• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2019 年冠状病毒病的早期诊断和人群预防。

Early diagnosis and population prevention of coronavirus disease 2019.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Vaccinology and Molecular Diagnostics, National Institute of Diagnostics and Vaccine Development in Infectious Diseases, Strait Collaborative Innovation Center of Biomedicine and Pharmaceutics, School of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Nov;15(6):345-350. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000649.

DOI:10.1097/COH.0000000000000649
PMID:32969974
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by nucleic acid and antibody testing as well as its contribution to mitigating the spread of coronavirus disease 2019.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) is the firstly developed and most widely used diagnostic technique for SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA NAT assays is always unsatisfactory, mainly due to insufficient viral RNA in samples, especially when upper respiratory samples were used. Compared with NAT assays, serological tests are more convenient and less dependent on the quality of sample collection. But the sensitivity of antibody assays varies largely to test samples collected at different time after onset of symptoms. The diagnostic sensitivity can be significantly improved by combination of RNA and antibody testing. Due to the lack of effective drugs and vaccines, population prevention results mainly from timely triage and quarantine of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals. Thus, extensive testing with NAT and antibody assays simultaneously is very important to constrain coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic.

SUMMARY

Viral RNA testing combining with serological testing could improve the early diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection, which has great value for clinical practice and public health.

摘要

目的综述

讨论通过核酸和抗体检测诊断严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)感染,以及其对减轻 2019 年冠状病毒病传播的贡献。

最近的发现

核酸检测(NAT)是首先开发并广泛用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的技术。然而,SARS-CoV-2 RNA NAT 检测的灵敏度始终不尽人意,主要是由于样本中病毒 RNA 不足,尤其是使用上呼吸道样本时。与 NAT 检测相比,血清学检测更方便,对样本采集质量的依赖性更小。但抗体检测对不同症状发作后采集的检测样本的灵敏度差异很大。通过 RNA 和抗体检测联合,可以显著提高诊断的灵敏度。由于缺乏有效的药物和疫苗,人群预防主要来自对 SARS-CoV-2 感染个体的及时分诊和隔离。因此,广泛地同时进行 NAT 和抗体检测对于控制 2019 年冠状病毒病的流行非常重要。

总结

病毒 RNA 检测结合血清学检测可提高 SARS-CoV-2 感染的早期诊断,这对临床实践和公共卫生具有重要价值。

相似文献

1
Early diagnosis and population prevention of coronavirus disease 2019.2019 年冠状病毒病的早期诊断和人群预防。
Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2020 Nov;15(6):345-350. doi: 10.1097/COH.0000000000000649.
2
Value of Viral Nucleic Acid in Sputum and Feces and Specific IgM/IgG in Serum for the Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019.痰和粪便中的病毒核酸与血清特异性 IgM/IgG 对 2019 年冠状病毒病的诊断价值。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 Aug 6;10:445. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00445. eCollection 2020.
3
Potential False-Negative Nucleic Acid Testing Results for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Thermal Inactivation of Samples with Low Viral Loads.低病毒载量样本热失活可导致严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 的核酸检测结果出现潜在假阴性。
Clin Chem. 2020 Jun 1;66(6):794-801. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa091.
4
[SARS-CoV-2 and Microbiological Diagnostic Dynamics in COVID-19 Pandemic].[严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2与2019冠状病毒病大流行中的微生物诊断动态]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2020 Jul;54(3):497-509. doi: 10.5578/mb.69839.
5
Different longitudinal patterns of nucleic acid and serology testing results based on disease severity of COVID-19 patients.基于 COVID-19 患者疾病严重程度的核酸和血清学检测结果的不同纵向模式。
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2020 Dec;9(1):833-836. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1756699.
6
Multi-tiered screening and diagnosis strategy for COVID-19: a model for sustainable testing capacity in response to pandemic.新冠病毒多层次筛查与诊断策略:应对大流行的可持续检测能力模式。
Ann Med. 2020 Aug;52(5):207-214. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2020.1763449. Epub 2020 May 14.
7
Disposition of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) whose respiratory specimens remain positive for severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR).2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的处置情况,这些患者的呼吸道标本通过聚合酶链反应检测(PCR)对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)仍呈阳性。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;41(11):1326-1327. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.286. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
8
Rapid Serological Assays and SARS-CoV-2 Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2: Comparative Study.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的快速血清学检测和SARS-CoV-2实时聚合酶链反应检测:比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 30;22(10):e19152. doi: 10.2196/19152.
9
Head-to-Head Comparison of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.两种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学检测方法的直接比较
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1351-1357. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa125.
10
A preliminary study on serological assay for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in 238 admitted hospital patients.238 例住院患者血清严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)抗体检测的初步研究。
Microbes Infect. 2020 May-Jun;22(4-5):206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2020.05.008. Epub 2020 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitivities of a Rapid Test Versus an ELISA Kit for Detecting Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG in Sera from an Egyptian Cohort.一种快速检测试验与 ELISA 试剂盒检测埃及队列血清中抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM/IgG 的敏感性比较。
Curr Microbiol. 2023 Nov 30;81(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s00284-023-03473-z.
2
Evaluation and Comparison of Serological Methods for COVID-19 Diagnosis.新型冠状病毒肺炎诊断血清学方法的评估与比较
Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Jul 23;8:682405. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.682405. eCollection 2021.