Suppr超能文献

异丙酚和七氟醚对肝血流的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on hepatic blood flow: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.

Department of General and Hepatic-pancreatico-biliary Surgery and Liver transplantation, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Sep 22;20(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01150-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Maintaining adequate perioperative hepatic blood flow (HBF) supply is essential for preservation of postoperative normal liver function. Propofol and sevoflurane affect arterial and portal HBF. Previous studies have suggested that propofol increases total HBF, primarily by increasing portal HBF, while sevoflurane has only minimal effect on total HBF. Primary objective was to compare the effect of propofol (group P) and sevoflurane (group S) on arterial, portal and total HBF and on the caval and portal vein pressure during major abdominal surgery. The study was performed in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy because - in contrast to hepatic surgical procedures - this is a standardized surgical procedure without potential anticipated severe hemodynamic disturbances, and it allows direct access to the hepatic blood vessels.

METHODS

Patients were randomized according to the type of anesthetic drug used. For both groups, Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring was used to monitor depth of anesthesia. All patients received goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) guided by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique. Hemodynamic data were measured, recorded and guided by Pulsioflex™. Arterial, portal and total HBF were measured directly, using ultrasound transit time flow measurements (TTFM) and were related to hemodynamic variables.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included. There was no significant difference between groups in arterial, portal and total HBF. As a result of the GDHT, pre-set hemodynamic targets were obtained in both groups, but MAP was significantly lower in group S (p = 0.01). In order to obtain these pre-set hemodynamic targets, group S necessitated a significantly higher need for vasopressor support (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Hepatic blood flow was similar under a propofol-based and a sevoflurane-based anesthetic regimen. Related to the application of GDHT, pre-set hemodynamic goals were maintained in both groups, but sevoflurane-anaesthetized patients had a significantly higher need for vasopressor support.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Study protocol number is AGO/2017/002 - EC/2017/0164. EudraCT number is 2017-000071-90. Clin.trail.gov, NCT03772106 , Registered 4/12/2018, retrospective registered.

摘要

背景

维持足够的围手术期肝血流(HBF)供应对于维持术后正常肝功能至关重要。丙泊酚和七氟醚会影响动脉和门静脉 HBF。先前的研究表明,丙泊酚增加总 HBF,主要通过增加门静脉 HBF,而七氟醚对总 HBF 的影响很小。主要目的是比较丙泊酚(P 组)和七氟醚(S 组)对大腹部手术后动脉、门静脉和总 HBF 以及腔静脉和门静脉压力的影响。该研究在接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者中进行,因为与肝外科手术不同,这是一种标准化的手术程序,没有潜在的严重血流动力学紊乱,并且可以直接进入肝血管。

方法

患者根据使用的麻醉药物类型随机分组。对于两组患者,均使用脑电双频指数(BIS)监测来监测麻醉深度。所有患者均接受基于目标导向血流动力学治疗(GDHT)的治疗,该治疗由经肺热稀释技术指导。血流动力学数据通过 Pulsioflex™进行测量、记录和指导。使用超声瞬态时间流量测量(TTFM)直接测量动脉、门静脉和总 HBF,并与血流动力学变量相关联。

结果

共纳入 18 名患者。两组患者的动脉、门静脉和总 HBF 无显著差异。由于 GDHT,两组均获得了预设的血流动力学目标,但 S 组的 MAP 显著较低(p=0.01)。为了获得这些预设的血流动力学目标,S 组需要显著更高的血管加压支持(p<0.01)。

结论

基于丙泊酚和七氟醚的麻醉方案下,肝血流相似。与 GDHT 的应用相关,两组均维持预设的血流动力学目标,但七氟醚麻醉患者需要更高的血管加压支持。

试验注册

研究方案编号为 AGO/2017/002-EC/2017/0164。EudraCT 编号为 2017-000071-90。Clin.trail.gov,NCT03772106,2018 年 4 月 12 日注册,回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20b3/7507611/7ab476a23610/12871_2020_1150_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验