Suppr超能文献

衡量纽约市健康心脏项目实施策略的保真度:一项在初级保健中运用实践促进的复杂干预措施。

Measuring Implementation Strategy Fidelity in HealthyHearts NYC: A Complex Intervention Using Practice Facilitation in Primary Care.

作者信息

Berry Carolyn A, Nguyen Ann M, Cuthel Allison M, Cleland Charles M, Siman Nina, Pham-Singer Hang, Shelley Donna R

机构信息

NYU Langone Health, New York, NY New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY New York University, New York, NY.

出版信息

Am J Med Qual. 2021;36(4):270-276. doi: 10.1177/1062860620959450.

Abstract

Few studies have assessed the fidelity of practice facilitation (PF) as an implementation strategy, and none have used an a priori definition or conceptual framework of fidelity to guide fidelity assessment. The authors adapted the Conceptual Framework for Implementation Fidelity to guide fidelity assessment in HealthyHearts NYC, an intervention that used PF to improve adoption of cardiovascular disease evidence-based guidelines in primary care practices. Data from a web-based tracking system of 257 practices measured fidelity using 4 categories: frequency, duration, content, and coverage. Almost all (94.2%) practices received at least the required 13 PF visits. Facilitators spent on average 26.3 hours at each site. Most practices (95.7%) completed all Task List items, and 71.2% were educated on all Chronic Care Model strategies. The majority (65.8%) received full coverage. This study provides a model that practice managers and implementers can use to evaluate fidelity of PF, and potentially other implementation strategies.

摘要

很少有研究评估实践促进(PF)作为一种实施策略的保真度,而且没有一项研究使用保真度的先验定义或概念框架来指导保真度评估。作者采用了实施保真度概念框架来指导纽约市健康心脏项目中的保真度评估,该干预措施利用PF来提高初级保健实践中对心血管疾病循证指南的采用率。来自一个基于网络的跟踪系统对257个实践的数据,使用频率、持续时间、内容和覆盖范围4个类别来衡量保真度。几乎所有(94.2%)的实践至少接受了所需的13次PF访问。促进者在每个地点平均花费26.3小时。大多数实践(95.7%)完成了所有任务列表项目,71.2%接受了所有慢性病护理模式策略的培训。大多数(65.8%)获得了全面覆盖。本研究提供了一个模型,实践管理者和实施者可以用来评估PF以及潜在的其他实施策略的保真度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验