• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于ⅠA 期非小细胞肺癌微创与开放解剖性肺段切除术的全国性分析。

A National Analysis of Minimally Invasive Vs Open Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

机构信息

Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.

University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(2):535-544. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 23.

DOI:10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.09.009
PMID:32977013
Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare long-term outcomes of open vs minimally invasive (MIS) segmentectomy for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which has not been previouslyevaluated using national studies. Outcomes of open vs MIS segmentectomy for clinical T1, N0, M0 NSCLC in the National Cancer Data Base (2010-2015) were evaluated using propensity score matching. Of the 39,351 patients who underwent surgery for stage IA NSCLC from 2010 to 2015, 770 underwent segmentectomy by thoracotomy and 1056 by MIS approach (876 thoracoscopic [VATS], 180 robotic). The MIS to open conversion rate was 6.7% (n = 71). After propensity score matching, all baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the open (n = 683) and MIS (n = 683) groups. When compared to the open group, the MIS group had shorter median length of stay (4 vs 5 days, P< 0.001) and lower 30-day mortality (0.6% vs 1.9%, P = 0.037). There were no significant differences between MIS and open groups with regard to 30-day readmission (5.0% vs 3.7%, P = 0.43), or upstaging from cN0 to pN1/N2/N3 (3.1% vs 3.6%, P = 0.89). The MIS approach was associated with similar long-term overall survival as the open approach (5-year survival: 62.3% vs 63.5%, P = 0.89; multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio: 0.99, 95% Confidence Intervial (CI): 0.82-1.21, P = 0.96). In this national analysis of open vs MIS segmentectomy for clinical stage IA NSCLC, MIS was associated with shorter length of stay and lower perioperative mortality, and similar nodal upstaging and 5-year survival when compared to segmentectomy via thoracotomy. MIS segmentectomy does not appear to compromise oncologic outcomes for clinical stage IA NSCLC.

摘要

本研究旨在比较开放与微创(MIS)解剖性肺段切除术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的长期疗效,此前尚未使用全国性研究进行评估。利用国家癌症数据库(2010-2015 年)评估了 2010 年至 2015 年接受手术治疗的 I 期 NSCLC 患者中,开胸与 MIS 解剖性肺段切除术的临床 T1N0M0 患者的结局。在 2010 年至 2015 年期间接受手术治疗的 39351 例 I 期 NSCLC 患者中,770 例行剖胸肺段切除术,1056 例行 MIS 解剖性肺段切除术(876 例为电视辅助胸腔镜手术[VATS],180 例为机器人手术)。MIS 转开胸的转化率为 6.7%(n=71)。经倾向评分匹配后,开放组(n=683)和 MIS 组(n=683)的所有基线特征均得到很好的平衡。与开放组相比,MIS 组的中位住院时间更短(4 天 vs 5 天,P<0.001),30 天死亡率更低(0.6% vs 1.9%,P=0.037)。两组间 30 天再入院率(5.0% vs 3.7%,P=0.43)或 cN0 至 pN1/N2/N3 的分期升级率(3.1% vs 3.6%,P=0.89)无显著差异。MIS 法与开放法在长期总生存率方面相似(5 年生存率:62.3% vs 63.5%,P=0.89;多变量调整后危险比:0.99,95%置信区间[CI]:0.82-1.21,P=0.96)。在这项关于临床 I 期 NSCLC 开胸与 MIS 解剖性肺段切除术的全国性分析中,与剖胸肺段切除术相比,MIS 法与较短的住院时间和较低的围手术期死亡率相关,且淋巴结分期升级和 5 年生存率相似。MIS 解剖性肺段切除术似乎不会影响临床 I 期 NSCLC 的肿瘤学结局。

相似文献

1
A National Analysis of Minimally Invasive Vs Open Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.一项关于ⅠA 期非小细胞肺癌微创与开放解剖性肺段切除术的全国性分析。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(2):535-544. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
2
Segmentectomy for clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer: National benchmarks for nodal staging and outcomes by operative approach.肺段切除术治疗临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌:手术方式对淋巴结分期和结局的国家基准
Cancer. 2022 Apr 1;128(7):1483-1492. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34071. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
3
Use and Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lobectomy for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Cancer Data Base.国家癌症数据库中I期非小细胞肺癌微创肺叶切除术的应用与疗效
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Mar;101(3):1037-42. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.018. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
4
A National Analysis of Short-term Outcomes and Long-term Survival Following Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy for Clinical Stage II Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.一项全国性分析:胸腔镜与开胸肺叶切除术治疗临床 II 期非小细胞肺癌的短期结局和长期生存。
Ann Surg. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):595-605. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003231.
5
A National Analysis of Long-term Survival Following Thoracoscopic Versus Open Lobectomy for Stage I Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.一项针对 I 期非小细胞肺癌行电视辅助胸腔镜手术与开胸肺叶切除术长期生存的全国性分析。
Ann Surg. 2019 Jan;269(1):163-171. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002342.
6
Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis.机器人与胸腔镜肺段切除术治疗早期肺癌的早期结果:多机构倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Nov;160(5):1363-1372. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.12.112. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
7
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Thoracotomy for Anatomical Segmentectomy in Patients With Clinical Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.视频辅助胸腔镜手术是临床 I 期非小细胞肺癌患者解剖性肺段切除术的一种安全有效的替代开胸手术的方法。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):465-72; discussion 472. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.112. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
8
Perioperative Outcomes and 5-year Survival After Open versus Thoracoscopic Sleeve Resection for Lung Cancer.开胸与胸腔镜袖式切除术治疗肺癌的围手术期结局和 5 年生存率。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;33(2):522-530. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2020.08.013. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
9
Propensity-score adjusted comparison of pathologic nodal upstaging by robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and open lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer.机器人辅助、电视辅助胸腔镜和开放性肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌病理性淋巴结分期上调的倾向评分调整比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Nov;158(5):1457-1466.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.06.113. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Comparing Robotic, Thoracoscopic, and Open Segmentectomy: A National Cancer Database Analysis.比较机器人辅助、胸腔镜和开放性肺段切除术:国家癌症数据库分析。
J Surg Res. 2024 Apr;296:674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.01.028. Epub 2024 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Is segmentectomy potentially adequate for clinical stage IA3 non-small cell lung cancer.肺段切除术对临床IA3期非小细胞肺癌是否可能足够?
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Mar 5;40(3). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf064.
2
The Surgical Renaissance: Advancements in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.外科复兴:电视辅助胸腔镜手术和机器人辅助胸外科手术的进展及其对患者预后的影响。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;16(17):3086. doi: 10.3390/cancers16173086.
3
Prolonged air leak after robotic lung resection: a narrative review.
机器人辅助肺切除术后的持续漏气:一项叙述性综述。
J Thorac Dis. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):909-917. doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-818. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
4
Robotic segmentectomy using a lung base-flip approach.采用肺底翻转法的机器人肺段切除术。
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Aug 3;15:174-176. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.07.013. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Adoption of Robotic Core Technology in Minimally Invasive Lung Segmentectomy: Review.机器人核心技术在微创肺段切除术中的应用:综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 30;12(9):1417. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091417.
6
The Role of Surgery in Lung Cancer Treatment: Present Indications and Future Perspectives-State of the Art.手术在肺癌治疗中的作用:当前适应证与未来展望——最新进展
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 23;13(15):3711. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153711.
7
Technical Advances in Segmentectomy for Lung Cancer: A Minimally Invasive Strategy for Deep, Small, and Impalpable Tumors.肺癌肺段切除术的技术进展:针对深部、微小及不可触及肿瘤的微创策略
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 23;13(13):3137. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133137.