Fukumoto Wataru, Nagaoka Mami, Higaki Toru, Tatsugami Fuminari, Nakamura Yuko, Oostveen Luuk, Klein Willemijn, Prokop Mathias, Awai Kazuo
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Institute of Biomedical Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan.
School of Medicine, Hiroshima University, Japan.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 Sep 8;7:100253. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100253. eCollection 2020.
In this phantom- and cadaver study we investigated the differences of coronary artery calcium (CAC) volume on ultra-high-resolution computed tomography (U-HRCT) scans and conventional CT.
We scanned a coronary calcium phantom and the coronary arteries of five cadavers using U-HRCT in normal- and super-high resolution (NR, SHR) mode. The NR mode was similar to conventional CT; 896 detector channels, a matrix size of 512, and a slice thickness of 0.5 mm were applied. In SHR mode, we used 1792 detector channels, a matrix size of 1024, and a slice thickness of 0.25 mm. The CAC volume on NR- and SHR images were recorded. Differences in the physical- and the calculated CAC volume were defined as the error value and compared between NR- and SHR images of the phantom. Differences between the CAC volume on NR- and SHR scans of the cadavers were also recorded.
The mean error value was lower on SHR- than NR images of the phantom (14.0 %, SD 11.1 vs 20.1 %, SD 15.2, p = 0.01). The mean CAC volume was significantly higher on SHR- than NR images of the cadavers (153.4 mm, SD 161.0 vs 144.7 mm, SD 164.8, p < 0.01).
As small calcifications were more clearly visualized on U-HRCT images in SHR mode than on conventional (NR) CT scans, SHR imaging may facilitate the accurate quantification of the CAC.
在本模型和尸体研究中,我们调查了超高分辨率计算机断层扫描(U-HRCT)和传统CT扫描在冠状动脉钙化(CAC)体积上的差异。
我们使用U-HRCT的正常分辨率和超高分辨率(NR,SHR)模式扫描了一个冠状动脉钙化模型和五具尸体的冠状动脉。NR模式类似于传统CT;应用了896个探测器通道、512的矩阵大小和0.5毫米的层厚。在SHR模式下,我们使用了1792个探测器通道、1024的矩阵大小和0.25毫米的层厚。记录NR和SHR图像上的CAC体积。将物理和计算得到的CAC体积差异定义为误差值,并在模型的NR和SHR图像之间进行比较。还记录了尸体NR和SHR扫描的CAC体积差异。
模型的SHR图像的平均误差值低于NR图像(14.0%,标准差11.1对20.1%,标准差15.2,p = 0.01)。尸体的SHR图像的平均CAC体积显著高于NR图像(153.4毫米,标准差161.0对144.7毫米,标准差164.8,p < 0.01)。
由于在SHR模式下U-HRCT图像上的小钙化比传统(NR)CT扫描更清晰可见,SHR成像可能有助于准确量化CAC。