• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情时期的伦理困境:如何决定谁生谁死?

Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?

作者信息

Neves Nedy M B C, Bitencourt Flávia B C S N, Bitencourt Almir G V

机构信息

. Universidade Salvador (Unifacs), Salvador, BA, Brasil.

. Fleury Medicina e Saúde, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

出版信息

Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 Sep 21;66Suppl 2(Suppl 2):106-111. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.S2.106. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1590/1806-9282.66.S2.106
PMID:32965367
Abstract

The respiratory disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a pandemic that produces a large number of simultaneous patients with severe symptoms and in need of special hospital care, overloading the infrastructure of health services. All of these demands generate the need to ration equipment and interventions. Faced with this imbalance, how, when, and who decides, there is the impact of the stressful systems of professionals who are at the front line of care and, in the background, issues inherent to human subjectivity. Along this path, the idea of using artificial intelligence algorithms to replace health professionals in the decision-making process also arises. In this context, there is the ethical question of how to manage the demands produced by the pandemic. The objective of this work is to reflect, from the point of view of medical ethics, on the basic principles of the choices made by the health teams, during the COVID-19 pandemic, whose resources are scarce and decisions cause anguish and restlessness. The ethical values for the rationing of health resources in an epidemic must converge to some proposals based on fundamental values such as maximizing the benefits produced by scarce resources, treating people equally, promoting and recommending instrumental values, giving priority to critical situations. Naturally, different judgments will occur in different circumstances, but transparency is essential to ensure public trust. In this way, it is possible to develop prioritization guidelines using well-defined values and ethical recommendations to achieve fair resource allocation.

摘要

由冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2引起的呼吸系统疾病(COVID-19)是一场大流行病,它导致大量患者同时出现严重症状,需要特殊的医院护理,使卫生服务基础设施不堪重负。所有这些需求使得有必要对设备和干预措施进行配给。面对这种失衡,如何、何时以及由谁来做出决定,这涉及到处于护理一线的专业人员所面临的压力系统的影响,以及背后人类主观性所固有的问题。沿着这条道路,还出现了使用人工智能算法在决策过程中取代卫生专业人员的想法。在这种背景下,存在着如何应对大流行病所产生需求的伦理问题。这项工作的目的是从医学伦理的角度,反思在COVID-19大流行期间,卫生团队做出选择的基本原则,当时资源稀缺,决策引发痛苦和不安。在流行病中对卫生资源进行配给的伦理价值观必须汇聚到一些基于基本价值观的提议上,比如使稀缺资源产生的效益最大化、平等对待人们、促进和推荐工具性价值观、优先处理危急情况。当然,在不同情况下会有不同的判断,但透明度对于确保公众信任至关重要。通过这种方式,有可能利用明确界定的价值观和伦理建议制定优先排序指南,以实现公平的资源分配。

相似文献

1
Ethical dilemmas in COVID-19 times: how to decide who lives and who dies?新冠疫情时期的伦理困境:如何决定谁生谁死?
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2020 Sep 21;66Suppl 2(Suppl 2):106-111. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.S2.106. eCollection 2020.
2
Medical Ethics and Ventilator Allocation During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间的医学伦理与呼吸机分配
Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2020 Jul 16;22(4):20com02687. doi: 10.4088/PCC.20com02687.
3
Allocation of scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Jewish ethical perspective.COVID-19 大流行期间稀缺资源的分配:犹太伦理视角。
J Med Ethics. 2020 Jul;46(7):444-446. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106242. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
4
The ethical dimension of prioritization and allocation decisions within the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.2019年冠状病毒病大流行背景下优先排序和分配决策的伦理维度。
Pol Arch Intern Med. 2020 May 29;130(5):466-472. doi: 10.20452/pamw.15334. Epub 2020 May 1.
5
Ventilators, Guidelines, Judgment, and Trust.呼吸机、指南、判断和信任。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 May;50(3):5-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.1117.
6
A Framework for Rationing Ventilators and Critical Care Beds During the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间呼吸机及重症监护床位分配框架
JAMA. 2020 May 12;323(18):1773-1774. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.5046.
7
Principled decisions and virtuous care: an ethical assessment of the SIAARTI Guidelines for allocating intensive care resources.有原则的决策和高尚的关怀:对 SIAARTI 重症监护资源分配指南的伦理评估。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Aug;86(8):872-876. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14691-1. Epub 2020 May 28.
8
Making ordinary decisions in extraordinary times.于非常时期做平常抉择。
BMJ. 2020 Aug 26;370:m3268. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3268.
9
[Ethical guides, criteria for admission in intensive care, palliative care. Multi-society recommendations for allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic].[伦理指南、重症监护与姑息治疗的收治标准。多学会关于新冠疫情期间资源分配的建议]
Medicina (B Aires). 2020;80 Suppl 3:45-64.
10
The Resurgence of Medical Ethics During the Coronavirus Disease (COVID)-19 Outbreak.新冠疫情期间医学伦理的复兴。
AIDS Rev. 2020 Jul 8;22(2):123-124. doi: 10.24875/AIDSRev.M20000034.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the physicians' psychological health: A systematic scoping review.评估新冠疫情对医生心理健康的影响:一项系统综述。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 28;10:1071537. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1071537. eCollection 2023.
2
[Recovery-stress levels in paramedics during the first two waves of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic].[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)大流行前两波期间护理人员的恢复应激水平]
Notf Rett Med. 2022 Nov 29:1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10049-022-01102-z.
3
The Clinical Information Systems Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic.
临床信息系统应对 COVID-19 大流行的措施。
Yearb Med Inform. 2021 Aug;30(1):105-125. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726513. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
4
What Can COVID-19 Teach Us about Using AI in Pandemics?新冠疫情能在大流行中运用人工智能方面给我们带来哪些启示?
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Dec 1;8(4):527. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040527.