Rahne T, Plontke S K, Vordermark D, Strauss C, Scheller C
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Str. 40, 06120, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Halle (Saale), Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
HNO. 2021 Sep;69(9):750-758. doi: 10.1007/s00106-020-00948-4. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
Hearing function in patients with vestibular schwannoma is often classified according to the Gardner and Robertson (1988) or the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS, 1995) systems. These classification systems are based on English-language test procedures, there is no German-language equivalent. The aim of the study was to investigate the influence of various target parameters on hearing classification and to derive a recommendation for the use of German-language test methods.
The rules for speech audiometry based on English-language test procedures were applied to German speech test materials. In 91 patients with vestibular schwannoma, pure tone hearing thresholds, speech recognition thresholds, and speech discrimination at different sound pressure levels were measured. The patients were categorized according to the Gardner and Robertson and AAO-HNS classifications.
In both the Gardner-Robertson and the AAO-HNS classifications, the number of patients in the hearing classes with serviceable hearing function (measured as Pure Tone Average across three (3PTA) or four (4PTA) frequencies) was highest when using the 3PTA condition, followed by 4PTA , 4PTA , and 4PTA. If maximum word recognition score (WRS) was used instead of word recognition 40 dB above the sensation level (WRS), more patients were classified into the hearing classes with serviceable hearing function, irrespective of the mean pure tone hearing threshold.
The Gardner-Robertson and AAO-HNS classifications can be used in German-speaking settings. The Freiburg monosyllabic test can be used to determine speech discrimination scores or maximum word recognition.
前庭神经鞘瘤患者的听力功能通常根据加德纳和罗伯逊(1988年)或美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO - HNS,1995年)系统进行分类。这些分类系统基于英语测试程序,没有德语等效版本。本研究的目的是调查各种目标参数对听力分类的影响,并就德语测试方法的使用得出建议。
基于英语测试程序的言语测听规则应用于德语语音测试材料。对91例前庭神经鞘瘤患者测量了不同声压级下的纯音听力阈值、言语识别阈值和言语辨别率。根据加德纳和罗伯逊以及AAO - HNS分类对患者进行分类。
在加德纳 - 罗伯逊分类和AAO - HNS分类中,当使用三频率纯音平均听阈(3PTA)条件时,具有可用听力功能(以三个(3PTA)或四个(4PTA)频率的纯音平均听阈衡量)的听力分级中的患者数量最多,其次是4PTA、4PTA和4PTA。如果使用最大单词识别得分(WRS)而不是感觉级以上40 dB的单词识别率(WRS),则更多患者被分类到具有可用听力功能的听力分级中,而与平均纯音听力阈值无关。
加德纳 - 罗伯逊分类和AAO - HNS分类可用于德语环境。弗莱堡单音节测试可用于确定言语辨别得分或最大单词识别率。