Suppr超能文献

比较评估一种商用荧光微球免疫分析和三种商用 ELISA 检测猪肺炎支原体血清抗体的性能。

Comparative assessment of the performance of a commercial fluorescent microsphere immunoassay and three commercial ELISAs for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae serum antibody detection.

机构信息

Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Virus and Prion Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Ames, IA, United States.

出版信息

Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2024 Oct;276:110826. doi: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2024.110826. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

Abstract

Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae (M. hyopneumoniae) is a significant porcine respiratory disease complex pathogen, prompting many swine farms and production systems to pursue M. hyopneumoniae elimination strategies. Antibody testing is cost-effective in demonstrating sustained freedom from M. hyopneumoniae, often replacing PCR testing on deep tracheal swabs. The process typically involves testing a subpopulation of the herd using an M. hyopneumoniae screening antibody ELISA, with non-negative results further assessed through confirmatory testing, such as PCR. Recently, a commercial (Biovet) fluorescent microsphere immunoassay (FMIA) for detecting M. hyopneumoniae antibodies has been introduced as an alternative to ELISA. Its performance was compared to three commercial ELISAs (Idexx, Hipra, and Biochek) using experimental serum samples from pigs inoculated with M. hyopneumoniae, M. hyorhinis, M. hyosynoviae, M. flocculare, or mock-inoculated with Friis medium. FMIA consistently detected M. hyopneumoniae at earlier time points than the ELISAs, although two false-positive results were encountered using the manufacturer's recommended cutoff. ROC analysis allowed for the evaluation of various cutoffs depending on testing objectives. Poisson regression of misclassification error counts detected no difference in the Biovet FMIA and Hipra ELISA but significantly fewer misclassification errors than Idexx and Biocheck ELISAs. This study showed FMIA as a suitable alternative to traditional ELISAs for screening purposes due to its superior antibody detection rate at early stages. Alternatively, adopting a more stringent cutoff to improve diagnostic specificity could position the FMIA as a viable confirmatory test option. Overall, FMIA is an optimal choice for M. hyopneumoniae antibody surveillance testing, offering versatility in testing strategies (e.g., triplex FMIA M. hyopneumoniae/PRRSV types 1 and 2) and contributing to improved diagnostic capabilities in porcine health management.

摘要

猪肺炎支原体(M. hyopneumoniae)是一种重要的猪呼吸道疾病复合病原体,促使许多猪场和生产系统采用 M. hyopneumoniae 消除策略。抗体检测在证明持续免受 M. hyopneumoniae 感染方面具有成本效益,通常替代深层气管拭子的 PCR 检测。该过程通常涉及使用 M. hyopneumoniae 筛选抗体 ELISA 对畜群的亚群进行检测,非阴性结果通过确认检测(如 PCR)进一步评估。最近,一种商业(Biovet)荧光微球免疫分析(FMIA)已被引入,用于检测 M. hyopneumoniae 抗体,作为 ELISA 的替代品。使用接种 M. hyopneumoniae、M. hyorhinis、M. hyosynoviae、M. flocculare 或用 Friis 培养基模拟接种的猪的实验血清样本,将其性能与三种商业 ELISA(Idexx、Hipra 和 Biochek)进行了比较。FMIA 始终比 ELISA 更早地检测到 M. hyopneumoniae,尽管使用制造商推荐的截止值时出现了两个假阳性结果。ROC 分析允许根据测试目标评估各种截止值。泊松回归误分类错误计数检测到 Biovet FMIA 和 Hipra ELISA 之间没有差异,但与 Idexx 和 Biochek ELISA 相比,误分类错误明显减少。这项研究表明,FMIA 作为传统 ELISA 的替代品,具有在早期阶段检测抗体的优势,适用于筛选目的。或者,采用更严格的截止值以提高诊断特异性,可以将 FMIA 作为可行的确认测试选项。总体而言,FMIA 是 M. hyopneumoniae 抗体监测测试的最佳选择,在测试策略(例如三重 FMIA M. hyopneumoniae/PRRSV 1 型和 2 型)方面具有多功能性,并有助于提高猪健康管理的诊断能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验