Sillesen H, Schroeder T, Steenberg H J, Hansen H J
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1987 Apr;13(4):177-81. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(87)90119-0.
The periorbital flow direction and internal carotid artery (ICA) angiogram were compared to the ICA pressure gradient across the stenosis and the distal ICA pressure in 51 patients subjected to carotid endarterectomy. All 17 patients with inverted periorbital flow had stenoses exceeding 50%. The remaining 16 patients with the same degree of stenosis had antegrade flow, which was also observed in all patients with less than 50% stenosis. In 16 of 17 patients with inverted periorbital flow, the mean pressure gradient exceeded 10 mmHg, whereas 33 of 34 patients with antegrade flow had gradients of 12 mmHg or less. For diagnostic purpose, the periorbital Doppler test is inferior to direct Doppler examination or angiography. However, as an adjunct to direct techniques, patients can be classified into 3 groups: Patients with less than 50% stenosis, Patients with 50% stenosis or more and good collaterals and, Patients with 50% stenosis or more and insufficient collaterals.
对51例行颈动脉内膜切除术的患者,将眶周血流方向和颈内动脉(ICA)血管造影与狭窄处的ICA压力梯度及ICA远端压力进行了比较。所有17例眶周血流反向的患者狭窄程度均超过50%。其余16例狭窄程度相同的患者血流为顺行,所有狭窄程度小于50%的患者也观察到顺行血流。17例眶周血流反向的患者中有16例平均压力梯度超过10 mmHg,而34例顺行血流患者中有33例压力梯度为12 mmHg或更低。用于诊断目的时,眶周多普勒检查不如直接多普勒检查或血管造影。然而,作为直接技术的辅助手段,患者可分为3组:狭窄程度小于50%的患者、狭窄程度为50%或更高且侧支循环良好的患者以及狭窄程度为50%或更高且侧支循环不足的患者。