• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于传达背部和肾结石疼痛阿片类药物处方个体风险的故事:生命STORRIED多中心随机临床试验方案

Stories to Communicate Individual Risk for Opioid Prescriptions for Back and Kidney Stone Pain: Protocol for the Life STORRIED Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Meisel Zachary F, Goldberg Erica B, Dolan Abby R, Bansal Esha, Rhodes Karin V, Hess Erik P, Cannuscio Carolyn C, Schapira Marilyn M, Perrone Jeanmarie, Rodgers Melissa A, Zyla Michael M, Bell Jeffrey J, McCollum Sharon, Shofer Frances S

机构信息

Center for Emergency Care Policy and Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Department of Population Health Management, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):e19496. doi: 10.2196/19496.

DOI:10.2196/19496
PMID:32969832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7545334/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid misuse in the United States is a devastating public health crisis; many chronic opioid users were originally prescribed this class of medication for acute pain. Video narrative-enhanced risk communication may improve patient outcomes, such as knowledge of opioid risk and opioid use behaviors after an episode of acute pain.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective is to assess the effect of probabilistic and narrative-enhanced opioid risk communication on patient-reported outcomes, including knowledge, opioid use, and patient preferences, for patients who present to emergency departments with back pain and kidney stone pain.

METHODS

This is a multisite randomized controlled trial. Patients presenting to the acute care facilities of four geographically and ethnically diverse US hospital centers with acute renal colic pain or musculoskeletal back and/or neck pain are eligible for this randomized controlled trial. A control group of patients receiving general risk information is compared to two intervention groups: one receiving the risk information sheet plus an individualized, visual probabilistic Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) and another receiving the risk information sheet plus a video narrative-enhanced probabilistic ORT. We will study the effect of probabilistic and narrative-enhanced opioid risk communication on the following: risk awareness and recall at 14 days postenrollment, reduced use or preferences for opioids after the emergency department episode, and alignment with patient preference and provider prescription. To assess these outcomes, we administer baseline patient surveys during acute care admission and follow-up surveys at predetermined times during the 3 months after discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 1302 patients were enrolled over 24 months. The mean age of the participants was 40 years (SD 14), 692 out of 1302 (53.15%) were female, 556 out of 1302 (42.70%) were White, 498 out of 1302 (38.25%) were Black, 1002 out of 1302 (76.96%) had back pain, and 334 out of 1302 (25.65%) were at medium or high risk. Demographics and ORT scores were equally distributed across arms.

CONCLUSIONS

This study seeks to assess the potential clinical role of narrative-enhanced, risk-informed communication for acute pain management in acute care settings. This paper outlines the protocol used to implement the study and highlights crucial methodological, statistical, and stakeholder involvement as well as dissemination considerations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03134092; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03134092.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/19496.

摘要

背景

美国处方阿片类药物滥用是一场毁灭性的公共卫生危机;许多慢性阿片类药物使用者最初是因急性疼痛而被开具此类药物。视频叙事增强的风险沟通可能会改善患者的治疗效果,比如对阿片类药物风险的认知以及急性疼痛发作后的阿片类药物使用行为。

目的

我们的目的是评估概率性和叙事增强的阿片类药物风险沟通对因背痛和肾结石疼痛前往急诊科就诊患者报告的结局的影响,这些结局包括知识、阿片类药物使用情况以及患者偏好。

方法

这是一项多中心随机对照试验。在美国四个地理位置和种族多样的医院中心的急性护理机构就诊且患有急性肾绞痛疼痛或肌肉骨骼性背痛和/或颈痛的患者有资格参加此随机对照试验。将接受一般风险信息的对照组患者与两个干预组进行比较:一组接受风险信息表加个性化的视觉概率性阿片类药物风险工具(ORT),另一组接受风险信息表加视频叙事增强的概率性ORT。我们将研究概率性和叙事增强的阿片类药物风险沟通对以下方面的影响:入组后14天的风险意识和回忆、急诊科就诊后阿片类药物使用减少或偏好、以及与患者偏好和医生处方的一致性。为评估这些结局,我们在急性护理入院期间进行基线患者调查,并在出院后3个月内的预定时间进行随访调查。

结果

在24个月内共招募了1302名患者。参与者的平均年龄为40岁(标准差14),1302名中有692名(53.15%)为女性,1302名中有556名(42.70%)为白人,1302名中有498名(38.25%)为黑人,1302名中有1002名(76.96%)有背痛,1302名中有334名(25.65%)处于中度或高风险。人口统计学和ORT评分在各分组中均匀分布。

结论

本研究旨在评估叙事增强的、基于风险的沟通在急性护理环境中急性疼痛管理中的潜在临床作用。本文概述了用于实施该研究的方案,并强调了关键的方法学、统计学以及利益相关者的参与情况以及传播方面的考虑因素。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03134092;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03134092。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/19496。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/3db9b645dcd9/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/5a3b0377e756/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/94b333253b68/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/1a1cb3c100ae/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/49954980c4cf/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/6f920d84b2b9/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/75f01e5ab6bb/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/3db9b645dcd9/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/5a3b0377e756/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/94b333253b68/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/1a1cb3c100ae/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/49954980c4cf/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/6f920d84b2b9/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/75f01e5ab6bb/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70e1/7545334/3db9b645dcd9/resprot_v9i9e19496_fig7.jpg

