred care. Promoting fundamental care as a means of facilitating a holistic approach to prevention and recognition of urinary tract infection helps staff to recognise how they can contribute to antimicrobial stewardship and recognition of sepsis. Challenging assumptions made by staff about the presentation of urinary tract infection is complex and requires education that facilitates 'unlearning' and questioning of low-value practices. Programmes to prevent urinary tract infection need to be co-designed and supported through active and visible leadership by care home managers with support from specialist practitioners.
We will focus on co-designing tools that facilitate implementation of our findings to ensure they fit with the care home context and address some of the challenges faced by care home leaders. This will underpin action at care home and system levels. Further research is needed to better understand the perspectives of residents and family carers, the effectiveness of non-pharmacological, pharmacological and specialist practitioner interventions and non-traditional approaches to training and educating the workforce in care home settings.
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020201782.
This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130396) and is published in full in ; Vol. 28, No. 68. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
尿路感染是老年人最常见的感染。它占养老院抗生素处方的 50%以上,也是养老院居民住院的常见原因。
本真实主义综述针对预防和识别尿路感染开发并完善了项目理论,探讨了哪些干预措施有效、针对哪些人群以及在何种情况下有效。
该综述使用真实主义综合方法探讨了尿路感染检测和预防方面的现有文献,辅之以利益相关者咨询。它适用于英国的情况,尽管其他医疗保健系统可能会从我们的研究结果中发现协同作用。
检索的文献数据库包括 MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 核心合集(包括社会科学引文索引)、社会学文摘、Bibliomap 和国家卫生与保健研究所期刊图书馆。
两名研究人员独立进行标题和摘要筛选。选择和评估基于相关性和严谨性,并由第二名研究人员进行交叉检查。从纳入的研究中提取的数据用于探讨干预措施被认为如何发挥作用(或不发挥作用)的解释。证据表的构建使我们能够识别出研究之间的模式,这些模式为成功干预措施的特点提供了见解。
通过四个阶段的过程构建项目理论,包括范围界定研讨会、审查相关现有理论、分析和综合主要研究、师生访谈以及跨系统利益相关者活动。使用归纳和演绎推理的过程构建了上下文-机制-结果配置,以提供项目理论。
范围综述和利益相关者参与确定了三个理论领域,涉及尿路感染的预防和识别,并展示了实施最佳实践所需的条件。九个上下文-机制-结果配置提供了干预措施预防和识别尿路感染的解释,这些配置包括:(1)临床推理技能有助于识别尿路感染,(2)决策支持工具使整个护理团队能够进行沟通,(3)主动监测被认为是合法的护理常规,(4)所有居民都认识到补液是护理的重点,(5)建立了系统来推动有助于居民多喝水的行动,(6)良好的感染预防实践适用于留置导尿管,(7)制定了预防复发性尿路感染的积极策略,(8)养老院领导层和文化促进安全的基本护理,(9)培养有知识的护理团队。
由于 COVID-19,我们调整了方法和工作方式,以进行在线与利益相关者的互动,并作为一个研究团队。这也对在项目结束时将利益相关者聚集在面对面的活动中产生了影响。关注养老院环境中尿路感染预防的研究主要来自美国和欧洲,那里的老年人长期护理监管和资金系统存在一些差异,尤其是在美国,国家报告在推动护理改善方面发挥着重要作用。
养老院工作人员在预防和识别尿路感染方面发挥着至关重要的作用,可以通过在养老院系统和常规中进行整合和优先排序,以及提供以患者为中心的护理来实现。促进基本护理作为预防和识别尿路感染的整体方法,可以帮助工作人员认识到他们如何为抗菌药物管理和脓毒症的识别做出贡献。改变工作人员对尿路感染表现的假设是复杂的,需要教育来促进“遗忘”和对低价值实践的质疑。预防尿路感染的项目需要由养老院经理通过积极和可见的领导来共同设计和支持,并得到专科医生的支持。
我们将专注于共同设计工具,以促进实施我们的研究结果,确保它们与养老院的情况相适应,并解决养老院领导面临的一些挑战。这将支持在养老院和系统层面的行动。需要进一步研究以更好地了解居民和家属的观点、非药物、药物和专科医生干预的效果以及非传统的培训和教育养老院工作人员的方法。
本研究已在 PROSPERO CRD42020201782 注册。
该奖项由英国国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)健康技术评估计划(NIHR 奖号:NIHR130396)资助,并在全文中发表;第 28 卷,第 68 期。请访问 NIHR 资助和奖励网站以获取更多奖项信息。