Grant Joan S, Graven Lucinda J, Prapanjaroensin Aoyjai, Azuero Andres, Luttik Marie Louise
Joan S. Grant, PhD, RN Professor, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing. Lucinda J. Graven, PhD, ARNP, FAHA Associate Professor, Florida State University College of Nursing. Aoyjai Prapanjaroensin, PhD, BSN Postdoctoral Candidate, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing. Andres Azuero, PhD, MBA Associate Professor and Biostatistician, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing. Marie Louise Luttik, PhD Professor, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, Groningen, Netherlands.
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):E70-E76. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000739.
Psychometric properties of the 38-item version of the Dutch Objective Burden Inventory (DOBI) have been evaluated primarily in older female caregivers, with no published studies that vary by a different gender and age distribution.
The aim of this study was to test the construct validity and reliability of the DOBI in caregivers of individuals with heart failure from the United States and other countries.
This secondary analysis from a cross-sectional study used an online survey. Factorial validity was tested with confirmatory factor analysis, item performance was examined with ordinal item response analysis, and convergent validity was tested correlating DOBI subscale scores with Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale scores. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Cronbach α.
Item response analysis removed 14 items. Confirmatory factor analysis retained the original 4-factor solution. Original and reduced instruments demonstrated good internal consistency. Validity was supported by meaningful associations with the Bakas Caregiving Outcomes Scale.
Both the original 38-item DOBI and the reduced 24-item DOBI had support for their construct validity and internal consistency. The 24-item DOBI may be a useful alternative to the 38-item version, because it maintains psychometric properties of the original instrument while decreasing data collection burden. However, more research is needed to assess whether the shorter version is useful in assessing objective caregiving burden.
荷兰客观负担量表(DOBI)38项版本的心理测量特性主要在老年女性照料者中进行了评估,尚无按不同性别和年龄分布进行的已发表研究。
本研究旨在检验DOBI在美国及其他国家心力衰竭患者照料者中的结构效度和信度。
本横断面研究的二次分析采用在线调查。通过验证性因子分析检验因子效度,通过有序项目反应分析检查项目表现,并通过将DOBI分量表得分与巴卡斯照料结果量表得分进行相关性分析来检验收敛效度。使用克朗巴赫α系数评估内部一致性信度。
项目反应分析删除了14个项目。验证性因子分析保留了原来的四因子模型。原始量表和简化后的量表均显示出良好的内部一致性。与巴卡斯照料结果量表的有意义关联支持了效度。
原始的38项DOBI和简化后的24项DOBI在结构效度和内部一致性方面均得到了支持。24项DOBI可能是38项版本的一个有用替代方案,因为它在保持原始量表心理测量特性的同时减轻了数据收集负担。然而,需要更多研究来评估较短版本是否有助于评估客观照料负担。