Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3740, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Nov;198:106235. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106235. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
Transradial access has recently been gaining more popularity in various neurointerventional procedures. To this day, a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the outcomes of transradial access for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke have not been performed.
PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies published in the last ten years reporting on the use of transradial access for acute stroke intervention were eligible. The DerSimonian-Laird random effects model was used, and the primary endpoints included puncture to reperfusion time, end mRS, TICI reperfusion, mortality, and access site complications.
A total of 515 records were identified. Fourteen observational studies reported on the use of radial access for thrombectomy, with 10 of these studies (n = 309) included in the meta-analysis. Mean puncture to reperfusion time associated with the transradial access was 46.864 ± 6.601 min. Favorable end mRS of ≤ 2 was reported in 37.1 % ± 7.3 % of patients. TICI ≥ 2B was achieved in 84.6 % ± 3.4 % of patients. All-cause mortality was observed in 9.3 % ± 4.8 % of patients. Transradial access had low complications with only 1.4 % ± 0.7 % of stroke cases. When the transradial studies were compared to the contemporary randomized clinical trials using the standard transfemoral access, no significant differences were found in all of these primary outcomes.
This meta-analysis study demonstrates that transradial access for mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke may be a feasible and safe alternative. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these results.
经桡动脉入路在各种神经介入治疗中最近越来越受欢迎。迄今为止,尚未进行过系统评价和荟萃分析来研究经桡动脉入路在急性脑卒中机械取栓中的结果。
系统检索了 PubMed、Embase 和 Scopus 数据库。纳入报告经桡动脉入路用于急性脑卒中介入治疗的研究,发表时间在过去十年内。使用 DerSimonian-Laird 随机效应模型,主要终点包括穿刺至再灌注时间、终点 mRS、TICI 再灌注、死亡率和入路部位并发症。
共确定了 515 条记录。14 项观察性研究报告了经桡动脉入路用于取栓的情况,其中 10 项研究(n=309)纳入荟萃分析。经桡动脉入路的平均穿刺至再灌注时间为 46.864±6.601min。37.1%±7.3%的患者报告了良好的终点 mRS≤2。84.6%±3.4%的患者达到了 TICI≥2B。9.3%±4.8%的患者发生全因死亡率。经桡动脉入路的并发症发生率较低,仅为 1.4%±0.7%的脑卒中病例。将经桡动脉入路的研究与使用标准股动脉入路的当代随机临床试验进行比较,在所有这些主要结局方面均未发现显著差异。
这项荟萃分析研究表明,经桡动脉入路用于急性脑卒中机械取栓可能是一种可行且安全的替代方法。需要进一步前瞻性研究来验证这些结果。