Early outcomes of robotic versus thoracoscopic segmentectomy for early-stage lung cancer: A multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Anatomical segmentectomy via robotic thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) are minimally invasive surgical approaches for treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, few research studies have compared early outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made of 774 patients, 298 who received robotic and 476 who received VATS, who underwent minimally invasive segmentectomy for early-stage NSCLC at 3 academic institutions between June 2015 and August 2019. Perioperative outcomes were compared after propensity score-matching on the basis of age, gender, body mass index, percent forced expiratory volume in 1 second, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of segmentectomy, tumor size, and institution.

RESULTS

There were 257 patients in each group after propensity score-matching. The baseline characteristics and type of segmentectomy were comparable. Three conversions to thoracotomy occurred in the VATS group, and 1 in the robotic group (P = .624). There was no significant difference in operative time (147.91 ± 52.42 vs 149.23 ± 49.66 minutes; P = .773), blood loss (50 mL [interquartile range (IQR), 50-100 mL] vs 100 mL [IQR, 30-100 mL]; P = .177), rates of overall complications (17.9 vs 14.8%; P = .340), and length of stay (4 days [IQR, 3-5 days] vs 4 days [IQR, 3-5 days]; P = .417) between the robotic and VATS groups, respectively. Robotic segmentectomy was more costly ($12,019.30 ± 1678.30 vs $7834.80 ± 1291.20; P < .001) because of the amortization and consumables of the robotic system. There were a greater number of N1 lymph nodes and N1 stations in the robotic group.

CONCLUSIONS

Segmentectomy with robotic and VATS are safe and feasible for early-stage NSCLC treatment. A robotic approach might lead to a better N1 lymph node dissection.