California State University, Fullerton.
University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
J Athl Train. 2020 Oct 1;55(10):1089-1097. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0406.19.
Athletic trainers (ATs) recognize patient care documentation as an important part of clinical practice. However, ATs using 1 electronic medical record (EMR) platform reported low accountability and lack of time as barriers to documentation. Whether ATs using paper, other EMRs, or a combined paper-electronic system exhibit similar behaviors or experience similar challenges is unclear.
To explore ATs' documentation behaviors and perceived challenges while using various systems to document patient care in the secondary school setting.
Qualitative study.
Individual telephone interviews.
Twenty ATs (12 women, 8 men; age = 38 ± 14 years; clinical experience = 15 ± 13 years; from National Athletic Trainers' Association Districts 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10) were recruited via purposeful and snowball-sampling techniques.
Two investigators conducted semistructured interviews, which were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Following the consensual qualitative research tradition, 3 researchers independently coded transcripts in 4 rounds using a codebook to confirm codes, themes, and data saturation. Multiple researchers, member checking, and peer reviewing were the methods used to triangulate data and enhance trustworthiness.
The secondary school setting was central to 3 themes. The ATs identified challenges to documentation, including lack of time due to high patient volume and multiple providers or locations where care was provided. Oftentimes, these challenges affected their documentation behaviors, including the process of and criteria for whether to document or not, content documented, and location and timing of documentation. To enhance patient care documentation, ATs described the need for more professional development, including resources or specific guidelines and viewing how documentation has been used to improve clinical practice.
Challenges particular to the secondary school setting affected ATs' documentation behaviors, regardless of the system used to document care. Targeted professional development is needed to promote best practices in patient care documentation.
运动训练员(ATs)将患者护理文档视为临床实践的重要组成部分。然而,使用单一电子病历(EMR)平台的 ATs 报告称,对文档记录的问责制低和缺乏时间是障碍。目前尚不清楚使用纸质文档、其他 EMR 或纸质-电子混合系统的 ATs 是否表现出类似行为或面临类似挑战。
探索 ATs 在中学环境中使用各种系统记录患者护理时的文档记录行为和感知到的挑战。
定性研究。
个人电话访谈。
通过有目的和滚雪球抽样技术招募了 20 名 AT(12 名女性,8 名男性;年龄=38±14 岁;临床经验=15±13 年;来自美国运动训练协会的第 2、3、6、7、8、9 和 10 区)。
两位研究人员进行了半结构化访谈,访谈内容被录音并逐字转录。根据共识定性研究传统,3 位研究人员使用代码簿在 4 轮中独立对转录本进行编码,以确认代码、主题和数据饱和。使用多位研究人员、成员检查和同行评审的方法对数据进行三角验证并提高可信度。
中学环境是 3 个主题的核心。ATs 确定了文档记录的挑战,包括由于患者数量多以及提供护理的多个提供者或地点而导致的缺乏时间。这些挑战经常影响他们的文档记录行为,包括记录或不记录的过程和标准、记录的内容以及文档记录的位置和时间。为了增强患者护理文档记录,ATs 描述了需要更多的专业发展,包括资源或特定指南以及查看文档记录如何用于改善临床实践。
中学环境的特殊挑战影响了 ATs 的文档记录行为,无论使用何种系统记录护理。需要有针对性的专业发展,以促进患者护理文档记录的最佳实践。