• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线耐药相关替换对慢性丙型肝炎患者 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 疗效的影响:一项荟萃分析。

Effect of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the efficiency of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in chronic hepatitis C subjects: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

出版信息

J Viral Hepat. 2021 Jan;28(1):177-185. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13409. Epub 2020 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1111/jvh.13409
PMID:32961624
Abstract

The effect of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects has drawn considerable attention. However, it has been reported that the relationship between such substitutions and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects is variable in different treatments. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship in subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. A systematic literature search up to May 2020 was done, and 17 studies were identified with 6501 chronic hepatitis C subjects. They were reporting relationships between baseline resistance-associated substitutions and sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir. The odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated to evaluate the prognostic role of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir using the dichotomous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Lower sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment in chronic hepatitis C subjects was significantly related to baseline resistance-associated substitutions in overall genotypes (OR, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.15-0.61, P < .001), baseline NS5a resistance-associated substitutions in genotype-1 (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.57, P = .005), baseline resistance-associated substitutions in genotype-3 (OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.38, P < .001), and baseline NS5a resistance-associated substitutions in genotype-3 (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.49, P < .001). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects was not significantly related to the baseline NS5a resistance-associated substitutions (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.17-2.22, P = .45), and baseline resistance-associated substitutions in genotype-1 (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12-1.088, P = .07). In conclusion, the impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in chronic hepatitis C subjects treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir may have a great prognostic effect, especially in genotype-3 as a tool to improve treatment prediction. Chronic hepatitis C subjects with baseline resistance-associated substitutions may have an independent risk relationship with poor treatment outcomes. This relationship forces us to recommend testing prior to treatment selection to avoid any possible treatment failure.

摘要

基线耐药相关替换对慢性丙型肝炎患者 12 周持续病毒学应答的影响引起了广泛关注。然而,据报道,在不同治疗中,这些替换与慢性丙型肝炎患者 12 周持续病毒学应答之间的关系是可变的。本荟萃分析旨在评估在使用 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 治疗的患者中这种关系。对截至 2020 年 5 月的系统文献检索确定了 17 项研究,其中包括 6501 例慢性丙型肝炎患者。这些研究报告了基线耐药相关替换与使用 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者 12 周持续病毒学应答之间的关系。使用二项分类方法,采用随机或固定效应模型,计算优势比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI),以评估基线耐药相关替换对慢性丙型肝炎患者 12 周持续病毒学应答的预后作用。总体基因型(OR,0.03;95%CI,0.15-0.61,P<.001)、基因型 1 基线 NS5a 耐药相关替换(OR,0.16;95%CI,0.04-0.57,P=0.005)、基因型 3 基线耐药相关替换(OR,0.14;95%CI,0.05-0.38,P<.001)和基因型 3 基线 NS5a 耐药相关替换(OR,0.21;95%CI,0.09-0.49,P<.001)与慢性丙型肝炎患者 12 周时持续病毒学应答较低显著相关。慢性丙型肝炎患者 12 周时持续病毒学应答与基线 NS5a 耐药相关替换(OR,0.61;95%CI,0.17-2.22,P=0.45)和基因型 1 基线耐药相关替换(OR,0.35;95%CI,0.12-1.088,P=0.07)无显著相关性。总之,glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 治疗的慢性丙型肝炎患者基线耐药相关替换对 12 周持续病毒学应答的影响可能具有重要的预后作用,尤其是在基因型 3 中,作为改善治疗预测的工具。具有基线耐药相关替换的慢性丙型肝炎患者可能与较差的治疗结局存在独立的风险关系。这种关系迫使我们建议在治疗选择之前进行检测,以避免任何可能的治疗失败。

