Department of Orthopedics, Kashani Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Department of Orthopedics, Kashani Hospital, Isfahan, Iran.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Nov;106(7):1345-1351. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.04.020. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
Knee angular deformity is a common finding occurring in the childhood that can cause gait disturbances and early compartment osteoarthritis. Despite various surgical approaches presented to correct the angular deformities of the knee, there is still a search for the best approach. Thus, the present study was conducted to compare the results of using cannulated screw (CS) versus screw plus reconstruction plate (SpRP) for correction of angular deformities through a two-year follow-up study.
Percutaneous CS implantation is as efficacious as SpRP implantation for the correction of angular deformities of the knee.
This randomised clinical trial (RCT) was conducted on 63 patients with angular deformities who were randomly divided into two groups including treatment with cannulated screw (CS) (n=32) and treatment with screw plus reconstruction plate (SpRP) (n=31). All the patients underwent the alignment view radiography of both lower limbs before surgical procedure and then within 3, 6, 12, 18 months and 2 years following the surgery. Afterwards, the patients' mechanical axis of the knees, medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and varus/valgus angles were assessed and compared.
Results of the study showed that MPTA and LDFA significantly turned to the normal range during the 18 months follow-up in both treatment groups (p-value<0.001). Varus and valgus angles were corrected in both techniques as well postoperatively (p-value<0.001). Ultimate correction was achieved earlier in the CS treated group (12 months versus 18 months later).
Findings of the study revealed that the percutaneous CS implantation was successful similar to the SpRP implantation for correction of the angular deformity, while earlier ultimate angular correction and less pain complaint were among the superiorities of the CS.
II, comparative prospective study.
膝关节角度畸形是儿童中常见的现象,可导致步态障碍和早期关节间骨关节炎。尽管已经提出了各种手术方法来矫正膝关节的角度畸形,但仍在寻找最佳方法。因此,本研究旨在通过为期两年的随访研究比较使用空心螺钉(CS)与螺钉加重建钢板(SpRP)矫正角度畸形的结果。
经皮 CS 植入与 SpRP 植入在矫正膝关节角度畸形方面同样有效。
这是一项随机临床试验(RCT),共纳入 63 例角度畸形患者,随机分为两组,分别采用空心螺钉(CS)治疗(n=32)和螺钉加重建钢板(SpRP)治疗(n=31)。所有患者在手术前和术后 3、6、12、18 个月及 2 年进行下肢对线位 X 线检查。然后评估并比较患者膝关节机械轴、内侧胫骨近端角(MPTA)、外侧股骨远端角(LDFA)和内翻/外翻角度。
研究结果表明,两组患者的 MPTA 和 LDFA 在 18 个月的随访期间均显著转为正常范围(p 值均<0.001)。两种技术在术后也都纠正了内翻和外翻角度(p 值均<0.001)。CS 治疗组更早达到最终矫正(12 个月与 18 个月后)。
研究结果表明,经皮 CS 植入与 SpRP 植入在矫正角度畸形方面同样成功,而 CS 具有更早达到最终矫正和更少疼痛的优势。
II 级,前瞻性比较研究。