Legal Medicine Unit, Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
S.C. Medicina Legale U, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
J Forensic Sci. 2021 Jan;66(1):407-412. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14565. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
The discovery of mummified bodies in domestic settings is not unusual in the medico-legal context. It is often a marker of social isolation, even in our urban modern society, and usually occurs among elderly people living alone or in precarious conditions. However, bereaved subjects can sometimes be found managing their grief by deliberately keeping the corpses of their loved ones at home. Investigation of these atypical cases can be challenging and often requires a multidisciplinary effort by different forensic specialists. We report two cases of people who lived for several months with the mummified remains of a relative. In both cases, the judge ordered a forensic psychiatry assessment of the survivors' competency and the reasons for this peculiar behavior, which is regarded as abnormal in our society. Case 1 describes a shared psychosis, which developed out of a condition of extreme seclusion of the entire family. Case 2 shows that even a mild personality disorder on which a series of traumatic events operates can trigger psychotic decompensation, causing extreme denial of the reality of death. The analysis of these cases contributes to our knowledge of the scantly studied phenomenon of "Living with the Dead" and raises questions about the psychopathology behind it. It is useful to identify subjects who are more prone to developing this "deviant" behavior, in order to distinguish people with mental illness from those who merely want to profit from the death of a loved one.
在法医学背景下,在家中发现木乃伊化的尸体并不罕见。即使在我们的现代城市社会中,这种情况也常常是社会孤立的标志,通常发生在独居或生活条件不稳定的老年人中。然而,有时也会发现丧亲者通过故意将亲人的尸体留在家中来处理自己的悲痛。对这些非典型案例的调查可能具有挑战性,通常需要不同法医专家的多学科努力。我们报告了两例与亲人木乃伊化遗骸共同生活数月的案例。在这两种情况下,法官都命令对幸存者的能力和这种特殊行为的原因进行法医精神病学评估,因为这种行为在我们的社会中被视为异常。案例 1 描述了一种共享的精神病,这种病是由于整个家庭的极端隔离而发展起来的。案例 2 表明,即使是一系列创伤事件作用下的轻度人格障碍也可能引发精神病性失代偿,导致对死亡现实的极度否认。对这些案例的分析有助于我们了解研究甚少的“与死者共同生活”现象,并提出了关于其背后精神病理学的问题。确定更容易出现这种“异常”行为的个体是有用的,以便将患有精神疾病的人与仅仅想从亲人死亡中获利的人区分开来。