• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哪些因素影响继续医学教育模式和提供者的选择?一项对美国医生、护士从业者和医师助理的全国性调查。

What Influences Choice of Continuing Medical Education Modalities and Providers? A National Survey of U.S. Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician Assistants.

机构信息

M. O'Brien Pott is senior analyst, Planning Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

A.S. Blanshan is senior marketing manager, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

Acad Med. 2021 Jan 1;96(1):93-100. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003758.

DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003758
PMID:32969838
Abstract

PURPOSE

To explore what influences clinicians in selecting continuing medical education (CME) activities in the United States.

METHOD

In August 2018, the authors conducted an Internet-based national survey, sampling 100 respondents from each of 5 groups: family medicine physicians, internal medicine and hospitalist physicians, medicine specialist physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. In total, 1,895 clinicians were invited and 500 (26%) responded. Questions addressed the selection and anticipated use of CME delivery modalities and perceived characteristics of specific CME providers. Response formats used best-worst scaling or 5-point ordinal response options.

RESULTS

The factors identified as most important in selecting CME activities were topic (best-worst scaling net positivity 0.54), quality of content (0.51), availability of CME credit (0.43), and clinical practice focus (0.41), while referral frequency (-0.57) ranked lowest. The activities that the respondents anticipated using most in the future were live (mean 3.8 [1 = not likely, 5 = very likely]), online (mean 3.5), point-of-care (mean 3.5), and print-based (mean 3.5) activities. For online CME, the features of greatest appeal were that learning could be done when clinicians had time (mean 4.4), at their own pace (mean 4.2), and at lower cost (mean 4.2). For live CME, the features of greatest appeal were that the subject was best taught using this modality (mean 4.0), or the activity was located in a destination spot (mean 4.0) or a regional location (mean 3.9). When rating specific CME providers, most academic institutions received relatively high ratings for research focus and clinical practice focus, whereas commercial providers had slightly higher ratings for ease of access. Responses were generally similar across clinician types and age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants are interested in using a variety of CME delivery modalities. Appealing features of online and live CME were different.

摘要

目的

探索美国临床医生选择继续医学教育(CME)活动的影响因素。

方法

2018 年 8 月,作者进行了一项基于互联网的全国性调查,从 5 个群体中各抽取 100 名受访者:家庭医学医师、内科和医院医师、医学专家医师、执业护士和医师助理。共有 1895 名临床医生受邀,其中 500 名(26%)做出了回应。问题涉及选择和预期使用 CME 交付模式以及对特定 CME 提供者的感知特征。使用最佳最差分级或 5 点有序响应选项回答问题。

结果

被确定为选择 CME 活动最重要的因素是主题(最佳最差分级净正性 0.54)、内容质量(0.51)、CME 学分的可用性(0.43)和临床实践重点(0.41),而推荐频率(-0.57)排名最低。受访者预计未来最常使用的活动是现场(平均 3.8[1=不太可能,5=非常可能])、在线(平均 3.5)、即时护理(平均 3.5)和基于印刷的(平均 3.5)活动。对于在线 CME,最吸引人的特点是当临床医生有时间时(平均 4.4)、按照自己的节奏(平均 4.2)和以较低的成本(平均 4.2)学习。对于现场 CME,最吸引人的特点是该主题最好通过这种模式教授(平均 4.0),或者活动位于目的地(平均 4.0)或地区位置(平均 3.9)。在对特定 CME 提供者进行评分时,大多数学术机构因其研究重点和临床实践重点获得了相对较高的评分,而商业提供者因其易于访问而获得了略高的评分。各临床医生类型和年龄组的回复基本相似。

