• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低度软组织肉瘤:局部疾病控制的适当切缘是多少?

Low-grade soft-tissue sarcomas: What is an adequate margin for local disease control?

机构信息

Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Japan.

Oncology Service, The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.suronc.2020.08.022
PMID:32961431
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whilst the resection margin is an established factor predictive of local control of soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs), the adequacy of margin width for low-grade STSs has been rarely described. We aimed to investigate the margin adequacy and its prognostic relevance in low-grade STSs.

METHODS

109 patients who underwent surgical treatment for a low-grade STS were studied. The prognostic value of margin status was evaluated according to the R-, R+1-classification, and width in millimetres.

RESULTS

The 10-year local recurrence (LR) rates were 6%, 27%, 54% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively (p < 0.001), according to the R-classification. The R+1-classification resulted in a decreased LR rate in R1, but no major differences in LR rates in R0 and R2; 7%, 14%, 54% in R0, R1, and R2, respectively (p < 0.001). When classified by metric distance, 10-year LR rates were 0%, 8%, and 38% by ≥ 2.0 mm, 0.1-1.9 mm, and 0 mm margins, respectively (p < 0.001). Patients with close margins (0.1-1.9 mm) who received adjuvant radiotherapy had a trend toward lower LR risk than those without radiotherapy (10-year, 4% vs. 12%; p = 0.406). The 5 and 10-year disease-specific mortality was 9% and 13%, respectively; margin width was not associated with disease-specific mortality but LR was a poor prognostic factor for survival (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Whilst negative margin provided local control over 90%, excellent local control was achieved with microscopic margins ≥2 mm. The role of margins is more important than radiotherapy in local control. Margins do not determine survival, but LR is associated with a poor prognosis.

摘要

背景

虽然切缘是预测软组织肉瘤(STS)局部控制的一个既定因素,但低级别 STS 的切缘宽度是否足够的描述却很少见。我们旨在研究低级别 STS 的切缘充分性及其预后相关性。

方法

研究了 109 例接受低级别 STS 手术治疗的患者。根据 R-、R+1 分类和毫米数评估切缘状态的预后价值。

结果

根据 R 分类,R0、R1 和 R2 的 10 年局部复发(LR)率分别为 6%、27%和 54%(p<0.001)。R+1 分类导致 R1 的 LR 率降低,但 R0 和 R2 的 LR 率无明显差异;R0、R1 和 R2 的 LR 率分别为 7%、14%和 54%(p<0.001)。按度量距离分类,切缘≥2.0mm、0.1-1.9mm 和 0mm 的 10 年 LR 率分别为 0%、8%和 38%(p<0.001)。接受辅助放疗的切缘较近(0.1-1.9mm)的患者,LR 风险低于未接受放疗的患者(10 年,4%对 12%;p=0.406)。5 年和 10 年的疾病特异性死亡率分别为 9%和 13%;切缘宽度与疾病特异性死亡率无关,但 LR 是生存的不良预后因素(p=0.003)。

结论

尽管阴性切缘提供了超过 90%的局部控制,但微观切缘≥2mm 可实现极佳的局部控制。切缘的作用比放疗更重要,在局部控制中起决定性作用。切缘不决定生存,但 LR 与预后不良相关。

