University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
University of Tennessee Space Institute, Tullahoma, TN, 37388, USA.
Appl Ergon. 2021 Jan;90:103241. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103241. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
Since the inception of High Reliability Theory in 1981, researchers and practitioners have theorized about the questions, "How do you know if you're an HRO, and how do you validate it?" Evidence now exists that organizations seeking high reliability and resilience have moved away from the theoretical phase, and into the application phase where organizations adopt the HRO hallmarks plus culture as operational targets and create interventions to effect change. The evidence of high reliability operations in organizations is key for validating that HRO is implementable and is also beneficial. After collecting over 1400 artifacts, we found 34 scholarly efforts published which purposefully targeted implementation measures toward achieving an HRO state and measured the outcomes. From that evidence, we concluded that three specific interventions have been used which were useful and generalizable to guide practitioners in moving toward an HRO state: process redesign, training, and organization redesign. We suggest that this evidence may assert that organizations which are not functioning as an HRO can be redesigned to do so.
自 1981 年高可靠性理论诞生以来,研究人员和从业者一直在思考这样的问题:“如何知道自己是否处于高可靠性组织(HRO)状态,又如何验证这一点?”现在有证据表明,寻求高可靠性和恢复力的组织已经从理论阶段转向应用阶段,在该阶段,组织采用 HRO 的特征加上文化作为运营目标,并采取干预措施来实现变革。组织中高可靠性运营的证据对于验证 HRO 的可实施性和有益性至关重要。在收集了 1400 多件文物后,我们发现有 34 项学术研究有目的地针对实现 HRO 状态的实施措施,并衡量了结果。根据这些证据,我们得出结论,有三种具体的干预措施已经被证明是有用的和可推广的,可以指导实践者朝着 HRO 状态前进:流程重新设计、培训和组织重新设计。我们认为,这一证据可以证明,那些没有以 HRO 方式运作的组织可以通过重新设计来实现这一点。