Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University, 950 New Hampshire Avenue NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2020 Dec;17(6):579-588. doi: 10.1007/s11904-020-00533-y. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a safe and effective preventive intervention that could play a central role in ending the HIV epidemic. However, low uptake in general, and among certain social groups in particular, underscores the need to identify and address barriers to PrEP use. PrEP stigma has emerged as a key factor interfering with PrEP interest, uptake, and continuation. The purpose of this article is to describe and contextualize PrEP stigma and to offer recommendations on how to address it in future PrEP implementation initiatives.
PrEP users are commonly stereotyped as sexually irresponsible, promiscuous, and immoral. These stereotypes and associated prejudice manifest at multiple levels and discourage PrEP interest and uptake, disrupt PrEP adherence, and motivate PrEP discontinuation. Intersecting forms of stigma may influence the nature, magnitude, and impact of PrEP stigma across social groups and otherwise hinder PrEP use. Current PrEP implementation strategies that narrowly focus on risk and target stigmatized groups with disproportionately high HIV incidence have yielded limited success and are counterproductive to the extent that they perpetuate stigma. Implementation strategies involving more inclusive messaging and further integration of PrEP within healthcare may help to reduce PrEP stigma and mitigate its impact, ultimately increasing PrEP use. PrEP stigma is a barrier to PrEP interest, uptake, and continuation that manifests at multiple levels. Understanding and addressing PrEP stigma requires consideration of its origins and intersections. Targeted, risk-focused implementation strategies perpetuate stigma and undermine use.
HIV 暴露前预防(PrEP)是一种安全有效的预防干预措施,可在终结 HIV 流行方面发挥核心作用。然而,总体上的低利用率,尤其是某些特定社会群体中的低利用率,突显了必须确定和解决 PrEP 使用障碍。PrEP 污名化已成为干扰 PrEP 兴趣、接受度和持续性的关键因素。本文的目的是描述和分析 PrEP 污名化,并就未来 PrEP 实施计划中如何解决这一问题提出建议。
PrEP 用户通常被刻板印象为性不负责任、滥交和不道德。这些刻板印象和相关偏见表现在多个层面,阻碍了 PrEP 的兴趣、接受度和持续性,破坏了 PrEP 的依从性,并促使 PrEP 停药。交叉形式的污名可能会影响社会群体中 PrEP 污名的性质、程度和影响,或者以其他方式阻碍 PrEP 的使用。目前的 PrEP 实施策略狭隘地关注风险,针对 HIV 发病率过高的污名化群体,收效甚微,反而加剧了污名化,因为这些策略助长了污名化。涉及更具包容性信息传递的实施策略,以及在医疗保健中进一步整合 PrEP,可能有助于减少 PrEP 污名化并减轻其影响,最终增加 PrEP 的使用。PrEP 污名化是 PrEP 兴趣、接受度和持续性的障碍,表现在多个层面。理解和解决 PrEP 污名化需要考虑其起源和交叉点。有针对性的、以风险为重点的实施策略会加剧污名化,破坏 PrEP 的使用。