相似文献

1
Low-grade soft-tissue sarcomas: What is an adequate margin for local disease control?低度软组织肉瘤:局部疾病控制的适当切缘是多少?
Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec;35:303-308. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
2
The adequacy of resection margin for non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas.非浸润性软组织肉瘤切缘的充分性。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb;47(2):429-435. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
Impact of resection margin on outcome in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities treated with limb-sparing surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.保肢手术联合术后放疗治疗肢体软组织肉瘤时,切缘状态对预后的影响。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr 26;22(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03380-y.
4
The role of radiotherapy in the treatment of superficial soft-tissue sarcomas.放疗在治疗表浅软组织肉瘤中的作用。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):1088-1094. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2020-0043.R1.
5
What is an adequate margin for infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas?浸润性软组织肉瘤的充分切缘是多少?
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Feb;46(2):277-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 8.
6
The width of resection margins influences local recurrence in soft tissue sarcoma patients.手术切缘宽度影响软组织肉瘤患者的局部复发。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;42(6):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.026. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
7
Analysis of Margin Classification Systems for Assessing the Risk of Local Recurrence After Soft Tissue Sarcoma Resection.软组织肉瘤切除术后局部复发风险评估的边缘分类系统分析。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;36(7):704-709. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.6941. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
8
The significance of close but negative excision margin for treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma.切缘接近但为阴性对软组织肉瘤治疗的意义。
Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Dec;69(6):633-6. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182756afe.
9
What Is the Success of Repeat Surgical Treatment of a Local Recurrence After Initial Wide Resection of Soft Tissue Sarcomas?软组织肉瘤初始广泛切除后局部复发的再次手术治疗的成功率如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Sep;476(9):1791-1800. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000158.
10
Local Control For High-Grade Nonrhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcoma Assigned to Radiation Therapy on ARST0332: A Report From the Childrens Oncology Group.ARST0332 研究中高分级非横纹肌肉瘤软组织肉瘤行放疗的局部控制:儿童肿瘤协作组研究报告。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Jul 1;110(3):821-830. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.01.051. Epub 2021 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Surgical Margin Distance on Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma.手术切缘距离对软组织肉瘤患者局部复发和生存的影响
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Feb 7;61(2):289. doi: 10.3390/medicina61020289.
2
Local relapse patterns after preoperative radiotherapy of limb and trunk wall soft tissue sarcomas: Prognostic role of imaging and pathologic response factors.肢体和躯干壁软组织肉瘤术前放疗后的局部复发模式:影像学和病理反应因素的预后作用。
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2024 Jul 26;48:100825. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100825. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Giant Cell Tumor of Soft Tissue: An Updated Review.
软组织巨细胞瘤:最新综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 13;13(10):2870. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102870.
4
Keratin-Positive Giant Cell-Rich Tumor: A Review and Update.富含角蛋白阳性巨细胞的肿瘤:综述与更新
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 20;16(10):1940. doi: 10.3390/cancers16101940.
5
Recent Advances in the Diagnosis, Pathogenesis, and Management of Myxoinflammatory Fibroblastic Sarcoma.黏液炎症性纤维肉瘤的诊断、发病机制和治疗的最新进展。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 17;25(2):1127. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021127.
6
Clinical Outcome of Low-Grade Myofibroblastic Sarcoma in Japan: A Multicenter Study from the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group.日本低度肌成纤维细胞肉瘤的临床结局:来自日本肌肉骨骼肿瘤学组的多中心研究
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Apr 15;15(8):2314. doi: 10.3390/cancers15082314.
7
[Multimodal treatment of localized high-grade soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities : Summary and discussion of the current S3 guidelines on adult soft tissue sarcomas and the ESMO guidelines on soft tissue and visceral sarcomas].[肢体局限性高级别软组织肉瘤的多模式治疗:成人软组织肉瘤当前S3指南及软组织和内脏肉瘤ESMO指南的总结与讨论]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 May;94(5):424-431. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01872-3. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
8
The significance of margins in pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas: Consensus on surgical margin definition harmonization from the INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT).儿科非横纹肌肉瘤软组织肉瘤切缘的意义:来自国际软组织肉瘤研究协作组(INSTRuCT)的手术切缘定义协调共识。
Cancer Med. 2023 May;12(10):11719-11730. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5671. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
9
Surgical Margins in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Management and Corresponding Local and Systemic Recurrence Rates: A Retrospective Study Covering 11 Years and 169 Patients in a Single Institution.软组织肉瘤治疗中的手术切缘及相应的局部和全身复发率:一项涵盖单一机构11年及169例患者的回顾性研究
Life (Basel). 2022 Oct 25;12(11):1694. doi: 10.3390/life12111694.
10
Surgical Margins in Canine Cutaneous Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Dichotomous Classification System Does Not Accurately Predict the Risk of Local Recurrence.犬皮肤软组织肉瘤的手术切缘:二分法分类系统不能准确预测局部复发风险。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Aug 11;11(8):2367. doi: 10.3390/ani11082367.