结论

医生、执业护士和医师助理有兴趣使用各种 CME 交付模式。在线和现场 CME 的吸引人之处不同。

相似文献

1
What Influences Choice of Continuing Medical Education Modalities and Providers? A National Survey of U.S. Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician Assistants.哪些因素影响继续医学教育模式和提供者的选择?一项对美国医生、护士从业者和医师助理的全国性调查。
Acad Med. 2021 Jan 1;96(1):93-100. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003758.
2
Barriers to identifying and obtaining CME: a national survey of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants.识别和获取继续医学教育的障碍:一项针对医生、执业护士和医师助理的全国性调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Mar 19;21(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02595-x.
3
On-site to on-line: barriers to the use of computers for continuing education.从现场到线上:计算机用于继续教育的障碍
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000 Summer;20(3):171-5. doi: 10.1002/chp.1340200306.
4
On-line delivery of continuing medical education over the World-Wide Web: an on-line needs assessment.通过万维网进行继续医学教育的在线交付:一项在线需求评估。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997 May;168(5):1161-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.168.5.9129405.
5
Primary care providers' sources and preferences for cognitive health information in the United States.美国初级保健提供者获取认知健康信息的来源和偏好。
Health Promot Int. 2010 Dec;25(4):464-73. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daq043. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
6
The practices and attitudes of primary care nurse practitioners and physician assistants with respect to colorectal cancer screening.初级护理执业护士和医师助理在结直肠癌筛查方面的做法和态度。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Nov;95(11):3259-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03262.x.
7
Professional Development Perceptions and Practices Among U.S. Physicians: A Cross-Specialty National Survey.美国医生的专业发展认知与实践:一项跨专业全国性调查。
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1335-1345. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001624.
8
Provider satisfaction in army primary care clinics.军队基层医疗诊所中的提供者满意度。
Mil Med. 1999 Feb;164(2):132-5.
9
Attitudes, perceptions and practice of alcohol and drug screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment: a case study of New York State primary care physicians and non-physician providers.酒精和药物筛查、简短干预及转介治疗的态度、认知与实践:纽约州初级保健医生和非医生提供者的案例研究
Public Health. 2016 Oct;139:70-78. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging gaps in cancer care for young adults: A collaborative e-learning initiative for oncology nurses.弥合青年癌症患者护理差距:一项针对肿瘤护理人员的合作式电子学习倡议。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2025 May 1;35(3):496-517. doi: 10.5737/23688076353496. eCollection 2025.
2
Oregon primary care providers as a frontline defense in the War on Melanoma™: improving access to melanoma education.俄勒冈州的初级保健提供者在“黑色素瘤之战™”中作为一线防御力量:改善黑色素瘤教育的可及性。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 14;12:1427136. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1427136. eCollection 2025.
3
China's national continuing medical education program for general practitioners: a cross-sectional survey (2016-2023).
中国全科医生国家继续医学教育项目:一项横断面调查(2016 - 2023年)
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 16;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06682-1.
4
Health sciences librarians' instructional engagement in continuing education: a scoping review.健康科学图书馆员在继续教育中的教学参与:一项范围综述
J Can Health Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;45(1):30-43. doi: 10.29173/jchla29656. eCollection 2024 Apr.
5
Current status and continuing medical education need for general practitioners in Tibet, China: a cross-sectional study.中国西藏地区全科医生的现状和继续医学教育需求:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05143-5.
6
Self-reported preferences and barriers to continued professional development in primary care physicians: a cross-sectional web-based survey in Qatar.自我报告的初级保健医生继续专业发展的偏好和障碍:卡塔尔的一项横断面网络调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Dec 13;24(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02235-x.
7
Web-Based Learning for General Practitioners and Practice Nurses Regarding Behavior Change: Qualitative Descriptive Study.针对全科医生和执业护士开展的关于行为改变的网络学习:定性描述性研究
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jul 27;9:e45587. doi: 10.2196/45587.
8
On the advantages and disadvantages of virtual continuing medical education: a scoping review.虚拟继续医学教育的优缺点:范围综述。
Can Med Educ J. 2023 Jun 27;14(3):41-74. doi: 10.36834/cmej.75681. eCollection 2023 Jun.
9
Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of the Concussion Awareness Training Tool as continuing medical education in primary care.作为初级保健继续医学教育的脑震荡意识培训工具应用的障碍与促进因素
Concussion. 2023 May 19;8(2):CNC106. doi: 10.2217/cnc-2022-0014. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Physicians' continuing medical education activities and satisfaction with their ability to stay current in medical information and practice: A cross-sectional study.医生的继续医学教育活动及其对自身紧跟医学信息和实践发展能力的满意度:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 10;6(2):e1110. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1110. eCollection 2023 Feb.