University Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hamostaseologie. 2020 Nov;40(4):420-429. doi: 10.1055/a-1227-8008. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
The use of laboratory biomarkers in clinical practice is rapidly increasing. Laboratory tests are, however, rarely evaluated adequately before implementation, and the utility of many tests is essentially unclear. An important reason for this knowledge gap is that a comprehensive and generally accepted methodological framework supporting evaluation studies is essentially lacking. Researchers, clinicians, and decision-makers are often not aware of the methodological tools available and face problems with the appraisal of a test's utility. With the present article, I aim to summarize current concepts and methodological tools and propose a framework for a phased approach that could be used in future evaluation projects. Future research will refine this suggested framework by identifying problems in current evaluation projects, specifying methodological criteria for all phases, as well as developing advanced methodological tools.
实验室生物标志物在临床实践中的应用正在迅速增加。然而,在实施之前,实验室检测很少得到充分的评估,许多检测的实用性基本上也不清楚。造成这一知识空白的一个重要原因是,缺乏一个全面且被普遍接受的方法学框架来支持评估研究。研究人员、临床医生和决策者往往不知道可用的方法学工具,并且在评估测试的实用性方面存在问题。本文旨在总结当前的概念和方法学工具,并提出一个分阶段方法的框架,可用于未来的评估项目。未来的研究将通过确定当前评估项目中的问题来完善这一建议框架,为所有阶段指定方法学标准,并开发先进的方法学工具。