• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新校准细胞和基因治疗的卫生技术评估方法。

Recalibrating Health Technology Assessment Methods for Cell and Gene Therapies.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, Cowdray House, Portugal Street, London, UK.

Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Dec;38(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00956-w.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-020-00956-w
PMID:32960434
Abstract

Recently licensed cell and gene therapies have promising but highly uncertain clinical benefits. They are entering the market at very high prices, with the latest entrants costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. The significant long-term uncertainty posed by these therapies has already complicated the use of conventional economic evaluation approaches such as cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses, which are widely used for assessing the value of new health interventions. Cell and gene therapies also risk jeopardising healthcare systems' financial sustainability. As a result, there is a need to recalibrate the current health technology assessment methods used to measure and compensate their value. In this paper, we outline a set of technical adaptations and methodological refinements to address key challenges in the appraisal of cell and gene therapies' value, including the assessment of efficiency and affordability. We also discuss the potential role of alternative financing mechanisms. Ultimately, uncertainties associated with cell and gene therapies can only be meaningfully addressed by improving the evidence base supporting their approval and adoption in healthcare systems.

摘要

最近获得许可的细胞和基因疗法具有有前途但高度不确定的临床效益。它们以非常高的价格进入市场,最新进入者的成本高达数十万美元。这些疗法带来的重大长期不确定性已经使传统的经济评估方法(如成本效益和成本效用分析)的使用变得复杂,这些方法广泛用于评估新的卫生干预措施的价值。细胞和基因疗法也有可能危及医疗保健系统的财务可持续性。因此,有必要重新调整目前用于衡量和补偿其价值的卫生技术评估方法。在本文中,我们概述了一套技术调整和方法改进,以解决细胞和基因疗法价值评估中的关键挑战,包括效率和负担能力的评估。我们还讨论了替代融资机制的潜在作用。最终,只有通过改善支持其在医疗保健系统中获得批准和采用的证据基础,才能有意义地解决与细胞和基因疗法相关的不确定性。

相似文献

1
Recalibrating Health Technology Assessment Methods for Cell and Gene Therapies.重新校准细胞和基因治疗的卫生技术评估方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Dec;38(12):1297-1308. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00956-w.
2
HTA methodology and value frameworks for evaluation and policy making for cell and gene therapies.用于细胞和基因治疗的评估和决策的 HTA 方法学和价值框架。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Dec;21(9):1421-1437. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01212-w. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
3
Methodological Challenges in the Economic Evaluation of a Gene Therapy for RPE65-Mediated Inherited Retinal Disease: The Value of Vision.RPE65 介导的遗传性视网膜疾病基因治疗的经济评估中的方法学挑战:视觉的价值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Apr;39(4):383-397. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01003-y. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
The assessment and appraisal of regenerative medicines and cell therapy products: an exploration of methods for review, economic evaluation and appraisal.再生医学与细胞治疗产品的评估与评价:审评、经济评估与评价方法探索
Health Technol Assess. 2017 Feb;21(7):1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta21070.
5
6
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
7
Defining and Measuring the Affordability of New Medicines: A Systematic Review.定义和衡量新药的可负担性:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Aug;35(8):777-791. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0514-4.
8
Advanced therapy medicinal products and health technology assessment principles and practices for value-based and sustainable healthcare.先进治疗药物产品和健康技术评估——基于价值和可持续医疗保健的原则和实践。
Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Apr;20(3):427-438. doi: 10.1007/s10198-018-1007-x. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
9
Hemophilia Gene Therapy Value Assessment: Methodological Challenges and Recommendations.血友病基因治疗价值评估:方法学挑战与建议
Value Health. 2021 Nov;24(11):1628-1633. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
10
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (epoetin and darbepoetin) for treating cancer treatment-induced anaemia (including review of technology appraisal no. 142): a systematic review and economic model.促红细胞生成素(依泊汀和达贝泊汀)治疗癌症治疗引起的贫血的有效性和成本效益(包括对技术评估第142号的综述):系统评价和经济模型
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Feb;20(13):1-588, v-vi. doi: 10.3310/hta20130.