相似文献

1
Stories to Communicate Individual Risk for Opioid Prescriptions for Back and Kidney Stone Pain: Protocol for the Life STORRIED Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.用于传达背部和肾结石疼痛阿片类药物处方个体风险的故事:生命STORRIED多中心随机临床试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 24;9(9):e19496. doi: 10.2196/19496.
2
3
Patient Preference and Risk Assessment in Opioid Prescribing Disparities: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.患者偏好和风险评估在阿片类药物处方差异中的作用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2118801. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18801.
4
A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pain Treatment Communication Tools in Emergency Department Patients With Back or Kidney Stone Pain.一项比较疼痛治疗沟通工具在急诊科腰痛或肾结石痛患者中有效性的多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(S1):S45-S55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306511.
5
Patient Perceptions About Opioid Risk Communications Within the Context of a Randomized Clinical Trial.患者对随机临床试验中阿片类药物风险沟通的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2227650. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27650.
6
A Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Primary Care Provider Adherence to Chronic Opioid Therapy Guidelines and Reduce Opioid Misuse: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.一项多组分干预措施,旨在提高初级保健提供者对慢性阿片类药物治疗指南的依从性并减少阿片类药物滥用:一项整群随机对照试验方案。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jan;60:101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2015.06.018. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
7
De-Implementing Opioid Use and Implementing Optimal Pain Management Following Dental Extractions (DIODE): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Trial.拔牙后停用阿片类药物并实施最佳疼痛管理(DIODE):一项整群随机试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 12;10(4):e24342. doi: 10.2196/24342.
8
Personalized risk communication and opioid prescribing in association with nonprescribed opioid use: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.个体化风险沟通与阿片类药物处方与非处方阿片类药物使用的关联:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Aug;30(8):851-858. doi: 10.1111/acem.14710. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
9
Electronic Health Record-Embedded Individualized Pain Plans for Emergency Department Treatment of Vaso-occlusive Episodes in Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: Protocol for a Preimplementation and Postimplementation Study.电子健康记录嵌入的成人镰状细胞病血管闭塞性发作急诊科治疗个性化疼痛计划:实施前和实施后研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Apr 16;10(4):e24818. doi: 10.2196/24818.
10
The association between specific narrative elements and patient perspectives on acute pain treatment.特定叙事元素与患者对急性疼痛治疗看法之间的关联。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.016. Epub 2023 Sep 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Disparities in Unmet Pain Treatment Preference, Pain Treatment Satisfaction and Subsequent Opioid Misuse: A Secondary Analysis of a National Multisite RCT.未满足的疼痛治疗偏好、疼痛治疗满意度及后续阿片类药物滥用方面的种族差异:一项全国多中心随机对照试验的二次分析
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09637-w.
2
The association between specific narrative elements and patient perspectives on acute pain treatment.特定叙事元素与患者对急性疼痛治疗看法之间的关联。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;74:84-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.09.016. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
3
Patient Perceptions About Opioid Risk Communications Within the Context of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
The Economic Burden of Prescription Opioid Overdose, Abuse, and Dependence in the United States, 2013.2013年美国处方阿片类药物过量、滥用及成瘾的经济负担
Med Care. 2016 Oct;54(10):901-6. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000625.
2
Conversations about analgesics in the emergency department: A qualitative study.急诊科关于镇痛药的对话:一项定性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Jul;99(7):1130-1137. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
3
Communication about opioid versus nonopioid analgesics in the emergency department.
患者对随机临床试验中阿片类药物风险沟通的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2227650. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27650.
4
Meisel et al. Reply.迈泽尔等人。回复。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Jul;112(7):e4. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306868.
5
A Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effectiveness of Pain Treatment Communication Tools in Emergency Department Patients With Back or Kidney Stone Pain.一项比较疼痛治疗沟通工具在急诊科腰痛或肾结石痛患者中有效性的多中心随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Feb;112(S1):S45-S55. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306511.
6
Patient Preference and Risk Assessment in Opioid Prescribing Disparities: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.患者偏好和风险评估在阿片类药物处方差异中的作用:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2118801. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18801.
急诊科关于阿片类与非阿片类镇痛药的沟通。
J Opioid Manag. 2015 May-Jun;11(3):229-36. doi: 10.5055/jom.2015.0271.
4
Patient Perspectives of Acute Pain Management in the Era of the Opioid Epidemic.阿片类药物流行时代急性疼痛管理的患者视角
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;66(3):246-252.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
5
Improving patient knowledge and safe use of opioids: a randomized controlled trial.提高患者对阿片类药物的认知及安全使用:一项随机对照试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;22(3):331-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12600. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
6
How, why, and for whom do emergency medicine providers use prescription drug monitoring programs?急诊医学从业者如何、为何以及为谁使用处方药监测程序?
Pain Med. 2015 Jun;16(6):1122-31. doi: 10.1111/pme.12700. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
7
How do physicians adopt and apply opioid prescription guidelines in the emergency department? A qualitative study.医生如何在急诊科采用和应用阿片类药物处方指南?一项定性研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;64(5):482-489.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.03.015. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective? A critical review of theory and evidence.个人故事是否使患者决策辅助工具更有效?理论与证据的批判性回顾。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S9. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
9
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers.呈现决策结果的定量信息:为患者决策辅助工具开发者提供风险沟通基础
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S7. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
10
All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids.所有的故事都不相同:基于目的、内容和价值的决策辅助患者叙述分类法。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Jan;33(1):4-13. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12463266. Epub 2012 Oct 11.