相似文献

1
Effect of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the efficiency of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in chronic hepatitis C subjects: A meta-analysis.基线耐药相关替换对慢性丙型肝炎患者 glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 疗效的影响:一项荟萃分析。
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Jan;28(1):177-185. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13409. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
2
Resistance Analysis of a 3-Day Monotherapy Study with Glecaprevir or Pibrentasvir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection.慢性丙型肝炎病毒基因 1 型感染患者使用格卡瑞韦或哌仑他韦进行 3 天单药治疗的耐药性分析。
Viruses. 2018 Aug 28;10(9):462. doi: 10.3390/v10090462.
3
Pooled Resistance Analysis in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 to 6 Infection Treated with Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials.在 HCV 基因 1 型至 6 型感染患者中,对 Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir 的 pooled 耐药分析,在 2 期和 3 期临床试验中。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Sep 24;62(10). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01249-18. Print 2018 Oct.
4
Systematic review with meta-analysis: impact of baseline resistance-associated substitutions on the efficacy of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir among chronic hepatitis C patients.系统评价和荟萃分析:基线耐药相关突变对慢性丙型肝炎患者使用格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦治疗效果的影响。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020 Mar;51(5):490-504. doi: 10.1111/apt.15633. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
5
Integrated Resistance Analysis of CERTAIN-1 and CERTAIN-2 Studies in Hepatitis C Virus-Infected Patients Receiving Glecaprevir and Pibrentasvir in Japan.在日本接受格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦和哌仑他韦治疗的丙型肝炎病毒感染患者中 CERTAIN-1 和 CERTAIN-2 研究的综合耐药分析。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Jan 25;62(2). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02217-17. Print 2018 Feb.
6
Simplified monitoring for hepatitis C virus treatment with glecaprevir plus pibrentasvir, a randomised non-inferiority trial.格卡瑞韦哌仑他韦联合治疗丙型肝炎病毒的简化监测:一项随机非劣效性试验。
J Hepatol. 2020 Mar;72(3):431-440. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.010. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
7
NS5A-P32 deletion as a factor involved in virologic failure in patients receiving glecaprevir and pibrentasvir.NS5A-P32 缺失是导致接受 glecaprevir 和 pibrentasvir 治疗的患者病毒学失败的一个因素。
J Gastroenterol. 2019 May;54(5):459-470. doi: 10.1007/s00535-018-01543-9. Epub 2019 Jan 5.
8
Durability of sustained virological response to glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and resistance development: A long-term follow-up study.格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦持续病毒学应答的持久性和耐药性发展:一项长期随访研究。
Liver Int. 2022 Jun;42(6):1278-1286. doi: 10.1111/liv.15211. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
9
Glecaprevir/pibrentasvir for 8 weeks in treatment-naïve patients with chronic HCV genotypes 1-6 and compensated cirrhosis: The EXPEDITION-8 trial.格卡瑞韦/哌仑他韦治疗初治慢性 HCV 基因型 1-6 且代偿期肝硬化患者 8 周:EXPEDITION-8 试验。
J Hepatol. 2020 Mar;72(3):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
10
Eight Weeks of Treatment With Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir Is Safe and Efficacious in an Integrated Analysis of Treatment-Naïve Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection.在初治丙型肝炎病毒感染患者的综合分析中,glecaprevir/pibrentasvir治疗八周安全有效。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Oct;18(11):2544-2553.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.06.044. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of direct-acting antiviral regimens on hepatic and extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C virus infection.直接作用抗病毒方案对丙型肝炎病毒感染的肝脏和肝外表现的影响。
World J Hepatol. 2022 Jun 27;14(6):1053-1073. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i6.1053.
2
Therapeutic potential of pyrrole and pyrrolidine analogs: an update.吡咯和吡咯烷类似物的治疗潜力:最新研究进展。
Mol Divers. 2022 Oct;26(5):2915-2937. doi: 10.1007/s11030-022-10387-8. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
3
Hepatitis C virus treatment failure: Clinical utility for testing resistance-associated substitutions.
丙型肝炎病毒治疗失败:检测耐药相关替代位点的临床应用
World J Hepatol. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):1069-1078. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1069.
4
Virological Factors Associated with Failure to the Latest Generation of Direct Acting Agents (DAA) and Re-Treatment Strategy: A Narrative Review.与最新一代直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)失败相关的病毒学因素及再治疗策略:叙述性综述。
Viruses. 2021 Mar 8;13(3):432. doi: 10.3390/v13030432.