Schünemann Holger J, Ventresca Matthew, Crowther Mark, Briel Matthias, Zhou Qi, Noble Simon, Macbeth Fergus, Griffiths Gareth, Garcia David, Lyman Gary H, Di Nisio Marcello, Iorio Alfonso, Mbuagbaw Lawrence, Neumann Ignacio, van Es Nick, Brouwers Melissa, Guyatt Gordon, Streiff Michael B, Marcucci Maura, Baldeh Tejan, Florez Ivan D, Alma Ozlem Gurunlu, Solh Ziad, Bossuyt Patrick M, Kahale Lara A, Ageno Walter, Bozas George, Büller Harry R, Lebeau Bernard, Lecumberri Ramon, Loprinzi Charles, McBane Robert, Sideras Kostandinos, Maraveyas Anthony, Pelzer Uwe, Perry James, Klerk Clara, Agnelli Giancarlo, Akl Elie A
Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McGRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Michael G DeGroote Cochrane Canada and McGRADE Centres, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lancet Haematol. 2020 Oct;7(10):e746-e755. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30293-3.
Study-level meta-analyses provide high-certainty evidence that heparin reduces the risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism for patients with cancer; however, whether the benefits and harms associated with heparin differ by cancer type is unclear. This individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials examines the effect of heparin on survival, venous thromboembolism, and bleeding in patients with cancer in general and by type.
In this systematic review and meta-analysis we searched MEDLINE, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for randomised controlled trials comparing parenteral anticoagulants with placebo or standard care in ambulatory patients with solid tumours and no indication for anticoagulation published from the inception of each database to January 14, 2017, and updated it on May 14, 2020, without language restrictions. We calculated the effect of parenteral anticoagulant administration on all-cause mortality, venous thromboembolism occurrence, and bleeding related outcomes through multivariable hierarchical models with patient-level variables as fixed effects and a categorical trial variable as a random effect, adjusting for age, cancer type, and metastatic status. Interaction terms were tested to investigate effects in predefined subgroups. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42013003526.
We obtained individual participant data from 14 of 20 eligible randomised controlled trials (8278 [79%] of 10 431 participants; 4139 included in the low-molecular-weight heparin group and 4139 in the control group). Meta-analysis showed an adjusted relative risk (RR) of mortality at 1 year of 0·99 (95% CI 0·93-1·06) and a hazard ratio of 1·01 (95% CI 0·96-1·07). The number of patients with venous thromboembolic events was 158 (4·0%) of 3958 with available data in the low-molecular-weight heparin group compared with 279 (7·1%) of 3957 in the control group. Major bleeding events occurred in 71 (1·7%) of 4139 patients in the control population and 88 (2·1%) in the low-molecular-weight heparin group, and minor bleeding events in 478 (12·1%) of 3945 patients with available data in the control group and 652 (16·6%) of 3937 patients in the low-molecular-weight heparin group. The adjusted RR was 0·58 (95% CI 0·47-0·71) for venous thromboembolism, 1·27 (0·92-1·74) for major bleeding, and 1·34 (1·19-1·51) for minor bleeding. Prespecified subgroup analysis of venous thromboembolism occurrence by cancer type identified the most certain benefit from heparin treatment in patients with lung cancer (RR 0·59 [95% CI 0·42-0·81]), which dominated the overall reduction in venous thromboembolism. Certainty of the evidence for the outcomes ranged from moderate to high.
Low-molecular-weight heparin reduces risk of venous thromboembolism without increasing risk of major bleeding compared with placebo or standard care in patients with solid tumours, but it does not improve survival.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
研究层面的荟萃分析提供了高确定性证据,表明肝素可降低癌症患者发生有症状静脉血栓栓塞的风险;然而,肝素相关的获益和危害是否因癌症类型而异尚不清楚。这项针对随机对照试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析,考察了肝素对癌症患者总体及不同类型患者的生存、静脉血栓栓塞和出血情况的影响。
在这项系统评价和荟萃分析中,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,以查找比较肠外抗凝剂与安慰剂或标准治疗的随机对照试验,这些试验涉及非卧床实体瘤患者且无抗凝指征,自每个数据库建立至2017年1月14日发表,2020年5月14日进行了更新,无语言限制。我们通过多变量分层模型计算肠外抗凝剂给药对全因死亡率、静脉血栓栓塞发生情况和出血相关结局的影响,将患者层面变量作为固定效应,将分类试验变量作为随机效应,并对年龄、癌症类型和转移状态进行调整。测试交互项以研究预定义亚组中的效应。本研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD42013003526。
我们从20项符合条件的随机对照试验中的14项获取了个体参与者数据(10431名参与者中的8278名[79%];低分子量肝素组纳入4139名,对照组纳入4139名)。荟萃分析显示,1年时调整后的死亡相对风险(RR)为0.99(95%CI 0.93 - 1.06),风险比为1.01(95%CI 0.96 - 1.07)。低分子量肝素组有可用数据的3958名患者中,发生静脉血栓栓塞事件的患者有158名(4.0%),而对照组3957名患者中有279名(7.1%)。对照组4139名患者中有71名(1.7%)发生大出血事件,低分子量肝素组有88名(2.1%);对照组有可用数据的3945名患者中有478名(12.1%)发生小出血事件,低分子量肝素组3937名患者中有652名(16.6%)。静脉血栓栓塞的调整后RR为0.58(95%CI 0.47 - 0.71),大出血为1.27(0.92 - 1.74),小出血为1.34(1.19 - 1.51)。按癌症类型对静脉血栓栓塞发生情况进行的预定义亚组分析确定,肺癌患者从肝素治疗中获益最明确(RR 0.59[95%CI 0.42 - 0.81]),这主导了静脉血栓栓塞的总体减少。这些结局的证据确定性从中度到高度不等。
与安慰剂或标准治疗相比,低分子量肝素可降低实体瘤患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险,且不增加大出血风险,但并未改善生存情况。
加拿大卫生研究院。