Scheller Christian, Rampp Stefan, Tatagiba Marcos, Gharabaghi Alireza, Ramina Kristofer F, Ganslandt Oliver, Bischoff Barbara, Matthies Cordula, Westermaier Thomas, Pedro Maria Teresa, Rohde Veit, von Eckardstein Kajetan, Strauss Christian
1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale).
2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen.
J Neurosurg. 2019 May 3;133(1):249-256. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.JNS181784. Print 2020 Jul 1.
Patient positioning in vestibular schwannoma (VS) surgery is a matter of ongoing discussion. Factors to consider include preservation of cranial nerve functions, extent of tumor resection, and complications. The objective of this study was to determine the optimal patient positioning in VS surgery.
A subgroup analysis of a randomized, multicenter trial that investigated the efficacy of prophylactic nimodipine in VS surgery was performed to investigate the impact of positioning (semisitting or supine) on extent of resection, functional outcomes, and complications. The data of 97 patients were collected prospectively. All procedures were performed via a retrosigmoid approach. The semisitting position was chosen in 56 patients, whereas 41 patients were treated while supine.
Complete resection was obtained at a higher percentage in the semisitting as compared to the supine position (93% vs 73%, p = 0.002). Logistic regression analysis revealed significantly better facial nerve function in the early postoperative course in the semisitting group (p = 0.004), particularly concerning severe facial nerve paresis (House-Brackmann grade IV or worse; p = 0.002). One year after surgery, facial nerve function recovered. However, there was still a tendency for better facial nerve function in the semisitting group (p = 0.091). There were no significant differences between groups regarding hearing preservation rates. Venous air embolism with the necessity to terminate surgery occurred in 2 patients in the semisitting position (3.6%). Supplementary analysis with a 2-tailed permutation randomization with 10,000 permutations of treatment choice and a propensity score matching showed either a tendency or significant results for better facial nerve outcomes in the early postoperative course and extent of resection in the semisitting group.
Although the results of the various statistical analyses are not uniform, the data indicate better results concerning both a higher rate of complete removal (according to the intraoperative impression of the surgeon) and facial nerve function after a semisitting as compared to the supine position. These advantages may justify the potential higher risk for severe complications of the semisitting position in VS surgery. The choice of positioning has to consider all individual patient parameters and risks carefully.
前庭神经鞘瘤(VS)手术中的患者体位是一个仍在讨论的问题。需要考虑的因素包括颅神经功能的保留、肿瘤切除范围和并发症。本研究的目的是确定VS手术中最佳的患者体位。
对一项研究预防性尼莫地平在VS手术中疗效的随机、多中心试验进行亚组分析,以研究体位(半坐位或仰卧位)对切除范围、功能结果和并发症的影响。前瞻性收集了97例患者的数据。所有手术均通过乙状窦后入路进行。56例患者选择半坐位,而41例患者仰卧位接受治疗。
与仰卧位相比,半坐位的完全切除率更高(93%对73%,p = 0.002)。逻辑回归分析显示,半坐位组术后早期面神经功能明显更好(p = 0.004),尤其是在严重面神经麻痹方面(House-Brackmann分级IV级或更差;p = 0.002)。术后一年,面神经功能恢复。然而,半坐位组的面神经功能仍有更好的趋势(p = 0.091)。两组在听力保留率方面无显著差异。半坐位有2例患者发生静脉空气栓塞,需要终止手术(3.6%)。采用双尾排列随机化进行补充分析,对治疗选择进行10000次排列,并进行倾向评分匹配,结果显示半坐位组术后早期面神经结果更好以及切除范围更大,呈现出一种趋势或显著结果。
尽管各种统计分析的结果并不一致,但数据表明,与仰卧位相比,半坐位在完全切除率(根据外科医生的术中印象)和面神经功能方面有更好的结果。这些优势可能证明VS手术中半坐位严重并发症的潜在更高风险是合理的。体位的选择必须仔细考虑所有个体患者参数和风险。