Suppr超能文献

危重症患者困难镇静对其管理和结局的影响。

Impact of difficult sedation on the management and outcome of critically ill patients.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, University Hospital Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.

Department of Nursing, Rovira i Virgili University, Tarragona, Spain.

出版信息

Nurs Crit Care. 2022 Jul;27(4):528-536. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12558. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The term "difficult sedation" (DS) refers to situations of therapeutic failure, tolerance, or deprivation of the sedatives administered.

AIMS

To characterize the profile of patients who developed DS and to assess its impact on the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS), as well as other complications related to their stay.

DESIGN

A prospective descriptive analysis was conducted of the practices of analgesia/sedation in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) over a 2-year period.

METHODS

All critically ill patients undergoing MV and sedation for more than 24 hours were prospectively followed until death or discharge. Demographic data, type, duration, complications of analgesia/sedation, and clinical outcome during ICU stay were recorded. Patients who developed DS were compared with those who were not difficult to sedate (not-DS).

RESULTS

A total of 327 patients were included, 24.1% of whom were difficult to sedate (DS). Patients in the DS group were younger (P = .001); less severely ill (P = .003); and were more likely to have a history of smoking (P = .045), alcohol (P < .001), and psychotropic use (P = .001) than the not-DS group. Patients included in the DS group were sedated for longer periods (P < .001) and required higher doses of midazolam (P < .036), propofol (P = .023), and remifentanyl (P = .026) than those in the not-DS group. Difficult-to-sedate patients were twice as likely to require more than one sedative simultaneously (P < .001), presented more periods of over-sedation (P = .031)/under-sedation (P = .024), and suffered more pain (P < .001) than patients in the not-DS group. Patients in the DS group had prolonged MV times (P < .001), developed more pressure ulcers (P > .001) and ventilator-associated pneumonias (P = .025), and were more likely to require tracheotomy (P = .001) than those in the not-DS group.

CONCLUSION

DS develops in one of four critically ill patients and has a negative impact on their outcomes Early identification of the clinical profile of this group and active prevention and treatment are essential strategies in order to minimize its impact.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

A quarter of mechanically ventilated patients may develop situations of DS, which negatively affects their outcome. Early detection and prevention of DS are essential to minimize its impact.

摘要

背景

“困难镇静”(DS)一词是指治疗失败、耐受或剥夺所给予镇静剂的情况。

目的

描述出现 DS 的患者的特征,并评估其对机械通气(MV)时间和重症监护病房住院时间(ICU-LOS)的影响,以及与住院相关的其他并发症。

设计

对 2 年内某医学外科重症监护病房(ICU)的镇痛/镇静实践进行前瞻性描述性分析。

方法

对接受 MV 和镇静超过 24 小时的所有危重症患者进行前瞻性随访,直至死亡或出院。记录人口统计学数据、镇痛/镇静的类型、持续时间、并发症以及 ICU 住院期间的临床结局。将出现 DS 的患者与那些易于镇静的患者(非 DS)进行比较。

结果

共纳入 327 例患者,其中 24.1%的患者难以镇静(DS)。DS 组患者年龄更小(P=0.001);病情较轻(P=0.003);且更有可能有吸烟史(P=0.045)、饮酒史(P<0.001)和精神药物使用史(P=0.001)。DS 组患者镇静时间更长(P<0.001),需要更高剂量的咪达唑仑(P<0.036)、丙泊酚(P=0.023)和瑞芬太尼(P=0.026)。与非 DS 组相比,难以镇静的患者同时需要使用两种以上镇静剂的可能性增加一倍(P<0.001),出现过度镇静(P=0.031)/镇静不足(P=0.024)的时间更长,且疼痛更严重(P<0.001)。DS 组患者 MV 时间延长(P<0.001),发生更多压疮(P>0.001)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(P=0.025),且更有可能需要气管切开术(P=0.001)。

结论

四分之一的机械通气患者可能出现 DS,这对他们的预后有负面影响。早期识别这类患者的临床特征并积极预防和治疗是至关重要的策略,以尽量减少其影响。

临床意义

四分之一的机械通气患者可能出现 DS,这会对他们的预后产生负面影响。早期发现和预防 DS 对于减轻其影响至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验