Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Feb 16;12(2):335-342. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab138.
Implementation strategies are systematic approaches to improve the uptake and sustainability of evidence-based interventions. They frequently focus on changing provider behavior through the provision of interventions such as training, coaching, and audit-and-feedback. Implementation strategies often impact intermediate behavioral outcomes like provider guideline adherence, in turn improving patient outcomes. Fidelity of implementation strategy delivery is defined as the extent to which an implementation strategy is carried out as it was designed. Implementation strategy fidelity measurement is under-developed and under-reported, with the quality of reporting decreasing over time. Benefits of fidelity measurement include the exploration of the extent to which observed effects are moderated by fidelity, and critical information about Type-III research errors, or the likelihood that null findings result from implementation strategy fidelity failure. Reviews of implementation strategy efficacy often report wide variation across studies, commonly calling for increased implementation strategy fidelity measurement to help explain variations. Despite the methodological benefits of rigorous fidelity measurement, implementation researchers face multi-level challenges and complexities. Challenges include the measurement of a complex variable, multiple data collection modalities with varying precision and costs, and the need for fidelity measurement to change in-step with adaptations. In this position paper, we weigh these costs and benefits and ultimately contend that implementation strategy fidelity measurement and reporting should be improved in trials of implementation strategies. We offer pragmatic solutions for researchers to make immediate improvements like the use of mixed methods or innovative data collection and analysis techniques, the inclusion of implementation strategy fidelity assessment in reporting guidelines, and the staged development of fidelity tools across the evolution of an implementation strategy. We also call for additional research into the barriers and facilitators of implementation strategy fidelity measurement to further clarify the best path forward.
实施策略是系统的方法,旨在提高基于证据的干预措施的采用率和可持续性。它们通常通过提供培训、辅导和审核反馈等干预措施来关注改变提供者的行为。实施策略通常会影响中间性行为结果,如提供者遵循指南的情况,从而改善患者的结果。实施策略的实施策略的保真度定义为实施策略实施的程度,就像它的设计一样。实施策略保真度测量方法尚未开发和报告不足,随着时间的推移,报告质量下降。保真度测量的好处包括探索观察到的效果是否因保真度而受到调节的程度,以及关于 III 型研究误差的关键信息,或者无效结果是否是由于实施策略保真度失败导致的。实施策略效果的综述报告经常显示研究之间存在广泛的差异,通常呼吁提高实施策略的保真度测量,以帮助解释差异。尽管严格的保真度测量具有方法学上的好处,但实施研究人员面临着多层次的挑战和复杂性。挑战包括对复杂变量的测量、具有不同精度和成本的多种数据收集模式,以及保真度测量需要随着适应而同步变化的需求。在这份立场文件中,我们权衡了这些成本和收益,最终认为应该在实施策略的试验中改进实施策略的保真度测量和报告。我们为研究人员提供了实用的解决方案,例如使用混合方法或创新的数据收集和分析技术,在报告指南中纳入实施策略保真度评估,以及在实施策略的演变过程中逐步开发保真度工具,从而可以立即进行改进。我们还呼吁对实施策略保真度测量的障碍和促进因素进行更多研究,以进一步阐明最佳前进道路。