• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

椎间盘内脉冲射频应用时间对腰椎间盘源性下腰痛的影响。

Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency Application Duration Effect on Lumbar Discogenic Low Back Pain.

机构信息

Daegu Wooridul Spine Hospital, Jung-Gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Wooridul Spine Hospital, Korea.

出版信息

Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):E535-E540.

PMID:32967404
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Discogenic pain is recognized as the most important and most common cause of low back pain (LBP). Intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency (ID-PRF) is used for the treatment of chronic discogenic pain.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the effects of the duration of percutaneous monopolar ID-PRF application on chronic discogenic LBP.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Neurosurgery at Wooridul Spine Hospital.

METHODS

Forty-five patients were included in this retrospective study. The patients were assigned into 2 groups according to the duration of the PRF procedure they underwent (7-minute group = 17 patients vs. 15-minute group = 28 patients). The main outcome measures tested were pain score, as determined by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-11) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), at baseline, at 2-week, and 6-month follow-up visits. Success was defined as a reduction in NRS-11 of 50% or more or an ODI reduction of 40% or more.

RESULTS

The mean posttreatment pain scores at 2 weeks and 6 months were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in both groups, but the differences between the groups were not significant. ODI scores were also significantly lower compared with the baseline, but the differences between the groups were not significant. At the 6-month follow-up, 12 patients (70.6%) in the 7-minute group and 20 patients (71.4%) in the 15-minute group reported more than 50% reduction in the pain score (P = 0.16), and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the number of patients with more than 40% reduction in ODI score (P = 0.23).

LIMITATIONS

This study was performed with a small sample size and there was no control group. Additional well-designed and well-controlled studies that include parameters such as the stimulation duration, mode, and intensity of PRF are needed to fully assess the efficiency of ID-PRF.

CONCLUSIONS

ID-PRF was shown to be effective for the treatment of discogenic LBP regardless of duration of ID-PRF application (7 vs. 15 minutes).

摘要

背景

椎间盘源性疼痛被认为是导致下腰痛(LBP)的最重要和最常见的原因。经皮单极椎间盘内脉冲射频(ID-PRF)用于治疗慢性椎间盘源性腰痛。

目的

我们研究了经皮单极 ID-PRF 应用时间长短对慢性椎间盘源性 LBP 的影响。

研究设计

回顾性研究。

设置

蔚山脊柱医院麻醉与疼痛医学系,神经外科。

方法

本回顾性研究纳入 45 例患者。根据 PRF 治疗时间长短将患者分为 2 组(7 分钟组=17 例与 15 分钟组=28 例)。主要观察指标为基线、2 周和 6 个月随访时的疼痛评分(NRS-11 评分和 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI))。疗效定义为 NRS-11 评分降低 50%或以上或 ODI 评分降低 40%或以上。

结果

两组治疗后 2 周和 6 个月时的平均疼痛评分均显著降低(P < 0.05),但组间差异无统计学意义。ODI 评分也较基线显著降低,但组间差异无统计学意义。6 个月随访时,7 分钟组 12 例(70.6%)和 15 分钟组 20 例(71.4%)患者疼痛评分降低 50%以上(P = 0.16),两组 ODI 评分降低 40%以上的患者比例无显著差异(P = 0.23)。

局限性

本研究样本量较小,且无对照组。需要更多设计良好且对照良好的研究,包括 PRF 的刺激持续时间、模式和强度等参数,以充分评估 ID-PRF 的疗效。

结论

无论 ID-PRF 应用时间长短(7 分钟与 15 分钟),ID-PRF 均可有效治疗椎间盘源性 LBP。

相似文献

1
Intradiscal Pulsed Radiofrequency Application Duration Effect on Lumbar Discogenic Low Back Pain.椎间盘内脉冲射频应用时间对腰椎间盘源性下腰痛的影响。
Pain Physician. 2020 Sep;23(5):E535-E540.
2
Intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency for chronic lumbar discogenic low back pain: a one year prospective outcome study using discoblock for diagnosis.椎间盘内脉冲射频治疗慢性腰椎间盘源性下腰痛:使用椎间盘内阻滞诊断的一年前瞻性结果研究。
Pain Physician. 2013 Jul-Aug;16(4):E435-42.
3
Use of Pulsed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Discogenic Back Pain: A Narrative Review.脉冲射频治疗椎间盘源性腰痛:系统评价。
Pain Pract. 2021 Jun;21(5):594-601. doi: 10.1111/papr.12978. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
4
Effect of intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency on refractory chronic discogenic neck pain: A case report.椎间盘内脉冲射频治疗难治性慢性盘源性颈痛的疗效:1例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(16):e0509. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010509.
5
Results of pulsed radiofrequency technique with two laterally placed electrodes in the annulus in patients with chronic lumbar discogenic pain.脉冲射频技术在双侧环锯处电极治疗慢性腰椎间盘源性疼痛的临床疗效。
J Anesth. 2012 Aug;26(4):606-9. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1385-7. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
6
Therapeutic effect of intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency on internal disc disruption: A case report.经皮椎间盘内脉冲射频治疗椎间盘内破裂:病例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Feb 11;101(6):e28831. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028831.
7
Results of intradiscal pulsed radiofrequency for lumbar discogenic pain: comparison with intradiscal electrothermal therapy.经皮椎间盘内脉冲射频治疗腰椎间盘源性疼痛的疗效:与经皮椎间盘电热疗法的比较。
Korean J Pain. 2012 Jul;25(3):155-60. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2012.25.3.155. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
8
Percutaneous Intradiscal Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Combined with Sinuvertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Discogenic Low Back Pain.经皮椎间盘内射频热凝联合脊神经后支消融术治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛。
Pain Physician. 2024 Sep;27(7):E705-E714.
9
Effect of intradiscal monopolar pulsed radiofrequency on chronic discogenic back pain diagnosed by pressure-controlled provocative discography: a one year prospective study.椎间盘内单极脉冲射频对经压力控制激发性椎间盘造影诊断的慢性盘源性下腰痛的影响:一项为期一年的前瞻性研究。
Ann Rehabil Med. 2012 Oct;36(5):648-56. doi: 10.5535/arm.2012.36.5.648. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
10
One-year follow-up results of intradiscal diode laser, radiofrequency, and pulsed radiofrequency therapies: a retrospective study.椎间盘内二极管激光、射频和脉冲射频治疗的一年随访结果:一项回顾性研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):137-142. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2095-4. Epub 2016 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities.影像引导下退行性腰椎疾病的微创治疗选择:当前可能性的实用概述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 May 30;14(11):1147. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14111147.
2
The percutaneous spinal endoscopy "isolation zone" technique for discogenic low back pain: a case series study.经皮脊柱内窥镜下“隔离带”技术治疗椎间盘源性下腰痛:一项病例系列研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2022 Oct 14;27(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s40001-022-00837-2.
3
Effect of radiofrequency denervation on pain severity among patients with cervical, thoracic or lumbar spinal pain: A clinical retrospective study.
射频去神经术对颈、胸或腰椎疼痛患者疼痛严重程度的影响:一项临床回顾性研究。
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 26;8(9):e10755. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10755. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Efficacy and safety of high-voltage versus standard-voltage pulsed radiofrequency ablation for patients with neuropathic pain: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.高压与标准电压脉冲射频消融治疗神经性疼痛患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 8;12(7):e063385. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063385.