• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述选择坐姿和站姿排尿的男性的排尿体验。

Characterizing voiding experiences of men choosing seated and standing positions.

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.

Department of Medicine, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2509-2519. doi: 10.1002/nau.24523. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1002/nau.24523
PMID:32965063
Abstract

AIMS

Voiding positions and preferences in men are not well characterized. In this study, we aim to understand the interplay of voiding characteristics and their impact on voiding position.

METHODS

We designed a 27-item survey to assess voiding characteristics and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) severity in men seen in urology and other outpatient clinics. Participants included adult men patients and adult men accompanying patients at our institution's outpatient clinics. Data collected included demographics, International Prostate Symptom Score questionnaire, stream type (single, split, and dribble), voiding behavior, positional stream quality, and voiding bother.

RESULTS

We received 195 completed surveys (80% response rate). Of men queried, 18% (35/195) preferred to sit while voiding. Overall, men who sit had a higher proportion of LUTS (66% [23/35] vs. 41% [66/160]; p = .01), more physical limitations affecting voiding choice (20% [7/35] vs. 3% [5/160]; (p = .001), and a lower desire to stand (6% [2/35] vs. 24% [38/160]; p = .02), compared to men who stand. Men who sit while voiding reported nearly double the amount of voiding associated bother (34% [12/35]) compared to men who stand (18% [28/160]; p = .04). Older aged men reported a similar rate of seated urination compared to younger men. The most common reasons to void seated included comfort and avoidance of spraying.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings discourage the use of anecdotal beliefs founded on generalizable characteristics, such as age and stream type, to infer a patient's voiding characteristics. Open dialog with patients regarding voiding preferences may garner important information regarding overall urologic health and better inform urologic care.

摘要

目的

男性的排尿姿势和偏好尚未得到充分描述。本研究旨在了解排尿特征的相互作用及其对排尿姿势的影响。

方法

我们设计了一份包含 27 个项目的调查,以评估在泌尿科和其他门诊诊所就诊的男性的排尿特征和下尿路症状(LUTS)严重程度。参与者包括我院门诊诊所的成年男性患者及其成年男性陪同者。收集的数据包括人口统计学信息、国际前列腺症状评分问卷、尿流类型(单一、分叉和滴沥)、排尿行为、排尿姿势质量和排尿困扰。

结果

我们收到了 195 份完整的调查问卷(80%的回复率)。在被调查的男性中,18%(35/195)喜欢坐着排尿。总体而言,选择坐姿排尿的男性中 LUTS 的比例更高(66%[23/35]vs.41%[66/160];p=0.01),影响排尿选择的身体限制因素更多(20%[7/35]vs.3%[5/160];p=0.001),并且站立排尿的意愿更低(6%[2/35]vs.24%[38/160];p=0.02)。与站立排尿的男性相比,坐着排尿的男性报告与排尿相关的困扰程度几乎是后者的两倍(34%[12/35])。与年轻男性相比,年龄较大的男性选择坐姿排尿的比例相似。选择坐姿排尿的最常见原因包括舒适和避免喷溅。

结论

我们的研究结果不支持根据可推广的特征(如年龄和尿流类型)来推测患者的排尿特征的经验主义信念。与患者就排尿偏好进行开诚布公的对话,可以获得有关整体泌尿科健康的重要信息,并为泌尿科护理提供更好的依据。

相似文献

1
Characterizing voiding experiences of men choosing seated and standing positions.描述选择坐姿和站姿排尿的男性的排尿体验。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Nov;39(8):2509-2519. doi: 10.1002/nau.24523. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Use of Structural Equation Modeling to Demonstrate the Differential Impact of Storage and Voiding Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms on Symptom Bother and Quality of Life during Treatment for Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.使用结构方程模型证明储存和排空下尿路症状对良性前列腺增生相关下尿路症状治疗期间症状困扰和生活质量的不同影响。
J Urol. 2016 Sep;196(3):824-30. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.062. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Prevalence, severity, and symptom bother of lower urinary tract symptoms among men in the EPIC study: impact of overactive bladder.EPIC 研究中男性下尿路症状的患病率、严重程度和症状困扰:膀胱过度活动症的影响。
Eur Urol. 2009 Jul;56(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.02.026. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
4
Effect of voiding position on uroflowmetric parameters and post-void residual urine volume in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.排尿姿势对良性前列腺增生患者尿流率参数及残余尿量的影响。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2004;38(3):240-2. doi: 10.1080/00365590410028674.
5
Which voiding position is associated with lowest flow rates in healthy adult men? role of natural voiding position.哪种排尿姿势与健康成年男性的最低流量相关?自然排尿姿势的作用。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2010 Mar;29(3):413-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.20759.
6
Improvement of voiding characteristics in morbidly obese women after bariatric surgery: A single-center study with a 1-year follow-up.减重手术后病态肥胖女性排尿特征的改善:一项为期1年随访的单中心研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017 May;13(5):836-841. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.01.047. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Metabolic syndrome associated with reduced lower urinary tract symptoms in middle-aged men receiving health checkup.代谢综合征与接受健康检查的中年男性下尿路症状减少有关。
Urology. 2012 Nov;80(5):1093-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.08.002.
8
Voiding time as a predictor for urinary tract function and health status.排尿时间作为尿路功能和健康状况的预测指标。
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2020 Jul;20(7):670-673. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13933. Epub 2020 May 13.
9
Prevalence and bother of postmicturition dribble in Finnish men aged 30-80 years: Tampere Ageing Male Urologic Study (TAMUS).芬兰30至80岁男性排尿后滴沥的患病率及困扰:坦佩雷老年男性泌尿系统研究(TAMUS)
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012 Dec;46(6):418-23. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.702786. Epub 2012 Jul 27.
10
Clinical implications of a feeling of incomplete emptying with little post-void residue in men with lower urinary tract symptoms.下尿路症状男性排空不全感伴少量残余尿量的临床意义
Neurourol Urodyn. 2014 Sep;33(7):1123-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.22473. Epub 2013 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Is seated voiding associated with lower urinary tract symptoms, health conditions, or marital status? Findings by age group from the 2023 Japan Community Health Survey.坐位排尿与下尿路症状、健康状况或婚姻状况有关吗?2023年日本社区健康调查各年龄组的调查结果。
Int J Urol. 2025 Feb;32(2):204-211. doi: 10.1111/iju.15624. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
The Use of Uroflowmetry as a Diagnostic Test.尿流率测定作为一种诊断测试的应用。
Curr Urol Rep. 2024 May;25(5):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s11934-024-01200-0. Epub 2024 Feb 28.