Poeta Silva Ana Paula S, Magtoto Ronaldo L, Souza Almeida Henrique M, McDaniel Aric, Magtoto Precy D, Derscheid Rachel J, Merodio Maria M, Matias Ferreyra Franco S, Gatto Igor R H, Baum David H, Clavijo Maria J, Arruda Bailey L, Zimmerman Jeffrey J, Giménez-Lirola Luis G
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Universidade Estadual de São Paulo, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Nov 18;58(12). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00485-20.
is an economically significant pathogen of swine. serum antibody detection via commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) is widely used for routine surveillance in commercial swine production systems. Samples from two studies were used to evaluate assay performance. In study 1, 6 commercial ELISAs were compared using serum samples from 8-week-old cesarean-derived, colostrum-deprived (CDCD) pigs allocated to the following 5 inoculation groups of 10 pigs each: (i) negative control, (ii) (strain 27399), (iii) (strain 38983), (iv) (strain 34428), and (v) (strain 232). Weekly serum and daily oral fluid samples were collected through 56 days postinoculation (dpi). The true status of pigs was established by PCR testing on oral fluids samples over the course of the observation period. Analysis of ELISA performance at various cutoffs found that the manufacturers' recommended cutoffs were diagnostically specific, i.e., produced no false positives, with the exceptions of 2 ELISAs. An analysis based on overall misclassification error rates found that 4 ELISAs performed similarly, although one assay produced more false positives. In study 2, the 3 best-performing ELISAs from study 1 were compared using serum samples generated under field conditions. Ten 8-week-old pigs were intratracheally inoculated with Matched serum and tracheal samples (to establish the true pig status) were collected at 7- to 14-day intervals through 98 dpi. Analyses of sensitivity and specificity showed similar performance among these 3 ELISAs. Overall, this study provides an assessment of the performance of current ELISAs and an understanding of their use in surveillance.
是猪的一种具有经济重要性的病原体。通过商业酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行血清抗体检测广泛用于商业养猪生产系统的常规监测。来自两项研究的样本用于评估检测性能。在研究1中,使用来自8周龄剖腹产、初乳剥夺(CDCD)猪的血清样本比较了6种商业ELISA,这些猪被分配到以下5个接种组,每组10头猪:(i)阴性对照,(ii)(菌株27399),(iii)(菌株38983),(iv)(菌株34428),以及(v)(菌株232)。在接种后56天(dpi)内每周收集血清样本,每天收集口腔液体样本。通过在观察期内对口腔液体样本进行PCR检测来确定猪的真实状态。在各种临界值下对ELISA性能的分析发现,除了2种ELISA外,制造商推荐的临界值在诊断上具有特异性,即没有产生假阳性。基于总体错误分类错误率的分析发现,4种ELISA表现相似,尽管有一种检测产生了更多的假阳性。在研究2中,使用在田间条件下产生的血清样本比较了研究1中表现最佳的3种ELISA。10头8周龄的猪经气管内接种 。在98 dpi之前,每隔7至14天收集匹配的血清和气管样本(以确定猪的真实状态)。敏感性和特异性分析表明这3种ELISA的性能相似。总体而言,本研究评估了当前ELISA的性能,并了解了它们在监测中的应用。