• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构性交叉性的运用:分析家庭暴力民事保护令程序如何复制不平等现象的方法

The Use of Structural Intersectionality as a Method to Analyze How the Domestic Violence Civil Protective Order Process Replicates Inequality.

机构信息

Arizona State University, Tempe, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2021 Apr;27(5):639-665. doi: 10.1177/1077801220958495. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1177/1077801220958495
PMID:32965175
Abstract

While protective orders remain a commonly used resource, multiply marginalized survivors are often unable to file for, obtain, serve, and enforce orders. I argue that using structural intersectionality as a method is the best way to reveal how the protective order process replicates broader social inequalities. I advocate for an alternative way of using structural intersectionality. I first identify the mechanisms by which inequalities exist and then describe how these can be traced back to intersecting social identities. In doing so, I highlight the importance of historical context and the blurring of the civil and criminal legal systems.

摘要

虽然保护令仍然是一种常用的资源,但多重边缘化的幸存者往往无法申请、获得、送达和执行保护令。我认为,使用结构交叉性作为一种方法是揭示保护令程序如何复制更广泛的社会不平等的最佳方式。我主张以一种替代的方式使用结构交叉性。我首先确定不平等存在的机制,然后描述这些机制如何可以追溯到交叉的社会身份。通过这样做,我强调了历史背景和民事与刑事法律制度之间界限模糊的重要性。

相似文献

1
The Use of Structural Intersectionality as a Method to Analyze How the Domestic Violence Civil Protective Order Process Replicates Inequality.结构性交叉性的运用:分析家庭暴力民事保护令程序如何复制不平等现象的方法
Violence Against Women. 2021 Apr;27(5):639-665. doi: 10.1177/1077801220958495. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Domestic Violence and Social Justice: A Structural Intersectional Framework for Teaching About Domestic Violence.家庭暴力与社会正义:一个用于教授家庭暴力相关知识的结构性交叉性框架
Violence Against Women. 2016 Oct;22(12):1426-37. doi: 10.1177/1077801215625851. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
Intersectionality: a means for centering power and oppression in research.交叉性:将权力和压迫置于研究中心的一种手段。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Aug;27(3):863-875. doi: 10.1007/s10459-022-10110-0. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
4
The Intersectionality Toolbox: A Resource for Teaching and Applying an Intersectional Lens in Public Health.《交叉性工具箱:公共卫生教学与应用交叉视角的资源》
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;9:772301. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.772301. eCollection 2021.
5
¿Somos iguales? Using a structural violence framework to understand gender and health inequities from an intersectional perspective in the Peruvian Amazon.我们是平等的吗?运用结构性暴力框架从秘鲁亚马逊地区的交叉视角理解性别与健康不平等问题。
Glob Health Action. 2017 Jan-Dec;10(sup2):1330458. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1330458.
6
'Guilty as charged': Intersectionality and accountability in lay talk on discrimination and violence.“罪名成立”:关于歧视与暴力的日常谈话中的交叉性与问责制
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1215-1229. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12627. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
7
Teaching Domestic Violence in the New Millennium: Intersectionality as a Framework for Social Change.新千年的家庭暴力教学:以交叉性为社会变革框架
Violence Against Women. 2016 Oct;22(12):1463-75. doi: 10.1177/1077801215626808. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
8
Marginalized identities, discrimination burden, and mental health: empirical exploration of an interpersonal-level approach to modeling intersectionality.边缘化身份、歧视负担与心理健康:对交叉性建模的人际层面方法的实证探索。
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2437-45. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.09.023. Epub 2012 Sep 26.
9
Why the Gap in Evaluating the Social Constructs and the Value of Medicines?为什么在评估药品的社会构建和价值方面存在差距?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Dec;39(12):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01075-w. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Mechanisms underlying the relationship between the intersectionality of multiple social identities with depression among US adults: A population-based study on the mediating roles of lifestyle behaviors.多种社会身份交叉与美国成年人抑郁之间关系的潜在机制:基于人群的研究,探讨生活方式行为的中介作用。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Mar 15;349:384-393. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.078. Epub 2024 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Community and System Advocate Perspectives on Extreme Risk Protection Order Implementation: Qualitative Lessons on Client Context, Professionalization, and Equity.社区和系统倡导者对极端风险保护令实施的看法:关于客户背景、专业化和公平性的定性经验教训
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251370929. doi: 10.1177/00469580251370929. Epub 2025 Aug 31.
2
Incredible Women: Legal Systems Abuse, Coercive Control, and the Credibility of Victim-Survivors.非凡女性:法律制度滥用、强制控制与受害者幸存者的可信度
Violence Against Women. 2025 Mar;31(3-4):767-788. doi: 10.1177/10778012231220370. Epub 2023 Dec 17.