引用本文的文献

1
Constraints on delivering cell and gene therapies identified during technology appraisal by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所技术评估期间确定的细胞和基因疗法交付限制因素。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2025 Jul 29;41(1):e56. doi: 10.1017/S0266462325100391.
2
Evidence quality and uncertainties considered in appraisal documents of drugs for rare diseases in England and Germany: a data extraction protocol.英国和德国罕见病药物评估文件中考虑的证据质量与不确定性:一项数据提取方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 16;15(2):e089418. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089418.
3
Market Access Challenges and Solutions in Cell and Gene Therapy in The Netherlands.

本文引用的文献

1
ICER Value Framework 2020 Update: Recommendations on the Aggregation of Benefits and Contextual Considerations.2020 年 ICER 价值框架更新:关于获益聚合和背景因素考量的建议。
Value Health. 2020 Aug;23(8):1040-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.04.1828. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
2
Advancing structured decision-making in drug regulation at the FDA and EMA.推进 FDA 和 EMA 药物监管中的结构化决策。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Feb;87(2):395-405. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14425. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
3
Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009-2018.
荷兰细胞与基因治疗的市场准入挑战与解决方案
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2024 Jul 30;12(3):181-198. doi: 10.3390/jmahp12030015. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Issues, Challenges and Opportunities for Economic Evaluations of Orphan Drugs in Rare Diseases: An Umbrella Review.罕见病孤儿药经济学评价的问题、挑战与机遇:伞式综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(6):619-631. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01370-2. Epub 2024 Apr 14.
5
Cost of implementing CAR-T activity and managing CAR-T patients: an exploratory study.实施嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)疗法活动和管理 CAR-T 患者的成本:一项探索性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10443-5.
6
Pricing and reimbursement mechanisms for advanced therapy medicinal products in 20 countries.20个国家的先进治疗药品定价与报销机制
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Nov 28;14:1199500. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1199500. eCollection 2023.
7
Deliberative processes in health technology assessment of medicines: the case of Spain.药品卫生技术评估中的审议过程:以西班牙为例。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Jul 5;39(1):e50. doi: 10.1017/S0266462323000387.
8
Capturing the Impact of Constraints on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cell and Gene Therapies: A Systematic Review.捕捉约束对细胞和基因治疗的成本效益的影响:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Jun;41(6):675-692. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01234-7. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
9
Gene Therapy for Neuromuscular Diseases: Health Economic Challenges and Future Perspectives.基因治疗神经肌肉疾病:健康经济挑战与未来展望。
J Neuromuscul Dis. 2022;9(6):675-688. doi: 10.3233/JND-221540.
10
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Tisagenlecleucel Versus Blinatumomab in Children and Young Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Partitioned Survival Model to Assess the Impact of an Outcome-Based Payment Arrangement.Tisagenlecleucel 与 Blinatumomab 治疗儿童和青年急性淋巴细胞白血病的成本效益分析:分割生存模型评估基于结果的支付安排的影响。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Feb;41(2):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01188-w. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2009-2018 年新药推向市场所需的研发投资估算。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 3;323(9):844-853. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1166.
4
The Magic of Randomization versus the Myth of Real-World Evidence.随机化的魔力与真实世界证据的神话
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):674-678. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsb1901642.
5
Regulatory approval for autologous human cells and tissue products in the United States, the European Union, and Japan.美国、欧盟和日本对自体人类细胞和组织产品的监管批准。
Regen Ther. 2014 Nov 11;1:45-56. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2014.10.001. eCollection 2015 Jun.
6
Regulatory Framework for Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in Europe and United States.欧美先进治疗药品监管框架
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Aug 30;10:921. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00921. eCollection 2019.
7
The Use of Risk-Sharing Contracts in Healthcare: Theoretical and Empirical Assessments.风险分担合同在医疗保健中的应用:理论和实证评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Dec;37(12):1469-1483. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00838-w.
8
Analytic Considerations in Applying a General Economic Evaluation Reference Case to Gene Therapy.应用一般经济评价参考病例分析基因治疗的考虑因素。
Value Health. 2019 Jun;22(6):661-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.03.012. Epub 2019 May 17.
9
New Cost-Effectiveness Methods to Determine Value-Based Prices for Potential Cures: What Are the Options?新的成本效益方法用于确定潜在治愈方法的基于价值的价格:有哪些选择?
Value Health. 2019 Jun;22(6):656-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 May 17.
10
Estimating Lifetime Benefits Associated with Immuno-Oncology Therapies: Challenges and Approaches for Overall Survival Extrapolations.估算免疫肿瘤疗法相关的终生获益:总体生存外推的挑战与方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Sep;37(9):1129-1138. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00806-4.